Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

JOHN FELDSTED: Maxime Bernier had to convince more people than Scheer to give his idea prominence, and he failed to do so


Conservatives gather in Halifax for caucus without Maxime Bernier (Adieu Bernier) -- 'We're going off-message with this Bernier business,' Conservative senator says
~~ John Paul Tasker, CBC News, Aug 23, 2018


Former Conservative MP,
and member for Beauce,
Maxime Bernier
And what is that message, Senator? Inquiring minds want to know. Obviously, the CBC was given the story prior to Bernier’s press conference. The surprise package landed like an ancient J & J Taylor safe – with a resounding thud and no fireworks. 

Maxime Bernier was unable to convince cabinet colleagues, and member delegates, to give his ideas the prominence he felt they deserved. The alleged rift between Bernier and Andrew Scheer is hypothetical. No one knows who said what to whom, and what terms Bernier felt were proper. He had to convince more people than Scheer to give his idea prominence, and he failed to do so.

Without Bernier, the CPC will grow stronger.

Bernier’s penchant for going ‘all in’ is not a desirable trait. It is a high risk move in poker, and usually fatal in politics. A new political party, or movement, takes years to create, and many of us have been there and done that. We are not about to restart from scratch. The CPC needs a wake-up call, but that must come from members speaking to their representatives and party officials.
   
If the conservative party wants to appeal to its base, improve donations, and gather support from those fed up with politics, it must toss political correctness in the trash bin and start communicating in plain, clear English and French.


The election is ours to lose. We have never faced a sitting government in such dismal disarray. If we focus on the disarray, and fail to put forward clear alternatives, we will repeat 2015. In a mud-slinging competition, the Liberals are experts. They take the very worst of their own attributes, and failings, and claim they belong to their opponents.    

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is accusing conservatives of using divisive politics, when that is Liberal stock in trade. Why are we not confronting him, and demanding that he and his MPs cease attending cultural and ethnic events forthwith? They are trolling for votes, not bolstering multiculturalism. Call them out on it.

We need to demand of government why we need their acknowledgement to be who we are, live as we please, and celebrate our culture heritage and history as we wish? Why are we reduced to begging for recognition, and competing for funding, to enjoy our day in the sun?

It makes no sense.

We must ask why cultural, ethic and other groups who are not self-sufficient are worthy of public support. Our culture belongs to us as Canadians. We create it as we evolve. Culture is not static. We are making history with each passing year and the result is an evolving culture.

Ethic culture celebrates on more of a historical basis; a celebration of our roots which is important to gain perspective of how we came to be who we are. Researching the family tree, and celebrating the history of our forebearers, is integral to many Canadians. We can do that without government interference or supervision.

Maxime Bernier chose to abandon ship at a critical event. Where that may take him is another story. In the meantime, I am awaiting developments as the convention gets underway tomorrow.

~~ John Feldsted

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...

Labels

Show more