Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FRASER INSTITUTE -- Will Cutting Income Tax Rates Create Jobs for Canadians?

 

Job creation is often considered one of the most critical public-policy goals that governments seek to achieve.

 

 

The recent significant job losses that the country has experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic have brought employment to the forefront of meaningful policy discussions and, so, some commentators and analysts suggest that policy makers should embark on tax cuts to stimulate a higher employment rate in the economy. Nevertheless, the effects of tax policy on employment have been among the most contentious issues in academic and political circles.

 

There is also a lack of empirical evidence on this crucial issue in the Canadian setting, and results from previous studies are generally inconclusive. What are the effects of federal income taxes on employment? Can the Canadian federal government encourage private-sector job creation through cuts in the income-tax rate?

 

When governments face budgetary challenges and budget deficits rise, they often raise the income-tax rate on high-income earners and corporations to generate revenue. In Canada, since half of the capital gains are currently subject to income tax, any increase in the personal income-tax (PIT) rate also raises the tax burden on capital gains. However, various studies indicate that such attempts to raise tax revenue have high economic costs.

 

An increase in the top marginal statutory PIT rate can discourage entrepreneurship, which hurts private-sector’s capacity to create jobs in an economy. A higher income-tax rate reduces the after-tax wage income that individuals receive, and this adversely affects their incentives to work. Similarly, an increase in PIT that causes a rise in the capital gains taxes reduces the after-tax return for entrepreneurship and investment, ultimately hurting the economy’s capacity to create jobs.

 

The empirical analysis of this study shows that income taxes have significant adverse effects on private-sector employment.

 

The rates of the capital gains tax and the corporate income tax have similar negative effects on employment. The results of the study suggest that a one percentage-point cut in the federal top PIT rate leads to an increase in the private employment rate by about 0.25% in the year following the tax rate cut.

 

In other words, if the federal government cuts the top statutory marginal PIT rate from the current 33% to 29% — the rate prevailing before the 2016 tax-rate hike — the private sector will create about 110 thousand jobs in the year following the tax cut.

 

This would provide a vital boost to the economy that has suffered significant job losses as a result of the pandemic. Thus, this study’s important policy implication is that, if the Canadian federal government wishes to encourage private-sector job creation, cutting the top PIT rate (and the associated capital gains tax rate), is a crucial and promising policy choice to consider.

 

Such a policy change will also help significantly to improve Canada’s overall tax competitiveness in relation to other OECD countries.

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more