Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

BC’s New Mining Consultation Framework Falls Short on Clarity, Confidentiality, and Respect for First Nations


BC’s New Mining Consultation Framework Falls Short on Clarity, Confidentiality, and Respect for First Nations

 

REVELSTOKE, BC: The Conservative Official Opposition is calling out the NDP government’s rushed and flawed rollout of the Mineral Claims Consultation Framework (MCCF), saying it ignores industry requirements and fails to deliver the meaningful consultation with First Nations that is constitutionally required.

“This framework falls far short of the respect these communities deserve,” said Scott McInnis, MLA for Columbia River-Revelstoke and Critic for Indigenous Relations and Reconciliation. “The NDP have prioritized checking a legal box over building a process rooted in trust and transparency.”

McInnis said the entire framework looks like it was rushed through to meet the March 26 implementation deadline. The framework appears only to satisfy the minimum requirements of the Gitxaała ruling.

“This is not reconciliation,” said McInnis, “it’s regulatory theatre.”

McInnis acknowledged that “consultation may be the legal requirement,” but questioned whether the voices of First Nations and industry were truly heard during the creation of the framework.

Introduced in response to the Gitxaała decision, the MCCF now requires consultation before mineral claims are registered. However, final decisions rest with the Chief Gold Commissioner, without independent oversight, a clear appeal process, or public standards for what qualifies as consultation or accommodation.

“The government hasn’t explained what supports are available, how to access them, or whether they’re even adequate,” said McInnis. “Real consultation means real resources, not just downloading responsibilities without clear support. It remains unclear how any potential backlog of claims will be managed under this new framework.”

Another major concern is the breach of confidentiality. For the first time, applicants’ names will be published, potentially exposing intellectual property and undermining objectivity.


The Association for Mineral Exploration (AME) raised concerns about both confidentiality and the lack of binding timelines, warning that publishing names risks compromising fairness, and that timelines remain vague despite Premier Eby’s public commitments.

“The government claims to support reconciliation and economic development, but this framework does neither,” McInnis said. “It leaves Indigenous Nations without support to participate, and industry without the stability to move forward.”

Pete Davis, MLA for Kootenay-Rockies and Critic for Mining, Critical Minerals, and the Columbia Treaty, said the framework offers no firm timelines, no protection for applicant confidentiality, and no assurance that consultation will be meaningful.

“This should have brought certainty to both Indigenous communities and the mining sector,” said Davis. “Instead, the NDP had 18 months and failed to deliver.”

McInnis also emphasized the importance of supporting prospectors, who are being left without clarity under the new framework. “There’s still no guidance for how claims will be handled when traditional territories overlap, a gap that could create conflict between Nations,” he said. “The government hasn’t addressed the issue of title, which is critical.”

He added that the framework should strike a balance between respecting the interests of First Nations and prospectors. “Failure to consult industry meaningfully will lead to additional confusion and friction.”

The government has also signaled plans to align the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act (DRIPA) with the Mineral Tenure Act by 2026, before this framework has even proven it can work. “You don’t build trust or certainty by moving ahead with major structural changes before your foundation is even tested,” said McInnis.

“True, lasting frameworks in reconciliation efforts have to work for everyone who sits at the table. This MCCF only satisfies the NDP and essentially ignores everyone else,” said McInnis.

“This framework misses the mark, and we will keep standing up for First Nations and responsible resource development until it’s fixed.”

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- If having three un-happy MLA’s leave the party, is what it takes to have unity within caucus, then I say, “Fine; let it be so”

Regrettably, in recent days, issues within the Conservative Party of BC have come to the surface resulting in one member being removed from Caucus (Dallas Brodie) and the party, and two others (Tara Armstrong and Jordan Kealy) leaving of their own accord. As of this morning (Saturday March 8th) all three are now sitting as independents in the BC legislature. So, what does that mean? In the last twenty-four hours social media feeds have lit up with support for leader John Rustad, while others have been negative, accusing the party, and Rustad, of being bullies and not standing up for conservative values. Ryan Painter, who has personally worked with John Rustad, had this to say: Since the beginning, he's had one target: the BC NDP. He knows that British Columbians deserve a government that works for them, delivers on their promises, and doesn't tax them into poverty. He believes in his team and the power of a focused opposition. He knows who the enemy is. He knows BC deserves ...
Post a Comment
Read more

WARD STAMER: “Hopefully he’s actually listening to what people have to say, and not just showing up for a photo op”

In his latest travels across the province, BC Forest Minister Ravi Parmar touched down in the Okanagan. A trip essentially, he said, to be on the ground meeting industry people. I read what he had to say, and about how he has been tasked with getting more timber to market. Let me start by saying, “ He hasn’t been tasked. He and Premier Eby guaranteed 45 million cubic metres of available wood fibre – they guaranteed that .” BC Timber Sales is a government agency within the provincial forest’s ministry, which is responsible for managing a portion of the province's Crown timber; specifically, 20 percent of the province's annual allowable cut. Unfortunately, BC Timber Sales did not provide anywhere near that amount last year, it was just 12.2 percent. Three years ago, BC mills cut 52 million metres of wood, bringing in nearly $2 billion dollars to the provincial treasury. That figure doesn’t include the taxes from 55,700 people directly employed in the industry, nor from the tens o...
Post a Comment
Read more

Conservative Opposition demonstrates focused and policy-oriented approach in first four weeks of the legislative session

In the first four weeks of the legislative session, the Conservative Official Opposition has scored significant policy wins as it proves every day that the Conservative team has fresh ideas and real-world experience to bring to the table. At the same time, the NDP government has been listless, struggling to find a policy agenda that addresses the problems that British Columbians are facing. “This NDP government led by David Eby has tried to do everything under the sun to distract from their disastrous fiscal record and the fact that they are utterly out of ideas,” said Conservative Opposition Leader John Rustad. “They’ve tried to use the U.S. President to deflect from their eye-popping $11 billion deficit, the worst business confidence in the country, and the fact that they’ve created almost zero private sector jobs. This is no way to run a province or an economy.” Since the legislative session started on February 18th with the Throne Speech, the opposition...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more