Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

KING – You made a choice to break the law and, as such, you are eligible for all the consequences that breaking the law entails


There seems to be a lot of confusion online about whether recent protests are illegal or legal. 

Our system allows, nay, encourages protest. 

But that doesn't mean that all protest is legal. Should you choose to break the law while protesting you have broken the law. 

Let’s use an exaggeration to make my point.

Were I to hit a gentleman over the head with a ball peen hammer, and claim it is a protected form of protest, the police and the courts would make short work of my claims; I would go to prison.

There are two clear forms of protest:

1) uncivil obedience … and …
2) civil disobedience

In the former you follow the laws. You stay on public lands not harming others and make you case heard. That is a legal protest fully protected under our laws

Civil disobedience, meanwhile, is the deliberate choice to break the law, on the understanding that it will amplify your protest. It amplifies your protest because you are literally breaking the law, and there are consequences for committing civil disobedience

If you commit civil disobedience, there is a reasonable chance in this day and age that the police will simply wait you out and will not charge you -- but that doesn't mean you haven't broken the law. You are still eligible for arrest and fines and …  


Complaining that you don't want to be arrested is not really an option. You made a choice to break the law and, as such, you are eligible for all the consequences that breaking the law entails. 

If you don't want to risk arrest, and charges, stick to uncivil obedience.

So, folks stop with this vacuous "protest is legal" thing you keep posting everywhere.

Legal protest is legal … and illegal protest is illegal.

Do the former you are fine, do the latter, and you have no right or justification to complain.

Thus, endeth the lesson.


Blair King is a Professional Chemist and a resident of the Township of Langley, British Columbia. He is a husband, the father of three great kids, and is, as he says, ‘trying to make a better world for his kids’.  

I have come to recognize that a lot of important decisions are being made by people who lack the basic understanding of science to make informed decisions. My fear is that we continue to waste our moral and financial capital, on emotionally-charged and scientifically-indefensible projects, leaving us without anything to spend when it comes to making real changes that can make tangible improvements locally, regionally and nationally.

‘Pragmatic and details-oriented because facts matter in this field’

Blair blogs at A Chemist in Langley.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

“4.5 million hectares of forest lands have burned since 2023, and the best they can do is point to a 90-hectare block being salvaged?” ~~ Ward Stamer, Kamloops-North Thompson MLA

Today, BC NDP forest Minister Ravi Parmar made this pronouncement; ‘Removing red tape has sped up permitting, allowing for more wood to be salvaged, quicker’. 4.5 million hectares of forest lands have burned since 2023, and the best they can do is point to a 90-hectare block?    ~~ BC Conservative Forests Critic Ward Stamer While acknowledging the NDP government has recognized improvements were needed in permitting and accessing burnt fibre in a timely fashion, the reality is, they are barely making a dent in the problem.  This government's recognition that only seven percent of pulp mill fibre came from burnt timber in 2024-25, quite simply put, is a failure. And the recent announcement, just three weeks ago, that the Crofton Pulp Mill would be permanently closing, is proof of that.     Instead of Premier David Eby’s government addressing core issues being faced by British Columbia’s forest industry, they are doing little more than manipulating the facts, ...
1 comment
Read more

A message from BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer, and the Kamloops – North Thompson Riding Association

2025 was a busy first year. As a Caucus, we worked very hard to defeat Bills 14 and 15, legislation which allows the provincial government to move ahead without environmental assessments on renewable projects, and that also allows cabinet to build infrastructure projects without getting approval from local municipal governments. This is not acceptable to your BC Conservative caucus, and we will continue to press this government for open and transparent projects in the future.  Two things we had success in were having the first Private Members bill passed in over 40 years. The first was Jody Toors Prenatal and Post Natal Care bill, and then there was my private members Bill M217 Mandatory Dashcams in commercial vehicles (passed second reading unanimously and is heading to Committee in February). Regrettably, much of the legislation passed by the government was little more than housekeeping bills, or opportunities to strengthen the ability of Cabinet Ministers to bypass the BC legi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Wildfire waste plan torched -- Forestry critic Stamer calls BC's wildfire salvage rate 'a failure'

Claims that BC is making progress salvaging wildfire-damaged timber are masking deeper problems in the forest sector, the province’s forestry critic says. Last week, BC’s Ministry of Forests said mills in the province processed more than one million cubic metres of wildfire chips in 2024-25, up from 500,000 cubic metres in 2023 and representing about seven per cent of all processed wood. Kamloops-North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer said those claims of progress ignore the reality that only a fraction of burned timber is being used ... CLICK HERE for the full story
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more