Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

RESOURCE WORKS -- Another century, another pipeline


In 1956, the Liberal government of Louis St. Laurent was tasked with defending the decision to establish a Crown Corporation in order to build the Trans-Canada Pipeline.

Sound familiar?

The pipeline controversies of 2020 are nothing new. Sixty-four years ago, the Canadian Parliament was in embroiled in a scandal about the financing of the Trans-Canada Pipeline.

The private sector wouldn't invest in the costly project to carry natural gas from Alberta to the East, and a great debate erupted when St. Laurent's government created a Crown Corporation to get the pipeline built. Considerable opposition from the Progressive Conservatives and the CCF threatened to delay construction, and the Liberals moved to limit debate. That decision would cost the Liberals their government.

Thanks to these measures, the bill passed and the pipeline was eventually completed in 1958 -- a real technological accomplishment for the time. But its political consequences were considerable. By 1957, the resulting brouhaha had contributed to the Liberals defeat. 
 
The Honourable John Diefenbaker
The former Minister of Finance, the Hon. Walter Harris, spoke in defense of the project frequently. Once hailed as a potential successor to Prime Minister St. Laurent, his part in the Pipeline Debate contributed to him losing his seat in the '57 election. John Diefenbaker became Prime Minister.

Today, as in the past, vociferous debates over inter-provincial energy infrastructure routinely lay bare Canada's regional divides. 

Seemingly no less controversial than the one in 1956, construction for this inter-provincial pipeline is nevertheless well underway. (Even BC Premier John Horgan has conceded that it will be built.)

Honourable Walter Harris
Below is the abridged text of the Honourable Walter Harris' remarks from a radio broadcast on Friday, June 15, 1956. (Published by the National Liberal Federation - Ottawa, Canada. Archival materials courtesy of BC Women's Liberal Commission, 2020.)

----------------

Parliament and the Pipeline

After a stormy passage through Parliament, the Pipe Line Bill became law a week ago. In spite of all the reports in the newspapers and on the radio, many people I meet do not yet seem to know what the Bill was all about.

Here are the facts: the Pipe Line Bill established a Crown Company to do two things. The first is to lend up to $80 million to a Canadian company called Trans-Canada Pipe Lines. This is estimated to be 90 per cent of the cost of building a natural gas pipe line across the prairies from Alberta to Winnipeg.

Taxpayers Cannot Possibly Lose

The pipe line is to be started at once and completed to Winnipeg by the end of the year, and the Company has to pay back the loan with interest at 5 per cent by the beginning of April next year. If the Company fails to pay - the Government can get the pipe line for 90 per cent of its cost. If the Company pays off the loan, the Crown Corporation will use the $80 million to help build another section of the pipe line across northern Ontario,

The pipe line is northern Ontario will be built in partnership with the Conservative government of Ontario and will be rented to Trans-Canada Pipe Lines at a good rental. The Ontario Government have agreed to put up $35 million of the cost of this section, which might run to $130 million.

If it is a good thing to have a natural gas pipe line from Alberta to Ontario and Quebec - and we in the government believe it is - the Canadians taxpayers cannot possibly lose on this deal.


The Conservative and the C.C.F. parties fought the Pipe Line Bill in Parliament, and the Social Credit party supported it. The Conservatives and the C.C.F. called it a give-away programme. It is nothing of the kind.

For the prairie section of the line, the Government will either get back the money with good interest or we could get a pipe line at a bargain price. The Opposition has added together the $80 million loan for the prairies and the $130 million cost of the line in northern Ontario and pretended the Government was going to help out a private company to the extent of $200 million.

The truth is that if Trans-Canada does not repay the $80 million, they won't have the pipe line, and the northern Ontario section will certainly not be leased to them. Our contract allows us to take over the prairie pipe line - and we would not have agreed to a loan except on those terms. 

The Future Belongs To Us

Under these circumstances the sooner the job was started the better. The time has gone by when Canada can afford to wait; the future belongs to us and any government which hesitates to take steps to keep our expansion growing would not be doing its duty to the Canadian people. To sum up -- wait another year -- perhaps longer -- or get on with the job. We think getting on with the job is the Canadian way.















Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more