Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: When cities have trouble meeting their obligations they go to their provinces for help. Federal funding then mucks up the responsibility chain


Liberals detail homelessness program, set to unveil anti-poverty law -- Plan will set an official poverty line for Canada for the first time
The Canadian Press / CBC News  ~~  Nov 05, 2018

Cities looking for more federal cash and a more regular flow of money to tackle poverty are being told that they will be able to tap into $1.25 billion over the next nine years through the Liberal government's cornerstone homelessness strategy … revamped homelessness strategy, dubbed "Reaching Home," will come into force early next year, which is when cities will be able to apply for new funding.

Municipal governments administer most of Canada's housing programs but construction and rent subsidies are expensive so the cities rely on provincial and federal governments to support them …

CLICK HERE for the full story


PLEASE STOP …
… building more bureaucracies
… subsidizing cities
… pretending you can deal with poverty and homelessness
… building future ghettos

Cities are created by, and are the responsibility of, provinces. They are not a ‘third level’ of government. They are the first level of government, closest to the people they serve and most responsible to the people they serve.

When cities have trouble meeting their obligations, they go to their provinces for help. Federal funding then mucks up the responsibility chain, and encourages irresponsible spending.


Raise the personal income tax exception, and insist the provinces do the same. Allow the poor and working poor to keep their earnings tax free.

Stop building house and apartment complexes for the poor and homeless. Non-government agencies, who are helping the homeless, need provincial subsidies, not more bureaucrats.

Establish rental rate averages for apartments and homes, and then subsidize those who can’t afford 80% of the average rental cost for a like apartment or house. It’s a lot cheaper than building housing and apartments that turn into slums that harbour criminals.

Stop stigmatizing people who are down and out. They need counseling to regain a sense of self-worth that has been trashed for a variety of reasons.

Raise the personal income tax exception, and insist the provinces do the same. Allow the poor and working poor to keep their earnings tax free.

And finally?  Invest in addictions counseling and treatment.

Canada-wide, our efforts to treat addictions are dismally and woefully inadequate, tying up justice, police and medical services needlessly. The combination of addiction and poverty is horrendously expensive and a root cause of property crime. Desperate people turn to desperate measures.


John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more