Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Canada's Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions Goals? They're a joke. Only New Brunswick and Nova Scotia are on track to meet them



I received an email today, from the Auditor General of Manitoba, which summarizes activities it undertook for 2017 - 2018.  One of the reports was titled, "Perspectives on Climate Change Action in Canada". It's a lengthy report, but one thing stood out as I was glancing through the report on the bottom of page 4, top of page 5 ... it read:

Of the jurisdictions that had 2020 reduction target's, only 2 (New Brunswick and Nova Scotia) were on track to meet them with current actions, based on domestic emission reductions.  In addition, governments were using different baselines years for their targets or were setting different types of targets, such as overall emission reduction targets versus targets for specific sectors of the economy.

Furthermore, governments were using different approaches for reducing emissions and different sources for estimating annual emissions.  As a result, it is unclear how the federal, provincial, and territorial governments would measure, monitor, and report on the individual contributions to meeting Canada's national 2030 target.

Many governments did not have detailed implementation plans to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.  For the most part, auditors found that governments' plans to reduce greenhouse gas emissions consisted of high level goals, with little guidance on how to implement actions.  Details often missing from the plans included timelines, estimates of the reductions expected from individual action items, and information about funding.

The highlighted, and italicized, portions of the above were done by me.  As you look at them, I feel fairly confident you can see why.  If anyone wanted proof that Carbon Taxes being imposed by some provincial governments -- and dictated with an or else sledge hammer by the federal Trudeau government -- those highlighted portions alone are proof they are little more than a tax grab.

Reason enough for Saskatchewan's provincial government to fight action by the federal Liberals from the start, and for them to now be joined by the Ontario provincial government of Conservative Premier Doug Ford

Catherine McKenna, Minister of Environment
and Climate Change in the Justin
Trudeau federal government
Speaking to the CBC last month Canada's
Environment Minister Catherine McKenna called Ontario bailing out of carbon market "sad".  She went on to say, "It's lose-lose: on the environment, lose on the economy ... our (Liberal) government is all in on climate action."

What action?  Canada's Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions Goals?  They're a joke -- and it's borne out by the Manitoba Auditor Generals reports.

Which is at least in part why I believe the premiers of Saskatchewan (Scott Moe) and Ontario (Doug Ford), are similarly "All In" on the fight against Canada's Environment and Climate Change Minister Catherine McKenna.

We agreed today (July 19th) to join forces and use every single tool at our disposal to challenge the federal government’s authority to arbitrarily impose a carbon tax on the people of Ontario and Saskatchewan.

Carbon taxes make life unaffordable for families, and put thousands of jobs at risk. This type of taxation does nothing for the environment and hits people in the wallet in order to fund big government initiatives
."


Is there to much crap going into our environment?  Of course there is; it would be pretty hard to argue that, which is why the need for a genuine and achievable climate strategy is a given.  Simply implementing a tax on carbon that only sucks money out of the pockets of consumers, to then be funneled into government general revenues, is NOT the way to see that happen.

Different targets ... different approaches ... and high level goals with no guidance on how they are to be implemented.  That's the "All In" approach of Justin Trudeau's federal Liberal government. 

It's an all in approach our John Horgan GreeNDP government should abandon, but they (like the previous bc LIBERALS) are too addicted to the money they receive from punitive taxes imposed on us. 


  • Carbon Taxes are doing nothing for the environment of British Columbia ...
  • Carbon taxes make the everyday necessities of life more and more un-affordable for families
  • Carbon taxes put high paying jobs at risk in resource and industry communities where government regulations already are already in place to protect the environment.


As Kerri Simms, of the BC Taxpayers Federation, said this Spring, "The carbon tax is not an accounting exercise for B.C. families. It’s an expensive reality for any Canadian subjected to it.  If taking billions of dollars away from Canadians doesn’t reduce emissions, then, what is the point of this forced carbon tax?"

One can only hope that soon in BC we too will have a premier who will join with Doug Ford and Scott Moe in saying their goal is to, "create good jobs and drive economic growth across the country.”

Hopefully they'll be all-in on that ... and not all-in on finding more and more ways to tax.

In Kamloops, I'm Alan Forseth

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more