Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

LEONARD: Duty as Chair of the Saanich Police Board, and The Diary of Anne Frank


It is a given that the Mayor represents the community.   

To me this means the Mayor or Board Chair are in many ways an ambassador and this leads to many ribbon-cuttings and sod-turnings.  I also believe you have to take the good with the bad and that when something goes wrong, you have to step up and ‘take one for the team.’

When a road project went over budget or when a bridge took far too long to complete, I always felt I had to take responsibility and represent the municipality.  Perhaps not with too much enthusiasm, but I believed you can’t take credit when things go well but then point fingers when they don’t. 

In the case of the Admirals Road bridge that took months longer than originally announced to complete, I was steaming inside and let staff know that I was extremely upset that the contract allowed this but publicly I agreed to the interviews and provided factually updates.  Nonetheless, I had no interest in a ribbon-cutting and instructed staff to let traffic across the bridge the moment it was safe.  Not only had the delay been a tremendous inconvenience for thousands of residents, it had cost merchants thousands of dollars and I just couldn’t shrug that off.

Some of my more challenging times in representing ‘the team’ was while I was Chair of the Saanich Police Board.  It is one thing to take the good with the bad, but in policing the ‘bad’ can be very, very bad.  Police shootings, murder investigations and aggressive arrests can be the topics of briefings from your Police Chief.  In this case the Board Chair has a duty of oversight and confidentiality so public comments are limited if made at all although I rarely used the ‘no comment’ excuse.   

If something had happened on ‘my watch’ then I would at least explain why I shouldn’t comment, describe what role the Board and I may have in the future and refer media or sometimes a citizen to the appropriate source of information.


Early in my time as Police Board Chair, we had a columnist from Vancouver book one of our libraries for a meeting.  Unfortunately, this columnist had a reputation of being a holocaust denier.  Today I hope our hate speech laws allow for such rentals to be rejected but in the late 1990’s this didn’t seem to be the case – in fact, I didn’t know about the event until after the fact.

Predictably the event attracted protesters but our police presence was lacking and at the very least, there was some pushing and shoving as attendees entered the building.  The organizers retained a local lawyer who always seemed to represent people with such views and he made a good case that our police department had not properly prepared for the event.

So, what to do? 

The Police Chief had worked out a solution – all it would take to satisfy the organizers and have them withdraw their official police complaint was for them to meet with the Mayor and Police Board Chair and receive an apology.  This was not a solution that I would have chosen and I pushed back at first by suggesting they meet with him and get their apology – after all, this was an operational issue.  But they wanted the apology from ‘The Mayor’ and shutting down this formal complaint was valuable – certainly I didn’t want our organization to be distracted with a public hearing where they were in ‘the right’ and we were in ‘the wrong.’

A meeting was scheduled and I prepared.  I’m sort of a neat and tidy guy and my desk is always quite organized, at least what you see on top.  But for this meeting I cleared off my calendar, calculator, pens and tire shop memorabilia and had a totally clean, clear wooden desk – except for one thing.  I bought a paperback copy of the Diary of Anne Frank.  The lawyer and his client walked in, sat down, and I stated my brief three sentence apology.  I looked up with just my book between us and asked ‘is there anything else’ – they said ‘no’ and got up and left.

I fulfilled my duty to represent; and I still have that paperback to remind me how I did it.


Frank Leonard … was Mayor of Saanich and Chair of the Police Board from 1996-2014 after serving as a Councillor from 1986. While in public office, Frank chaired the Municipal Finance Authority of BC, was President of the Union of BC Municipalities and a Director of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities. He has also served as Chair of the Capital Regional District, the Hospital District and the region’s Housing Corporation.

With a unique blend of private and public sector experience, that is a unique resource for clients, Frank Leonard provides strategic advice for local governments, and about local governments.  Check out his website at http://frankleonard.ca/. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more