Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

KRUGELL: Carney and auto tariffs -- the tone shifted

That was a muted statement he gave. Sure, we had the lines of we'll endure. We'll prevail. Blah, blah, blah. It was muted though and the reality is, our Canada Goose might be cooked unless someone in the USA can scare some sense into Donald Trump


One thing I respect about Mark Carney is that he's managerial. That's the same quality I liked in Stephen Harper. You aren't dealing with an ideologue. Guys like Carney and Harper tell you when it is bad, that it is bad. They don't sugar coat it. They don't pump you up.

Justin Trudeau was a very different kind of man. He rallied the troops on the eve of battle, even if the outcome was going to be defeat. Maybe that's a bad thing. You know? Setting unrealistic expectations.
Then again, maybe being realistic isn't all that great either. That's a discussion for another time.

Regardless, yesterday Donald Trump went off the rails again, gave a rambling speech about how everyone is mean to America and he announced 25% tariffs on all imported automobiles.

What is unclear is if this is just for finished assembled automobiles or also for parts. Mark Carney stated the government had to review the technical language of the executive order Trump signed. The likelihood was that this is for both finished products and parts.

Trump has made it clear he wants cars in the United States to be 100% made in the United States. That wish is unrealistic.

Still, as stated, this was a direct attack on the economies of Ontario and Quebec, and on Canada as a whole.

Mark Carney gave a statement to the press and it was subdued. He laid out the lines that this is unjustified, unfair, and ultimately hurts both countries. What was absent was the feeling that we were going to thump Trump over the head with counter tariffs. Sure, they are coming, but as Carney admitted last week - there's really little we can do and our limits are within sight.

Maybe you think I'm wrong here.

My argument is that Mark Carney knows that he has to set honest expectations on the trade war. He's poised to win a large majority government of 185+ seats. It won't be a minority. He won't be relying on other parties to get legislation through. It will all be on his shoulders.

If he allows himself to be over sold and then under deliver, it will sour the public on his government very quickly. There's no faster way on being a one term Prime Minister than completely failing in the first few months.

Just ask Joe Clark. He didn't even make it a year.

We all recall Doug Ford with this 25% surcharge on electricity that got repealed 3 hours after Trump threatened even worse reprisals. Trump has also threatened worse, again, if he thinks Canada and the EU are working together. Yeah, as insane as that sounds that is what Mark Carney is facing as Prime Minister. I am glad I do not have his job.

That was a muted statement he gave. Sure, we had the lines of we'll endure. We'll prevail. Blah, blah, blah. It was muted though and the reality is, our Canada Goose might be cooked unless someone in the USA can scare some sense into Donald Trump.

Last time it was the big three auto makers that called him up and talked some sense into him. This time he made it clear that they had a month to get their plans together and this is happening.
What can Carney do? Retaliatory tariffs? Yeah, that's the standard play from the book. Sure the government will do that. There's a problem this time.

The Americans that don't want them have no power to change policy, and the Americans that want them (those supporting Trump) don't care that they'll be hurt in the process. They believe a year or two of pain is worth it. You cannot fight a cult member on ideas or with facts or logic.

The problem is our automotive industry cannot handle those kinds of tariffs for a year or two. Six months is going to be brutal. Retaliatory tariffs won't keep Ford and GM plants open after six months and in the USA no one is going to spend $10,000 more for a car made in Canada when the one made in the USA is regular price.

None of this is a slam or an attack on Mark Carney. It is just a very simple statement: he can't make this go away. He can't fix this. Poilievre couldn't fix this either. Nor could Singh, May, or anyone else.

As a few commentators mentioned yesterday, the realization is sinking in that we might be in real trouble.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BC’s Forestry Decline Is a Policy Failure, Not a Market Reality -- Forestry Critic Calls for Accountability and Urgent Policy Reset

Conservative Party of BC Forestry Critic, and Kamloops - North Thompson MLA,  Ward Stamer As the Truck Loggers Association convention begins today, BC Conservative Forestry Critic Ward Stamer says British Columbia’s forestry crisis is the result of government mismanagement, not market forces, and that an urgent policy reset is needed to restore certainty, sustainability, and accountability. “For generations, forestry supported families and communities across BC,” said Stamer.  “Today, mills are closing, contractors are parking equipment, and families are being forced to leave home, not because the resource is gone, but because policy has failed.” Government data shows timber shipment values dropped by more than half a billion dollars in the past year, with harvest levels falling by roughly 50 per cent in just four years. At the same time, prolonged permitting timelines, unreliable fibre access, outdated forest inventories, and rising costs have made long-term planning impossib...

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...

Labels

Show more