Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

KRUGELL: Carney and auto tariffs -- the tone shifted

That was a muted statement he gave. Sure, we had the lines of we'll endure. We'll prevail. Blah, blah, blah. It was muted though and the reality is, our Canada Goose might be cooked unless someone in the USA can scare some sense into Donald Trump


One thing I respect about Mark Carney is that he's managerial. That's the same quality I liked in Stephen Harper. You aren't dealing with an ideologue. Guys like Carney and Harper tell you when it is bad, that it is bad. They don't sugar coat it. They don't pump you up.

Justin Trudeau was a very different kind of man. He rallied the troops on the eve of battle, even if the outcome was going to be defeat. Maybe that's a bad thing. You know? Setting unrealistic expectations.
Then again, maybe being realistic isn't all that great either. That's a discussion for another time.

Regardless, yesterday Donald Trump went off the rails again, gave a rambling speech about how everyone is mean to America and he announced 25% tariffs on all imported automobiles.

What is unclear is if this is just for finished assembled automobiles or also for parts. Mark Carney stated the government had to review the technical language of the executive order Trump signed. The likelihood was that this is for both finished products and parts.

Trump has made it clear he wants cars in the United States to be 100% made in the United States. That wish is unrealistic.

Still, as stated, this was a direct attack on the economies of Ontario and Quebec, and on Canada as a whole.

Mark Carney gave a statement to the press and it was subdued. He laid out the lines that this is unjustified, unfair, and ultimately hurts both countries. What was absent was the feeling that we were going to thump Trump over the head with counter tariffs. Sure, they are coming, but as Carney admitted last week - there's really little we can do and our limits are within sight.

Maybe you think I'm wrong here.

My argument is that Mark Carney knows that he has to set honest expectations on the trade war. He's poised to win a large majority government of 185+ seats. It won't be a minority. He won't be relying on other parties to get legislation through. It will all be on his shoulders.

If he allows himself to be over sold and then under deliver, it will sour the public on his government very quickly. There's no faster way on being a one term Prime Minister than completely failing in the first few months.

Just ask Joe Clark. He didn't even make it a year.

We all recall Doug Ford with this 25% surcharge on electricity that got repealed 3 hours after Trump threatened even worse reprisals. Trump has also threatened worse, again, if he thinks Canada and the EU are working together. Yeah, as insane as that sounds that is what Mark Carney is facing as Prime Minister. I am glad I do not have his job.

That was a muted statement he gave. Sure, we had the lines of we'll endure. We'll prevail. Blah, blah, blah. It was muted though and the reality is, our Canada Goose might be cooked unless someone in the USA can scare some sense into Donald Trump.

Last time it was the big three auto makers that called him up and talked some sense into him. This time he made it clear that they had a month to get their plans together and this is happening.
What can Carney do? Retaliatory tariffs? Yeah, that's the standard play from the book. Sure the government will do that. There's a problem this time.

The Americans that don't want them have no power to change policy, and the Americans that want them (those supporting Trump) don't care that they'll be hurt in the process. They believe a year or two of pain is worth it. You cannot fight a cult member on ideas or with facts or logic.

The problem is our automotive industry cannot handle those kinds of tariffs for a year or two. Six months is going to be brutal. Retaliatory tariffs won't keep Ford and GM plants open after six months and in the USA no one is going to spend $10,000 more for a car made in Canada when the one made in the USA is regular price.

None of this is a slam or an attack on Mark Carney. It is just a very simple statement: he can't make this go away. He can't fix this. Poilievre couldn't fix this either. Nor could Singh, May, or anyone else.

As a few commentators mentioned yesterday, the realization is sinking in that we might be in real trouble.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more