Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: Sir John A. MacDonald was a flawed figure, as most politicians are


"When fortune empties her chamber pot on your head, smile and say, we are going to have a Summer shower" ~~ Sir John A. MacDonald

 
Sir John Alexander MacDonald
Canada's 1st Prime Minister


Sir John A. Macdonald, despite his flaws, was a monumental force in the creation of our nation. 

He was first elected to the legislature of the Province of Canada in 1844, then in 1857 he became premier of the politically unstable province. By 1884, with the support of George Brown, he undertook formation of a confederation of provinces.  That led to the enactment of the British North America Act in 1867, and the birth of Canada.  He was in fact, a formidable force in the creation of the Dominion of Canada, and in the completion of a transcontinental railway (CPR).

He served as Prime Minister from July 1867 until November 1873, when he resigned due to the Pacific Scandal (this scandal involved government bribery in the building of the Canadian Pacific Railway). Despite this, he was re-elected in 1878, and served until his death in 1891.

I do not apologize for Sir John. He was amongst other things an unethical rascal, and the man who authorized the hanging of Louis Riel. That is part of our history, which is why I am appalled at those who want to erase Sir John’s name from public buildings and tear down statues of the man.

I admit that the residential school system was thoroughly corrupt.  It mistreated the children it was charged with educating, and should have been helping to transition to a better life. We failed our aboriginal people abysmally -- but long after Sir John was dead.

Recent articles have panned him as the architect of the residential schools program, but this is erroneous. Residential schools for aboriginals were first tried in what is now New Brunswick around 1820, but they failed. Residential schools however, were operated in Upper Canada from the 1830s and onward, and they became the template for later schools. During the 1870s plains aboriginals favoured residential schools during treaty negotiations. They felt that would enable their young to learn the skills of the newcomer society, and help them make a successful transition to a world dominated by the strangers. 

Most of those whining that his memory must be erased, have done nothing for the betterment of our society or nation. They are lazy, indolent, uneducated gremlins seeking to destroy what they do not understand and have no knowledge of.

The Victoria City Council members should hang their heads in shame for removing a statue of Sir John. It simply avoided a confrontation with local activists, by engaging in an act of historical vandalism.


A guest Op / Ed piece by John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more