Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

KING – You made a choice to break the law and, as such, you are eligible for all the consequences that breaking the law entails


There seems to be a lot of confusion online about whether recent protests are illegal or legal. 

Our system allows, nay, encourages protest. 

But that doesn't mean that all protest is legal. Should you choose to break the law while protesting you have broken the law. 

Let’s use an exaggeration to make my point.

Were I to hit a gentleman over the head with a ball peen hammer, and claim it is a protected form of protest, the police and the courts would make short work of my claims; I would go to prison.

There are two clear forms of protest:

1) uncivil obedience … and …
2) civil disobedience

In the former you follow the laws. You stay on public lands not harming others and make you case heard. That is a legal protest fully protected under our laws

Civil disobedience, meanwhile, is the deliberate choice to break the law, on the understanding that it will amplify your protest. It amplifies your protest because you are literally breaking the law, and there are consequences for committing civil disobedience

If you commit civil disobedience, there is a reasonable chance in this day and age that the police will simply wait you out and will not charge you -- but that doesn't mean you haven't broken the law. You are still eligible for arrest and fines and …  


Complaining that you don't want to be arrested is not really an option. You made a choice to break the law and, as such, you are eligible for all the consequences that breaking the law entails. 

If you don't want to risk arrest, and charges, stick to uncivil obedience.

So, folks stop with this vacuous "protest is legal" thing you keep posting everywhere.

Legal protest is legal … and illegal protest is illegal.

Do the former you are fine, do the latter, and you have no right or justification to complain.

Thus, endeth the lesson.


Blair King is a Professional Chemist and a resident of the Township of Langley, British Columbia. He is a husband, the father of three great kids, and is, as he says, ‘trying to make a better world for his kids’.  

I have come to recognize that a lot of important decisions are being made by people who lack the basic understanding of science to make informed decisions. My fear is that we continue to waste our moral and financial capital, on emotionally-charged and scientifically-indefensible projects, leaving us without anything to spend when it comes to making real changes that can make tangible improvements locally, regionally and nationally.

‘Pragmatic and details-oriented because facts matter in this field’

Blair blogs at A Chemist in Langley.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...
Post a Comment
Read more

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more