FELDSTED: If host nations are dumb enough to subsidize operations, helping improve the profit margin, don’t expect a ‘thank you’ or future loyalty
What makes Prime Minister Justin Trudeau believe he
can use tax dollars to bail out auto workers and not provide equal support to
other workers caught in downsizing, restructuring or bankruptcies? When did
equal rights become special rights?
More to the point, what is he doing to support
thousands of Alberta oil patch workers caught in maelstrom of his chaotic
energy and environmental policies? Why are they less deserving than Ontario
auto workers? Of all people, the unemployed in the oil industry deserve
consideration because they are victims of federal policies.
Actions have consequences, and his action have
created massive unemployment and disruption of families and lives. What is he
going to do about it?
MEANTIME… from CBC Canada:
… the provincial government can't
offer the company anything that would persuade it to keep the Oshawa
plant and its 2,500 good-paying jobs, GM Canada president Travis Hester told
the premier.
“'Is there anything we can do as a province,
absolutely anything?”, a downcast Ford told a news
conference Monday. "Asked him numerous times, and the answer was… “No,
there's nothing. Basically, the ship has already left the dock.”
No bail out, no special
tax concessions, no shared investment in new technology will keep the
automaker's plant open.
"It blows my mind" said
interim Liberal leader John Fraser. "It's a weak response, it's
unconscionable" … the previous
Liberal government (along with the federal Conservative government at the time)
invested "billions and billions of dollars to save hundreds of
thousands of jobs because we know how important the auto sector is to us."
This ‘analysis’,
is nothing more than leftist hand-wringing over policies that have failed in
the past. The analyst conveniently forgets that in 2008-09 the Conservative
government of the day was in a minority position and opposition parties were
screaming for an auto sector bailout to “save jobs”.
The current
government just wrote off the bailout loans to Daimler-Chrysler … now we have GM
chopping plants and jobs.
International
giants have no loyalty to the nations they operate in. They are in business to
make profits for shareholders. If host nations are dumb enough to subsidize
operations, helping improve the profit margin, don’t expect a ‘thank you’ or
future loyalty. However, building a
competitive, healthy, and reasonably regulated business environment will
attract business.
If a business
arrives offering to open, but demands tax breaks or other incentives to do
business, run from the proposition; it is only there until it finds a
competitor nation willing to improve on incentives.
We have no need to feed sharks when the sea is full of
dolphins who only want fair treatment.
The notion that
governments can cut deals with businessmen using taxpayer dollars as an
incentive has proven to be inane. The Bombardier ‘black hole’ is a good
example. Why does Standard Aero continue to grow and thrive without equivalent
hand-outs?
Political interference in business is killing us.
Air Canada
maintenance was moved from Winnipeg to Toronto for political purposes, not for
service or other problems. There was also the fighter aircraft maintenance
contract given to Quebec although Manitoba was low bidder.
The reason is that
Ontario has 121 seats -- or 36% -- and Quebec has 78 seats -- or 23% -- of seats in the House of Commons (HOC). The other
provinces have 140 seats -- or 41% -- of house seats, and are considered
politically expendable.
I am more and more
in favour of dividing Canada at the Manitoba / Ontario border, taking our 104
seats (31%) out of confederation and rebuilding the west. The alternative is to
restructure the Senate into its constitutional four sections; Ontario (24
seats), Quebec (24 seats), East (30 seats), and the West (24 seats) along with
the 3 seats in the Territories for a total of 27.
That would bring
governance balance back to the regions, and counter the imbalance in the House
of Commons … and that is precisely what the Senate was intended to do. A
politically neutral Senate is key to the survival of Canada. It is
legislatively possible and would require amendments to the Parliament of Canada
Act which is within the powers of Parliament.
A politically
structured Senate is not in the best interests of Canadians, as it simply
extends the political imbalance of the Commons to the Senate.
John Feldsted
Political Consultant
& Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Comments
Post a Comment