Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

The government stated it was ‘taking action to end hidden ownership’ in order to crack down on tax fraud and close loopholes


In a July 26th, 2018 article in the Georgia Strait, Finance Minister Carole James indicated the provincial government would be ending the corporate secrecy around who owns land in BC – this, permitted under Section 49 of the Business Corporations Act. 

The law as it stood laid out strict legal requirements under which shareholder lists could be obtained from companies ... and it prevented the media from visiting a corporate registered records office to find out who owns a company.

The government stated it was “taking action to end hidden ownership” in order to crack down on tax fraud and close loopholes. It also stated that due to many parts of the Act involve taxation matters, the Ministry of Finance would be directing the process.

According to North Vancouver - Lonsdale NDP MLA Bowinn Ma the legislation was to be introduced by that Fall. Well it actually took longer however -- April 2nd of the following year in fact – before the NDP government of Premier John Horgan did introduce changes to the Business Corporation Act, to keep ‘transparency registers’. 

A month and a half later (May 16th) the Landowner Transparency Act (Bill 23) received royal assent. The actual amendments, however, will not take place until May 1st – twenty-one months after NDP MLA Bowinn Ma was quoted saying “Hidden real estate ownership in BC is soon coming to an end”.

Regardless of what to some might consider to be a long delay, according to the Expert Panel on Money Laundering in Real Estate ... the disclosure of beneficial ownership is the “single most important measure” that can be taken to combat money laundering. 

When asked, the Ministry of Finance indicated to me that, “Both the land owner transparency registry and the BC private business ownership registry were recommended as actions by the Expert Panel on Money Laundering in BC Real Estate, and these changes would establish BC as a national leader on actions to battle money laundering”.

I was also told that, “The recommendations in the Expert Panel report represent fundamental shifts in how government can bring in systemic changes to eliminate illegal money that hurts BC communities”.

After receiving the report, which runs nearly 200 pages, and recommendations from the panel of professionals, I wondered why the government is now seeking input (to be submitted by mid-March) from the public? 

I also wondered how, and to what degree, will this information be used?

According to the Ministry of Finance ... these consultations may result in policy changes that affect a broad range of businesses, professions and sectors – each with their own needs and challenges.

“It’s important that we hear from them directly to hear what their concerns are, what support they need and how we can work together to end money laundering in our economy”, I was told.

So, with the additional consultations, now with the public, underway … I wondered what is the hoped-for outcome? I also wondered why the Land Owner Transparency Registry (LOTR), is a separate entity from the business registry?

In response, I was told that … while there is some overlap between the two, they target different entities.


The LOTR is targeting anonymous owners of BC real estate (whether through a trust, a corporation or partnership). Meantime ... the company registry is focused on all private BC companies incorporated under the Business Corporations Act ... it’s a registry which is not associated with land.

“Money laundering in our economy must end,” said James. “These consultations are an opportunity for the public to voice concerns around how we can prevent dirty money from coming into our communities through these channels and create a better, safer British Columbia”.

She then continued, “I encourage the public, and BC businesses, to provide their valuable input by March 13, 2020”.

Hopefully the feedback will indeed provide valuable insights for the government to consider, as they review existing legislation to combat and reduce money laundering.

To provide feedback to the Policy and Legislation Division by electronic mail at BCABO@gov.bc.ca.  Please note that it is recommended that prior to doing that, you review the consultation document.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more