Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: Deal with the realities or get out of town ... Victims of Domestic Violence Need Time to Regain a Sense of Personal Security and Self-Esteem



The Liberal government is moving soon on its plan to give federally-regulated workers paid time off to deal with the trauma and turmoil of domestic violence.

Consultations with stakeholders, employers and unions will begin this fall on the proposed benefit, which will allow survivors 10 days off — five of them paid. It's meant to give people time to leave their abusive partners, deal with police, get medical treatment or seek legal advice.

About 900,000 employees in federally regulated private sector workplaces — such as banks, marine shipping, air and rail transportation and telecommunications — will be eligible for the new federal benefit.....


This imitative is disturbing. People suffering from domestic violence are victims, not survivors, which is why the transition from victim to survivor is the sticky part. 


Domestic violence occurs in all economic and social levels. Every sexual orientation is represented; heterosexual, homosexual, lesbian, transgendered and other. People do not need to be married or co-habit to suffer domestic violence.


Providing time off, to leave an abusive situation, is like putting antiseptic cream on a gaping wound. It gives the appearance that federal employees and employees of federally regulated enterprises enjoy entitlements denied to other Canadians. That is inconsistent with government claims that it strongly supports gender and women’s rights.




Over the past three decades, we have had thousands of local non-profit agencies, dedicated to helping domestic violence, victims spring up.   Most of the staff and volunteers are recovered victims themselves, and know the need is staggering.



They are perpetually short of space, food, clothing, supplies and manpower.



They do not have the resources to help a victim to access skills, upgrading, or help with relocation costs that may be necessary to stop a cycle of violence.



They understand the immediate needs of someone fleeing abuse as governments never will.



Time off work is not a top priority for someone fearing loss of life -- or suffering abuse, assault and threats.  Victims need time to regain a sense of personal security, and self-esteem, which is compounded by the fact we do not have adequate counseling services available.  And, the problem is more acute in rural areas, and small centres, where a return to work (or continued residence) may involve re-exposure to the abuser.




Our government must enact legislation that makes violation of a protection order a serious crime, with serious consequences, but we have not even managed to do that.  Even then, protection orders will be useless unless we have police officers free to enforce them, and that is rare.



Grants to non-profits agencies, based on the number of adults and children they take in and support, would be a meaningful start. Adding grants for skills upgrading and relocation where necessary would help. And finally, efforts to provide victims of domestic violence, with access to trauma and psychological counseling, is urgently needed.  


It appears that domestic violence receives cursory attention, and political lip service, until someone is killed. Then we turn our attention to the accused. We have allowed this social infection to fester for far too long.



Proposing a consultation of people far removed from the front lines, in assisting victims of domestic violence, is an exercise of the incompetent undertaking the unnecessary.



Deal with the realities or get out of town.




John Feldsted

Political Consultant & Strategist

Winnipeg, Manitoba
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more