Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FORSETH: I had assumed that ICBC was technically to be hands off from the government interference. I was wrong!!


Today, in a media release, ICBC announced ... $110 rebates now on their way to customers 

ICBC has started delivering 3.7 million rebates of $110 to eligible customers. The rebates total $410 million and apply to all personal and commercial customers who had an active eligible Basic insurance policy in January 2025.


ICBC is under the direct control of the provincial government, and they always seem glad to take credit when things are going well.  That of course allows for the government to interfere, in its’ operation, for their own political benefit. Not so much though a few years back, however, when the only thing people could talk about, in reference to ICBC, was that it was ‘dumpster fire’.

I had assumed that ICBC, while under the umbrella of our provincial government, was technically to be hands off from the government interference.  I was wrong!

According to the BC Utilities Commission (BCUC):
'ICBC is a provincial Crown corporation established and owned by the BC government. The BC government may direct ICBC and/or the BCUC to perform certain tasks related to basic automobile insurance. These directives can be issued to the BCUC through special directions or Orders in Council (OIC), on specific actions we must take when regulating ICBC'

Note the highlighted line, '... government may direct ICBC and/or the BCUC to perform certain tasks related to basic automobile insurance'.

That leaves things wide open for the government to do anything it wants to make itself look good -- and to take the credit -- as this quote (from Garry Begg, Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General) from today’s ICBC news release, shows:

"As a result of prudent fiscal management and the strong financial position of ICBC, we have another opportunity to put money back into the pockets of ratepayers,” said Garry Begg, Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General. “This rebate is just one small way for ICBC to give back to its customers as we all navigate global economic uncertainty and increased costs in the face of unjustified tariffs."

What’s with this “we have the opportunity” business?  Is ICBC running the show – or is Minister Biggs in charge of daily operations?


Well I guess, given that the provincial government bailed on their promised $1,000 rebate cheque, they had to have something to play Santa Claus with, hence today’s news that the cheque is in the mail.

The other thing is it will provide a diversion from all the negative news regarding Bill 7, that’s been making headlines for the past week and a half.  One example was in the Times Colonist which headlined their editorial: “Government's Bill 7 is a disgraceful overreach

So, we have a promised $1,000 rebate cheque

Actually delivered? A $110 ICBC rebate

Sorry Premier Eby --- that’s not even close --- it’s little more than a pathetic attempt at slight of hand.

And for those with the least amount of household income, for whom that $1,000 ‘grocery rebate cheque’ would have helped immensely, it does absolutely nothing as many likely do not have an active basic insurance policy.

So Premier Eby ... thanks for nothing.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...

Labels

Show more