Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

CHARLIE ANGUS -- You might think this is an argument of apples and oranges. First Nation people know better


On the weekend federal NDP MP Charlie Angus posted the following on his Facebook page. While there are several things I take exception to, there are also a number of points very much worthy of consideration regarding the situation our country has found itself in over the past 2 weeks – and longer going back in recent and past history.



Here is what he had to say ...




The railway blockades across the country have shaken up the political and business establishment in Canada. There are millions of opinions floating around Facebook and Twitter about the meaning of these protests. The media pundits seem absolutely shocked. Talking heads for the right-wing are denouncing these actions as mob rule, but none of them have a credible plan for defusing the situation. On the centre / left the focus has been on who is the legitimate voice of authority in the Wet’suwet’en lands. And as the Toronto Star pleaded, "There are growing calls for somebody to do something."

My friends, we are witnessing an extraordinary moment in Canadian history.

If you spend any time in First Nation communities, you won't be surprised at this unprecedented challenge to the status quo. It's been brewing for a long time. And if you have the opportunity to talk with young people who are growing increasingly angry about political lip service on the environmental crisis, you'll see why the RCMP move against the Wet’suwet’en blockade touched off a perfect storm. 

RULE OF LAW ... 

First off, I will say that I have real concerns about the impacts on rail traffic in Canada by the blockades. But as I sat with St. Anne's Residential School survivors this week, they put the government's lines on the rule of law in perspective. "People are being inconvenienced," one of the elders said, "We First Nation people had our lives ruined, and nobody ever worried about what happened to us."

The fact that the survivors were in court yet again, to deal with a government that suppressed thousands of pages of police evidence regarding the horrific crimes committed against the children in this brutal institution. Justice Department lawyers have gone out of their way to have the cases thrown out for a lack of "evidence". Such actions speak volumes about how Canada's notion of legal fairness doesn't seem to include Indigenous Canadians.

You might think this is an argument of apples and oranges. First Nation people know better.

While the media were obsessing over the future of the (Coastal GasLink) LNG pipeline, the Assembly of First Nations (AFN) was announcing that they are fed up with the federal government's obstruction on the human rights tribunal ruling of "reckless discrimination" against First Nation kids in the broken child welfare system. The AFN is now suing Canada for $10 billion for the ongoing damage being done to this generation of First Nation children. I can't remember ever reading an article from the National Post crowd about the abuse of rights of First Nation children and the refusal of government to respect their treaty and legal duties.

The establishment doesn't have a clue about why these protests have taken off so quickly. My gut feeling is that First Nation people are rising up across the country because they are tired of a status quo that overrides their rights and territories daily. 

ENVIRONMENTAL RECKONING ... 
It could have been the LNG pipeline. It could have been the approval of the Teck Frontier tar sands project. It could have been the building of TMX pipeline. A confrontation moment has been brewing in Canada for some time. People hear the words of the Trudeau government on getting serious about the environmental crisis, but they don't see any real action being taken.




Canada is a petrostate, and much of our national discourse remains focused on the needs of the oil industry. How many articles have you seen telling us that approving Teck Frontier is "win-win" while turning it down will lead to more western alienation?

The mushy middle position is that the Liberal government promises to get to "net-zero" emissions someday by planting trees. And yet year in, year out the emissions continue to rise.

I spoke to a young woman who is heading out to the protests this weekend. I asked what motivated her. She replied, "When I saw the convoy of protesters denouncing Greta Thurnberg, I knew it was time to do something. It was the sight of all these grown men in big trucks, honking and attacking a teenager for speaking up on the environment that made me realize that my generation needed to push back."

I find this debate about workers versus the environment deeply troubling. When I was in Alberta, I met energy workers who are deeply committed to leading the transition to renewables and a more sustainable economy. But where is the government to champion those investments? We should not let Jason Kenney and his yellow jacket wexiters be seen as the voice of the working class. In reality, working families in the energy sector are being kept as hostages to further the interests of an out of date 20th-century economic vision. We can do better than this. 

SO, WHERE DOES CANADA GO FROM HERE? 

The LNG issue has morphed into a nationwide showdown on First Nation rights and environmental action. Everyone seems to want to find a quick "solution." The reality is, this is a wake-up call. We need to get serious about the fundamental questions of Indigenous justice and environmental action. There is no more business as usual.

The Greeks have a word – kairos – which means a time of crisis but also one of opportunity. My friends, this is a moment of kairos. Stay confident. Be positive. This is a time of opportunity that could bring Canada forward to a more just place. As the song says, "There's something happening here…"

We're in this together,

Charlie




Charlie Angus has been the Federal Member of Parliament (MP) for the riding of Timmins-James Bay since 2004. He is a member of the New Democratic Party and currently serves as the Vice-Chair of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics and is the NDP Critic for Indigenous and Northern Affairs (Youth). Charlie ran as a candidate in the 2017 NDP Federal Leadership Race.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more