Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FORSETH -- Lower so-called ‘community standards’ in some cases means allowing the selfish needs of adults to take priority over those of children

 


One week ago Mitzi Dean, Minister of Children and Family Development, released a statement regarding a report on fetal alcohol spectrum disorder. In the week since it's release, I have returned, numerous times, to read one of the statements she made – one which bothered me -- a lot!

Here's the statement:

"Structural racism, assumptions and stigma surrounds an FASD diagnosis and can lead to a focus on the origins of FASD rather than on the support children and youth need ..."

Two decades ago, I came face to face with government abdicating their responsibilities around the care of children, especially in this case, infants. Apparently, from what I was told, there were new, and I quote, "community standards" and I needed to get on board with the fact my old white privileged beliefs were out of date.

I’m not going to get into specifics, however let me say this situation, which still continues today, was complete and utter crap.

What in fact was happening was that the government ministries, including those responsible for children, were reducing staff and there were not enough front-line workers to ensure that – in my opinion - babies and infants were placed first and foremost as a priority by parents.

I’ll let you decide what that might have looked like, but I don’t believe you’ll have to think very hard. And it has only gotten worse now as some individuals, who have brought children into this world, spend their days in a drug induced haze spending the little financial resources they have on pot (which they cannot afford) as well as cigarettes and alcohol ... rather than on nourishing food, educational toys, and other things which at one time were considered necessities in providing an environment for children to thrive.

These new so-called ‘community standards’ were, in some cases, little more than allowing the selfish needs of adults to take priority over what should have been providing the best care possible for infants and children.

Which takes me back to my initial comment about being bothered by a statement from Children and Family Development Minister Mitzi Dean...

Ensuring the safety and well-bring of the youngest and most vulnerable of our society is not ‘structurally racist’. A
nd I’m sorry, but if an individual gets their feelings hurt because they are called out for, say inflicting a lifetime of both mental and physical disabilities due to consuming alcohol while pregnant ... well TOO BAD!

We need to – no we must – do better ... and a dumbing down of community standards doesn’t cut it. It should not, and must not, be acceptable.

We need to go back to square one and ensure that young soon-to-be parents are able to access the resources necessary to provide for the healthiest outcomes possible in the birth of their child – including child safe accommodations, nourishing foods and medical care.

We need better education for young people so they know what the outcomes are for infants subjected to drugs and alcohol during pregnancy – they need to know the lifetime of pain they will inflict.

And we need to ensure a full range of services – when they are needed – are available for parents with drug and alcohol addictions.

Having a happy flourishing child ... rather than worrying about hurting the feelings of individuals who may (through their actions and/or inaction) subject a newborn to the heart wrenching issues they’ll suffer due from fetal alcohol syndrome ... must become the priority.

It comes down to a matter of expectations – societal expectations – and those, to me, mean children first. Because like the old saying goes, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more