Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FORSETH -- Lower so-called ‘community standards’ in some cases means allowing the selfish needs of adults to take priority over those of children

 


One week ago Mitzi Dean, Minister of Children and Family Development, released a statement regarding a report on fetal alcohol spectrum disorder. In the week since it's release, I have returned, numerous times, to read one of the statements she made – one which bothered me -- a lot!

Here's the statement:

"Structural racism, assumptions and stigma surrounds an FASD diagnosis and can lead to a focus on the origins of FASD rather than on the support children and youth need ..."

Two decades ago, I came face to face with government abdicating their responsibilities around the care of children, especially in this case, infants. Apparently, from what I was told, there were new, and I quote, "community standards" and I needed to get on board with the fact my old white privileged beliefs were out of date.

I’m not going to get into specifics, however let me say this situation, which still continues today, was complete and utter crap.

What in fact was happening was that the government ministries, including those responsible for children, were reducing staff and there were not enough front-line workers to ensure that – in my opinion - babies and infants were placed first and foremost as a priority by parents.

I’ll let you decide what that might have looked like, but I don’t believe you’ll have to think very hard. And it has only gotten worse now as some individuals, who have brought children into this world, spend their days in a drug induced haze spending the little financial resources they have on pot (which they cannot afford) as well as cigarettes and alcohol ... rather than on nourishing food, educational toys, and other things which at one time were considered necessities in providing an environment for children to thrive.

These new so-called ‘community standards’ were, in some cases, little more than allowing the selfish needs of adults to take priority over what should have been providing the best care possible for infants and children.

Which takes me back to my initial comment about being bothered by a statement from Children and Family Development Minister Mitzi Dean...

Ensuring the safety and well-bring of the youngest and most vulnerable of our society is not ‘structurally racist’. A
nd I’m sorry, but if an individual gets their feelings hurt because they are called out for, say inflicting a lifetime of both mental and physical disabilities due to consuming alcohol while pregnant ... well TOO BAD!

We need to – no we must – do better ... and a dumbing down of community standards doesn’t cut it. It should not, and must not, be acceptable.

We need to go back to square one and ensure that young soon-to-be parents are able to access the resources necessary to provide for the healthiest outcomes possible in the birth of their child – including child safe accommodations, nourishing foods and medical care.

We need better education for young people so they know what the outcomes are for infants subjected to drugs and alcohol during pregnancy – they need to know the lifetime of pain they will inflict.

And we need to ensure a full range of services – when they are needed – are available for parents with drug and alcohol addictions.

Having a happy flourishing child ... rather than worrying about hurting the feelings of individuals who may (through their actions and/or inaction) subject a newborn to the heart wrenching issues they’ll suffer due from fetal alcohol syndrome ... must become the priority.

It comes down to a matter of expectations – societal expectations – and those, to me, mean children first. Because like the old saying goes, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more