Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

So am I a Canadian … or a hyphenated Canadian? And if hyphenated Canadian, am I Canadian first or second?


I find it interesting to note, given all of the recent hypocrisy about racial intolerance, the words to the national anthem of our country.



O Canada!
Our home and native land!
True patriot love

In all thy sons command.
With glowing hearts

We see thee rise,
The True North strong and free!
From far and wide,
O Canada,

We stand on guard for thee.
God keep
our land

Glorious and free!
O Canada,
we stand on guard for thee.
O Canada,
we stand on guard for thee.





The ONLY words used to describe the people of Canada are …. OUR … and WE.  “Our” being the people of this country … and “We” as the group, or collection, of the entire population.  No where in the words to OUR national anthem do I see WE being a collection of hyphenated Canadians – at least not where hyphenated we are Canadian second.



The 2016 Census of Population questions, long form (National Household Survey), asked a number of questions around our ethnic backgrounds. They included:
#17  What are the ethnic, or cultural, origins of this person’s ancestors.

For example, Canadian, English, Chinese, French, East Indian, Italian, German, Scottish, Cree, Mi'kmaq, Salish, Métis, Inuit, Filipino, Irish, Dutch, Ukrainian, Polish, Portuguese, Vietnamese, Korean, Jamaican, Greek, Iranian, Lebanese, Mexican, Somali, Colombian, etc.



#19  Is this person:

White, South Asian (East Indian, Pakistani, Sri Lankan, etc.), Chinese, Black, Filipino, Latin American, Arab, Southeast Asian (Vietnamese, Cambodian, Laotian, Thai, etc.), West Asian (Iranian, Afghan, etc.), Korean, Japanese, Other (please specify)



Note, the very first option to question #17 is whether my ethnic background is Canadian.  Now don’t get me wrong, there is nothing wrong with asking (or knowing) what the ethnic backgrounds of our country are.  Over the decades we have become a rich colourful fabric woven of many backgrounds … from all over the world.  It seems to me however, that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, is bound and determined to wipe out any choice of being simply a Canadian.




So, am I a Canadian … or a hyphenated Canadian?  And if hyphenated Canadian, am I Canadian first or second?  For example, a Canadian of Italian descent … OR … an Italian–Canadian.  In my opinion, I live in Canada … I am a Canadian, therefore I am a Canadian of Italian descent. 



Question 19, at least in my opinion, runs the risk of setting up stronger ethnic bounds, rather than identifying as a Canadian first, and secondly of whatever proud heritage we may have.



John Diefenbaker, our countries 13th Prime Minister said, "I have one love - Canada; one purpose - Canada's greatness; one aim - Canadian unity from the Atlantic to the Pacific."



He also said, "I am the first Prime Minister of this country of neither altogether English nor French origin. So, I determined to bring about a Canadian citizenship that knew no hyphenated consideration."



However, our Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, believes, “There is no core identity, no mainstream in Canada



Which is likely brought about the recent Twitter wars, with a gang-up, by some, on Maxime Bernier.  He was right – he is right – in what he has said over the past few days on this topic of a Canadian identity, and it’s diversity!



Trudeau’s extreme multiculturalism and cult of diversity will divide us into little tribes that have less and less in common



More diversity will not be our strength, it will destroy what has made us such a great country.”



Which again leads back to what type of hyphenated Canadian we will be.  Because “… identity politics simply panders to another group to be bought off with promises, generally never kept!



Maxime Bernier went on to also say: “Identity politics has become pervasive and is being practiced by all political parties trying to buy votes. Political debate has degenerated into a contest between different ways of pandering to specific groups instead of appealing to our common interests.”



Canadian citizens have rights and responsibilities, and they come to us from our history.  They are secured by Canadian law… and they reflect our shared traditions, identity, and values. And, according to the government of Canada, our Rights and Responsibilities as Canadian citizens include the protection of our Multicultural make-up.  Our multi-culturalism is a fundamental characteristic of the Canadian heritage and identity. Canadians celebrate the gift of one another’s presence and work hard to respect pluralism and live in harmony.



John Diefenbaker had it partially right when he said, “I determined to bring about a Canadian citizenship that knew no hyphenated consideration."

Hyphenated Canadians, YES … but second after FIRST being a Canadian.  We as Canadians do have a core identify, it’s that our country was, and is, made up of a rich fabric of people from all walks of life.  And we should, and do celebrate that rich diversity.

Despite what Prime Minister Justin Trudeau may say, that IS what is mainstream in Canada.  Which brings me back to what I started with, and the words of our National Anthem:



The ONLY words used to describe the people of Canada are …. OUR … and WE.  “Our” being the people of this country … and “We” as the group, or collection, of the entire population.  No where in the words to OUR national anthem do I see WE being a collection of hyphenated Canadians – at least not where we are Canadian second.



The late Stompin’ Tom Connors may have said it best, in the song Believe in YourCountry:



If you don’t believe your country,

Should come before yourself

You can better serve your country

By living somewhere else





In Kamloops, I’m Alan Forseth.  I am a proud Canadian, and a muddle of ethnicities from Scandinavian, Saskatchewan Plains Indian, Scottish, Italian, and heaven knows what else.  And I am proud my forebears decided to make Canada their home.

Comments

  1. Cultural diversity is only valuable when cultures respect one another and work together for the common good of our communities, provinces and country. When cultural groups compete for power and prestige, democracy is at risk and civil war is on the horizon.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good article, Al.
    I once got a detention in school for answering "Canadian" to a question of origin. At that time it wasn't even an option. Lol. To this day I refuse to answer anything but Canadian. I am proud of my family's background and my heritage. As everyone else should be too. I am always delighted and enriched when someone cares enough to share their heritage with me. We are all immigrants, even the indigenous peoples came here for a better life long ago. And, I love when they share their heritage. Together, we are the "we" of our national anthem. Together we determine our future.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for taking the time to comment Dave, and for sharing what I believe are the sentiments of most Canadians!

      Delete
  3. Bravo ! And thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Even if this ethnic identity thing were true there are plenty of things people define themselves by besides their racial / ethnic heritage. I'm a father, I'm a man of faith, I'm a small businessman, I vote for ____ party. As for ethnicity is the Irish part of me supposed to hate the English side or the French the German side? Is the Polish side of my wife supposed to hate the German side of me? (some days I wonder) My point is that ethnicity alone does not define who I am or how I vote and you sell me and most of the Canadian population short if you think it does.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more