Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: Wrongdoing ... justification ... refusing to divulge details ... shutting down attempts to get at the truth. These are the opposite of an accountable, honest and open government

 

The hare survives using a combination of agility and incredible speed to avoid its enemies. The government of Justin Trudeau is not in the same league as the leporids, but not for lack of trying.

The sunny days, sunny ways promised us in 2015 never materialized. They deteriorated into a series of troubling scandals and behaviour closely related to the hare’s cousin, the rabbit. Rabbits live in underground dens, only appearing when they deem it safe to do so.

The fortress mentality in denying wrongdoing, followed by attempts at justification, then refusing to divulge details and finally shutting down attempts to get at the truth in the SNC-Lavalin, Vice-Admiral Norman and WE charity affairs is the opposite of an accountable, honest and open government.

The deliberate effort to stifle the oil and gas sector is outrageous. Disguising that effort as an environmental initiative is dishonest and self-serving. The loss of billions in investments, tens of thousands of jobs and a significant reduction in Gross Domestic Product (GDP) cannot be justified. That is not in the interest of Canada.

We have endured months of having Trudeau pop out from his Harrington Lake den to announce new tweaks to piecemeal income replacement plans that have no rational framework. Adopting elements of the program on the fly has required adjustments to address many people left out of initial programs.

There is ample evidence that government planning emanates from hired strategists and public relations specialists in the Prime Ministers Office (PMO). It is not credible to imagine that the Throne Speech strategy will aim at the good of the nation rather than positioning for the next election. Benefits for Canadians is secondary.

There is no reason for the federal government to invest in housing, which is a provincial jurisdiction in which the federal government ought not to interfere.

The worst-hit areas are our major cities, notably Toronto (population 6.2 million) and Vancouver (population 2.6 million). Those are large concentrations of voters. The run-away housing prices in those cities are due to bad planning by the civic and provincial governments. Canadians residing elsewhere should not be required to subsidize major urban centres under any circumstances. They made their bed.

The employment insurance program has required an overhaul for decades. It is no longer a plan that provides short-term assistance to people out of work due to circumstances beyond their control. It has evolved into an elaborate social welfare scheme that does not function well for its intended purpose and is increasingly expensive as a result.

Federal efforts to improve child care availability is treading into provincial jurisdictions. Federal programs are concentrated in urban areas. Resident in rural areas, towns and small cities tend to be left out. The hard fact is that politicians get no benefit from a child care ribbon-cutting ceremony in Kindersley, Saskatchewan. That is discriminatory and unfair.

Pushing a green economic resurgence is inconsistent with the need to reignite our economic engines and produce the goods, services and jobs that will ramp up our GDP and get us back on our feet.

A plan for an economic recovery that includes the ball-and-chain of sustainable development is premature and insane. Building a robust economy is the priority. Once we have achieved that, we can consider sustainable development as our economy can survive the increased costs involved.

The meme of “build better” is hollow and meaningless. Build better than what?

Where was our pre-COVID system lacking? If it was lacking, why did the government not address the problems?

We must know precisely what is to be fixed and why. Generalities are not acceptable. Damages to our economy and productivity are government-induced, not due to flaws in the system.

Our futures -- and those of future generations -- are at stake. We need an accurate and precise plan as we advance. The government does not know better than the people governed. Election to political office does not create intelligence, prudence and wisdom.

Governance is a service to the people, not a license to manipulate them. 

 

John Feldsted ... is a political commentator, consultant, and strategist. He makes his home in Winnipeg, Manitoba.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BC’s Forestry Decline Is a Policy Failure, Not a Market Reality -- Forestry Critic Calls for Accountability and Urgent Policy Reset

Conservative Party of BC Forestry Critic, and Kamloops - North Thompson MLA,  Ward Stamer As the Truck Loggers Association convention begins today, BC Conservative Forestry Critic Ward Stamer says British Columbia’s forestry crisis is the result of government mismanagement, not market forces, and that an urgent policy reset is needed to restore certainty, sustainability, and accountability. “For generations, forestry supported families and communities across BC,” said Stamer.  “Today, mills are closing, contractors are parking equipment, and families are being forced to leave home, not because the resource is gone, but because policy has failed.” Government data shows timber shipment values dropped by more than half a billion dollars in the past year, with harvest levels falling by roughly 50 per cent in just four years. At the same time, prolonged permitting timelines, unreliable fibre access, outdated forest inventories, and rising costs have made long-term planning impossib...

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...

Eby government signs another land-use agreement, as they say one thing and do another, during DRIPA chaos

While promising to fix DRIPA, the Eby government continues to quietly sign binding land-use agreements that fundamentally alter how Crown land is governed in British Columbia. On January 15, 2026, the government signed four ministerial orders advancing the Gwa’ni Land Use Planning Project with the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, amending the Vancouver Island Land Use Plan and changing how more than 166,000 hectares of Crown land can be accessed, developed, and managed. “This is Land Act reform by stealth,” said Critic for Indigenous Relations Scott McInnis. “British Columbians already rejected these changes once. In 2024, public backlash forced the NDP to pull its Land Act amendments. Instead of listening, this government has gone underground, signing individual deals behind closed doors, just like we’ve already seen in places such as Squamish, Teẑtan Biny, and across Northwest BC.” “The Premier admits DRIPA ( the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act) is creating ...

Labels

Show more