Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

DIETER DUDY -- Unfulfilled promises are considered an abrogation of trust and that is counter to what any elected official has declared an oath to prevent


A fellow Kamloops City councillor had a recent post wherein he asked what people considered that politicians, in general, could do to build more trust in those they serve and represent. This is a valid, fair, though difficult question.
His post received many cogent and thoughtful replies and I’d just like to add my perspective if I may.

There have been, and still are, politicians that have and continue to put their own interests ahead of those of the public they serve. 

This tends to happen more often in larger political arenas than in what’s found at the local level. The sad reality, however, is that the average citizen doesn’t differentiate between levels of government and sees them all painted with the same brush. 

In their mind when it comes to corruption, local, provincial, or federal, a bad apple just goes to show just how broken our system is.

As a politician, my trying to convince you that this behaviour is not indicative of the whole nor as pervasive as you might think would only be seen as an expected defensive reaction. Therefore, I’m going to take off my political hat and try to answer the original question as a tax-paying member of our community ... “What do politicians in general need to do to engender more trust in those they serve?”

First off ... don’t lie.

Quite often politicians are placed in positions where they can’t be completely transparent. This may be a result of confidentiality agreements, land deals, labour negotiations, legal proceedings to name a few.

Key here though is that rather than beating around the bush - so to speak - it is far more prudent to just admit that you can’t speak on the matter. Not being able to comment is not lying, however, attempting to sugar coat in an effort to appease can be perceived as being just that.

Second ... don’t promise the moon, stars, galaxies or the universe if you can’t deliver.

Whether it’s lower taxes, new infrastructure, variances, electoral reform, etc ... it’s impossible to walk back from promises that aren’t kept. It is far better to say that you will consider these issues and bring them forward to whichever level of government you represent in an attempt to address them.

Never guarantee outcomes. Unfulfilled promises are considered an abrogation of trust and that is counter to what any elected official has declared an oath to prevent.


Third ... be available.

Whether in person, by phone, mail, social media, just be there. Be prepared to listen, consider, and bring forward without committing to outcomes. Recognize your role as one of many, advocate for those you serve and debate on the merits of the issues. 

Politicians serve at the will of the people ... primarily because they have convinced enough people that they share common core beliefs and concerns. Once elected however, their responsibility is not just to those who have elected them but to the overall community, province, federation.

Positions change as a result of new information, compelling debate, clearer perspectives. Recognizing that it illustrates how your elected official is open-minded on all issues in the interests of determining what serves the populace while considering every voice. 

In closing, while answering the original question ...

The way to instill trust is not to be swayed by emotion -- not to be guided by threats -- not take the politically expedient route -- but give due consideration, listen unbiasedly, deliberate fairly, and finally take comfort in the fact that you have above all been honest and are willing to face your public every day.
Kamloops City Councilor
Dieter Dudy

 
ABOUT Dieter Dudy:

Dieter was born in Germany and raised in Kitimat.  He met his wife Deb Kellogg, who grew up in Kamloops, in Victoria and has been married for 34+ years. They have two adult children. 

His passion for sustainability led him to purchase and develop a 10-acre property where he and Deb have successfully established an organic vegetable farm and business.

Elected in November of 2014, Dieter is also a Councillor with the City of Kamloops.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more