Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: Sir John A. MacDonald was a flawed figure, as most politicians are


"When fortune empties her chamber pot on your head, smile and say, we are going to have a Summer shower" ~~ Sir John A. MacDonald

 
Sir John Alexander MacDonald
Canada's 1st Prime Minister


Sir John A. Macdonald, despite his flaws, was a monumental force in the creation of our nation. 

He was first elected to the legislature of the Province of Canada in 1844, then in 1857 he became premier of the politically unstable province. By 1884, with the support of George Brown, he undertook formation of a confederation of provinces.  That led to the enactment of the British North America Act in 1867, and the birth of Canada.  He was in fact, a formidable force in the creation of the Dominion of Canada, and in the completion of a transcontinental railway (CPR).

He served as Prime Minister from July 1867 until November 1873, when he resigned due to the Pacific Scandal (this scandal involved government bribery in the building of the Canadian Pacific Railway). Despite this, he was re-elected in 1878, and served until his death in 1891.

I do not apologize for Sir John. He was amongst other things an unethical rascal, and the man who authorized the hanging of Louis Riel. That is part of our history, which is why I am appalled at those who want to erase Sir John’s name from public buildings and tear down statues of the man.

I admit that the residential school system was thoroughly corrupt.  It mistreated the children it was charged with educating, and should have been helping to transition to a better life. We failed our aboriginal people abysmally -- but long after Sir John was dead.

Recent articles have panned him as the architect of the residential schools program, but this is erroneous. Residential schools for aboriginals were first tried in what is now New Brunswick around 1820, but they failed. Residential schools however, were operated in Upper Canada from the 1830s and onward, and they became the template for later schools. During the 1870s plains aboriginals favoured residential schools during treaty negotiations. They felt that would enable their young to learn the skills of the newcomer society, and help them make a successful transition to a world dominated by the strangers. 

Most of those whining that his memory must be erased, have done nothing for the betterment of our society or nation. They are lazy, indolent, uneducated gremlins seeking to destroy what they do not understand and have no knowledge of.

The Victoria City Council members should hang their heads in shame for removing a statue of Sir John. It simply avoided a confrontation with local activists, by engaging in an act of historical vandalism.


A guest Op / Ed piece by John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...

Labels

Show more