Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED – By not re-electing as many incumbents as possible, we send a powerful message to political parties to listen to us or suffer the consequences


 

In a previous post, I listed several questions we can put to candidates in the next election to sort out which of them will best represent us. The objective is to ignore the canned talking points candidates have from their political party and talk about issues important to us.

Included on the list was:   

  
     Are you and your party prepared to:

  1. resurrect the oil and gas sector and make provisions to build the infrastructure required to restart this vital engine of our economy;
  2. sharply downsize the PMO and require the government to be run by the Cabinet and Caucus rather than by hired strategists and PR people;
  3. restructure the equalization program to be fair to all provinces;
  4. accept the responsibilities given you under Section 91 of the Constitution and act on them as primary policies;
  5. rescind the Lobbying Act and enforce criminal code prohibitions on anyone, including political party officials, from influencing elected and appointed government officials;
  6. split the roles of Attorney General and Minister of Justice to avoid conflicts of interest;
  7. abolish whipped votes and allow elected representatives to vote following their consciences and the wishes of their constituents;
  8. withdraw from the United Nations and the Paris Agreement;
  9. strengthen ties to NATO, NORAD and the Anglosphere;
  10. simplify the Income Tax Act to a plain language document any taxpayer can understand;
  11. ban foreign-funded Non-Profits from Canada;
  12. rescind the Official Languages Act and hire based on competence, not linguistic ability; and
  13. honour the constitutional powers of provinces and cease interference therein.

 

The list is not complete, as some of you may have issues not on the list. One subscriber said that I had left out gun control. I submit that the list above can quickly grow to 20 or more, but that involves the risks of getting lost in lists rather than assessing candidates. However, let’s add:

14. reform gun control in collaboration with gun owners to ensure that regulations do not infringe on their Charter rights and freedoms, and constitute the minimum regulations required for safe ownership, storage and use of firearms.

Individuals will have other issues to add to the list. I am open to suggestions.


However, to be effective, I suggest you do not use the entire list when canvassing candidates. Pick the four or five items that are important to you (which may include items not on the above list) and focus on those as they are issues you know and can argue on effectively.

There are some candidates for re-election that deserve our support. They communicate well and try to do their best for their constituents and Canada. Our problem is that they are too few. We need more like them; that is the object of the exercise.


The chances of candidates coming to your door are low. The average population for an electoral district is over 80,000 people and roughly 50,000 households. In a six-week election campaign visiting more than 10% of the district households is not possible.

 

We need to be pro-active and involved. We can contact the candidates by phone or e-mail and put our four or five issues to them. The responses will help us choose the best candidates. If we send or use the entire list, we reduce the chances of a reply. Keep you list short; then a failure to respond is an answer.


 

The incumbent, running for re-election, has no “edge” unless he or she is one of the exceptions we noted above. For the most part, our objective is to select the best of the rest. Party affiliations are not relevant; the candidate is as he or she is our representative in Ottawa. We want people who care about their constituents and care about Canada.

 

By not re-electing as many incumbents as possible, we send a powerful message to political parties to listen to us or suffer the consequences. We also ensure that we will have many new representatives in the House of Commons not stuck in the mud of mindless traditions. We need people unafraid to raise their voices on our behalf.


       “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for
good men to do nothing.” ~~ Edmund Burke

That is the short version. If you follow the link, you will see the comments in full. Although he made his observations in 1770, before the American Revolution, they are relevant 250 years later.

If we want changes in how we are governed, we have to demand them.     

John Feldsted ... is a political commentator, consultant, and strategist. He makes his home in Winnipeg, Manitoba.

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- If having three un-happy MLA’s leave the party, is what it takes to have unity within caucus, then I say, “Fine; let it be so”

Regrettably, in recent days, issues within the Conservative Party of BC have come to the surface resulting in one member being removed from Caucus (Dallas Brodie) and the party, and two others (Tara Armstrong and Jordan Kealy) leaving of their own accord. As of this morning (Saturday March 8th) all three are now sitting as independents in the BC legislature. So, what does that mean? In the last twenty-four hours social media feeds have lit up with support for leader John Rustad, while others have been negative, accusing the party, and Rustad, of being bullies and not standing up for conservative values. Ryan Painter, who has personally worked with John Rustad, had this to say: Since the beginning, he's had one target: the BC NDP. He knows that British Columbians deserve a government that works for them, delivers on their promises, and doesn't tax them into poverty. He believes in his team and the power of a focused opposition. He knows who the enemy is. He knows BC deserves ...
Post a Comment
Read more

WARD STAMER: “Hopefully he’s actually listening to what people have to say, and not just showing up for a photo op”

In his latest travels across the province, BC Forest Minister Ravi Parmar touched down in the Okanagan. A trip essentially, he said, to be on the ground meeting industry people. I read what he had to say, and about how he has been tasked with getting more timber to market. Let me start by saying, “ He hasn’t been tasked. He and Premier Eby guaranteed 45 million cubic metres of available wood fibre – they guaranteed that .” BC Timber Sales is a government agency within the provincial forest’s ministry, which is responsible for managing a portion of the province's Crown timber; specifically, 20 percent of the province's annual allowable cut. Unfortunately, BC Timber Sales did not provide anywhere near that amount last year, it was just 12.2 percent. Three years ago, BC mills cut 52 million metres of wood, bringing in nearly $2 billion dollars to the provincial treasury. That figure doesn’t include the taxes from 55,700 people directly employed in the industry, nor from the tens o...
Post a Comment
Read more

Conservative Opposition demonstrates focused and policy-oriented approach in first four weeks of the legislative session

In the first four weeks of the legislative session, the Conservative Official Opposition has scored significant policy wins as it proves every day that the Conservative team has fresh ideas and real-world experience to bring to the table. At the same time, the NDP government has been listless, struggling to find a policy agenda that addresses the problems that British Columbians are facing. “This NDP government led by David Eby has tried to do everything under the sun to distract from their disastrous fiscal record and the fact that they are utterly out of ideas,” said Conservative Opposition Leader John Rustad. “They’ve tried to use the U.S. President to deflect from their eye-popping $11 billion deficit, the worst business confidence in the country, and the fact that they’ve created almost zero private sector jobs. This is no way to run a province or an economy.” Since the legislative session started on February 18th with the Throne Speech, the opposition...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more