Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FORSETH: Rural BC, hard hit by the critical state of BC’s forest industry, isn’t going to develope any ‘substantial new tourism opportunities’ from this infusion of money


Rural communities affected by mill closures throughout British Columbia will benefit from $1 million in funding to develop tourism opportunities, creating new jobs for people – so says the BC NDP government of Premier John Horgan.
British Columbia is an amazing place with unparalleled natural beauty that we are proud to invite the world to come explore”, said Premier John Horgan. 

This tourism investment will help bring new visitors to rural communities throughout the province, while also helping diversify and boost local economies.”

According to a recent government media release, this funding will be provided to the five regional destination marketing organizations (RDMOs). Each RDMO** will receive $200,000 in catalyst funding to support strategic planning and destination development in rural communities impacted by mill closures.

I also feel like the communities that are the most affected, by the forestry issues, are not the ones that are currently being promoted internationally. Most tourism promotion has gone to Whistler, Tofino, and some of the skiing operations in the interior ... but very little for the mom and pops that run small independent BC tourism operations



For many years Destination BC, Hello BC, and all 5 regional tourism associations -- have been developing, marketing and promoting their areas of the province to the world – have they not?  As someone who was part of an independent online company marketing British Columbia for the first decade of the 2000’s, I can say that is indeed what they were doing.

So, I take umbrage with the comments of Lisa Beare, Minister of Tourism, Arts and Culture, when she says that;

This funding will help rural communities impacted by mill closures develop new tourism opportunities, create good-paying jobs and give residents access to all
the things that make an area attractive to visitors.”

 
NO, it will not.  Rural BC, hard hit by the critical state of BC’s forest industry, and suffering from the loss of thousands of jobs, isn’t (at least in my opinion) going to develope any ‘substantial new tourism opportunities’ from this infusion of money.

Additionally, communities such as Merritt, Clearwater and Wells Grey, Mackenzie, Chasm near Clinton -- and a dozen others forest dependent communities and regions -- already have active hard-working marketing and tourism organizations outside of the centralized RDMO’s.

Pardon my language, but one million dollars isn’t going to do jack-shit towards what Horgan claims will develop tourism opportunities ... and create new jobs for people.

Someone who’s been in business and tourism for over two decades (we’ll call them Mr. Jack Pine) said to me; “This current initiative seems like it's more for show, than a serious effort at promoting BC tourism”.

Mr. Pine continued, “I also feel like the communities that are the most affected, by the forestry issues, are not the ones that are currently being promoted internationally. Most tourism promotion has gone to Whistler, Tofino, and some of the skiing operations in the interior ... but very little for the mom and pops that run small independent BC tourism operations”.

 There is some hard work being done by dedicated people in local associations, but too often the rules of participation and funding are dictated by those at the provincial level, who simply do not understand or appreciate the needs of the vast majority of smaller rural and wilderness operators.



Let me just say it seems like governments (pick one, any one) will spend inordinate amounts of money on ‘planning’ in all manner of things, when common sense instead could be used for a tenth the cost, and the remaining 90 per cent could instead be used in the actual delivery of programs and services. 

So, if the intent is to indeed create more tourism jobs in these areas (rather then just say nice words that sound good), what is needed is a promotional campaign targeted to specific countries, that zeroes in on the warmth and hospitality, the cultural events, the recreational opportunities, luxury holidays, and so much more, that is available in these hard hit communities and regions of the province.

And, as Jack stated to me ... if the $200,000 -- with no strings attached so they can do what needs to be done, in the way it needs to be done -- it may well have some impact. 

Following this advise might actually create more jobs – at least in tourism – but as for getting BC’s forest industry off life support however?  Not so much.

Oh, and one final thing from Jack Pine ...
“Let's just throw a million dollars at it, and we can say we have done something.



Meanwhile we'll keep cutting old growth forests, spraying interior forests with poisonous herbicides, destroying vital wildlife habitat in a war against aspens and replacing bio diverse natural forests with unnatural, flammable, monoculture tree farms. 

BC's formerly pristine wilderness was our greatest tourism asset. Protecting our forests, waterways and wildlife is the greatest contribution the BC government can make to tourism.

A million dollars thrown at it doesn't address the real problem”.



** There are five RDMOs in B.C.:
Cariboo Chilcotin Coast – www.landwithoutlimits.com
Kootenay Rockies – www.krtourism.ca
Northern B.C. – www.travelnbc.com
Thompson Okanagan – www.totabc.org
Vancouver Island – www.tourismvi.ca

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more