Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED -- Our response must be a refusal to re-elect those elected drones who are driven by unelected political party officials and strategists

DNR (Do Not Re-elect) is an election strategy aimed at taking the election campaign narrative and approach away from political parties and substituting our own.

We get lost trying to figure out who we should cast our vote for.  We do not trust any party to govern responsibly.

No political party has distinguished itself over the last two decades, and we have suffered through seven federal elections -- starting in 2000:

  1. 37th General Election, November 27, 2000
  2. 38th General Election, June 28, 2004
  3. 39th General Election, January 23, 2006
  4. 40th General Election, October 14, 2008
  5. 41st General Election, May 2, 2011
  6. 42nd General Election, October 19, 2015
  7. 43rd General Election, October 21, 2019

We are weary of weeks of political party’s slagging and sloganing, playing silly political games to score points on social media sites, dozens of insincere promises and no change in governance. We are in for another election within the next two to eight months.

Our political structure is unchanged since the mid-60s. Over the decades, the United Nations has wandered off into a Marxist/Socialist paradise trying to take control over western democracies. Our Prime Minister (Justin Trudeau) embraces that initiative despite the bleak future it bodes for our people.

The world has undergone dramatic changes over the past five decades, but our governments have not. They are failing to meet the challenges we face or adapting to shifting geopolitical powers.

Political parties are focused on internal power struggles. They no longer care about why they are elected and have effectively tossed democratic representation in the trash.

There are a few outstanding Members of Parliament (MPs) who strive to represent the people who elected them and to act in the best interests of us all. We need to recognize them and re-elect them, whatever their political stripe. They form the tiny nucleus of governance conscience and ethics we need to nurture.

The power concentrated in the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) is an insult to democracy. The PMO cannot include the Privy Council. Constitutionally, the Privy Council is a neutral body reporting to the Governor General.

The Clerk of the Privy Council is the head of the Public Service. As part of a neutral Governor General’s Office, the privy council Clerk prevents politicization of the Public Service. The PM and his party and Cabinet cannot put their people in critical positions.

The Cabinet and Caucus should guide the Prime Minister in formulating government policy rather than relying on the advice of highly paid, unelected public relations and political strategy people. We need a government that does things because they are the right thing to do rather than acting primarily to secure re-election.

The opposition has failed us, and over the last two decades, all have been in opposition ranks.

There has been no effort to prioritize the nation’s needs on critical issues such as:

  1. destruction of the oil and gas sector of the economy;
  2. the flight of business investments;
  3. crippling federal regulation in all aspects of business and personal endeavour;
  4. an unjustifiable “equalization” program.
  5. a broken criminal justice system;
  6. a convoluted and mostly incomprehensible tome of an income tax act;
  7. gun and gang violence in urban centres;
  8. indigenous reconciliation;
  9. defense spending; and
  10. federal incursions in provincial jurisdictions;

This list is incomplete but highlights some issues that have been under discussion for decades without any effort to resolve them.

The term ‘government accountability’ is a sick joke. It does not exist in our parliament. Worse, our parliament has chosen to recuse itself for six months rather than carry out the duties its members were elected to address -- and in violation of their oaths of office.

Apparently, elected representatives are not essential to governance during a virus epidemic crisis. By their actions, they are incapable and irrelevant. Where do we turn when those we elected to represent us fail to do their duty?

Turning over unfettered control to a minority government for six months is not democratic. Refusing to sit as a parliament, during a crisis, is not democratic. We need to fight back and insist on a return to democratic governance.

Our response must be a refusal to re-elect those elected drones who are driven by unelected political party officials and strategists. They represent their political party -- and personal interests -- not the public.

We have to bring that era to an end.

John Feldsted ... is a political commentator, consultant, and strategist. He makes his home in Winnipeg, Manitoba.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more