Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: Deal with the realities or get out of town ... Victims of Domestic Violence Need Time to Regain a Sense of Personal Security and Self-Esteem



The Liberal government is moving soon on its plan to give federally-regulated workers paid time off to deal with the trauma and turmoil of domestic violence.

Consultations with stakeholders, employers and unions will begin this fall on the proposed benefit, which will allow survivors 10 days off — five of them paid. It's meant to give people time to leave their abusive partners, deal with police, get medical treatment or seek legal advice.

About 900,000 employees in federally regulated private sector workplaces — such as banks, marine shipping, air and rail transportation and telecommunications — will be eligible for the new federal benefit.....


This imitative is disturbing. People suffering from domestic violence are victims, not survivors, which is why the transition from victim to survivor is the sticky part. 


Domestic violence occurs in all economic and social levels. Every sexual orientation is represented; heterosexual, homosexual, lesbian, transgendered and other. People do not need to be married or co-habit to suffer domestic violence.


Providing time off, to leave an abusive situation, is like putting antiseptic cream on a gaping wound. It gives the appearance that federal employees and employees of federally regulated enterprises enjoy entitlements denied to other Canadians. That is inconsistent with government claims that it strongly supports gender and women’s rights.




Over the past three decades, we have had thousands of local non-profit agencies, dedicated to helping domestic violence, victims spring up.   Most of the staff and volunteers are recovered victims themselves, and know the need is staggering.



They are perpetually short of space, food, clothing, supplies and manpower.



They do not have the resources to help a victim to access skills, upgrading, or help with relocation costs that may be necessary to stop a cycle of violence.



They understand the immediate needs of someone fleeing abuse as governments never will.



Time off work is not a top priority for someone fearing loss of life -- or suffering abuse, assault and threats.  Victims need time to regain a sense of personal security, and self-esteem, which is compounded by the fact we do not have adequate counseling services available.  And, the problem is more acute in rural areas, and small centres, where a return to work (or continued residence) may involve re-exposure to the abuser.




Our government must enact legislation that makes violation of a protection order a serious crime, with serious consequences, but we have not even managed to do that.  Even then, protection orders will be useless unless we have police officers free to enforce them, and that is rare.



Grants to non-profits agencies, based on the number of adults and children they take in and support, would be a meaningful start. Adding grants for skills upgrading and relocation where necessary would help. And finally, efforts to provide victims of domestic violence, with access to trauma and psychological counseling, is urgently needed.  


It appears that domestic violence receives cursory attention, and political lip service, until someone is killed. Then we turn our attention to the accused. We have allowed this social infection to fester for far too long.



Proposing a consultation of people far removed from the front lines, in assisting victims of domestic violence, is an exercise of the incompetent undertaking the unnecessary.



Deal with the realities or get out of town.




John Feldsted

Political Consultant & Strategist

Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

GORDON F. D. WILSON: When The Trick Masquerades as The Treat

Thirty-seven years ago, Halloween 1987, I became the leader of the BC Liberal Party.   British Columbia was badly polarized. Social Credit held one side and the NDP the other. It had been twelve years, 1975, since Liberal MLAs Garde Gardom, Pat McGeer, and Alan Williams had walked away from their party to join Social Credit, one year after the lone Progressive Conservative MLA Hugh Curtis had abandoned his party to sit with Bill Bennett, the son and heir apparent to long-serving BC Premier, WAC Bennett.   An unwritten agreement by the biggest Canadian political shareholders, the federal Liberals and Conservatives, decided that if British Columbia was to remain a lucrative franchise from a revenue perspective, they couldn’t risk splitting the electoral vote and electing the real enemy, the NDP, so no resources would be used to finance either a Liberal or Conservative party provincially.   “There are two sides to every street,” I was told by a very prominent Canadian businessman who cont

FORSETH: You Have To Be A Bit Crazy

  Ward and his wife Carleen celebrating his win on election night.   In March of this year, I took on the role of Campaign Manager for BC Conservative candidate Ward Stamer.  It’s the third time I’ve had the opportunity as I took on the role for Peter Sharp in 2013, and for Dennis Giesbrecht in 2020. Now let me tell you, in the past, a BC Conservative campaign team generally consisted of myself, the candidate and one or two helpers – and very little in the way of a campaign budget. Thankfully, a benefit of having spent 30+ years in the broadcast media afforded me the ability to do ad copy and write candidate speeches, and prep both Dennis and Peter to deal with the media – it’s also something I have always enjoyed. That was part of my duties this time around as well, however having a team of a dozen and a half volunteers meant that for the first time we had people available to ID our supporters, put together and install campaign signs, distribute campaign literature, and help out at ou

Rustad will support policy for 'everyday' people, otherwise work to bring down NDP

  Conservative Party of B.C. John Rustad Tuesday (Oct. 29) said his party would support government policies that support "average, everyday working" persons in B.C., but also repeated earlier promises to bring down the B.C. NDP government under Premier David Eby. "If there are things that are moved forward that will improve lives for those people, we would be looking at support it," Rustad said. "But if he's going to carry forward with the destructive policies that he has, then yes, we are going to look at every opportunity possible to bring him down as soon as possible."  CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more