Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

BESLER: You didn’t say how Harper defends globalism, you hint that he brings it together with populism. How does he accomplish this?


I just finished reading Stephen Harper’s, new book, “Right Here, Right Now”.  I was interested to see how Harper would bring together his populist views, with his advocacy of globalism.

On that topic, he stated that, “The right conservative path is not to bemoan today’s populism, it is to listen to it and learn from it.” He suggests that not doing so will lead to a destructive left-wing populism of which society may never recover.

I am paraphrasing here however, I believe former Prime Minister Stephen Harper is essentially saying:

  1. Andrew Scheer messed up, should have kept Maxime Bernier in the party 
  2. People are rejecting Trudeau’s “post nationalism” 
  3. They won’t return to the Scheer style Conservative elitism they also recently rejected 
  4. They will support Maxime Bernier, and values-based populist conservative ideas 
  5. If the conservative base won’t unite around values-based populist conservatism, then perhaps someone like Alberta’s Rachael Notley or BC’s Andrew Weaver could be next in line for high office. God help us then.
In talking about the book, with political friends, I was asked, “You didn't say how Harper defends globalism, you hint that he brings it together with populism.  How?”.




That is a good question, which I too was curious about.  How does he justify what, at this time, seems to be two contradictory positions?

Personally, I don’t think he was actually able to defend globalism very well, although it seems as he hopes for it to galvanize. He seems to lay responsibility at the feet of the “anywhere’s*”, to better understand what he believes is their responsibility to the “somewhere’s**”.  As to who these anywhere’s, and somewhere’s? … see below for my thoughts on that.  

Meantime, I wasn’t getting off easy, as this observation pointed out to me:

“Harper is an elitist. His screed is about how the globalists - the Anywheres - can manipulate the yokels using the existing political structures. It is a failing approach from a failed politician.”

My thought?  I’ll just say, ‘Quite possibly’, as it is in part an admittance of those failures. 

Regardless of all that, Stephen Harper’s, new book, “Right Here, Right Now” is a thoughtful read. Although I don’t agree with every position. I do recommend the book. 


BEN BESLER ... has been active in provincial politics for many years. Former Vice President of the BC Conservative Party and Regional Organizer for the successful Fight HST citizens initiative. He offers a often colourful perspective to conservative thought. 


*“Anywhere’s” are people that live anywhere, and therefore don’t see themselves attached to a nation state. “They are globally oriented in their careers and personal lives”.  

**“Somewhere’s” on the other hand are those whose “social life is connected to a church, service club, restaurant-bar, sports team, or community group. You only leave your region for brief vacations. Your values can broadly be described as localist”.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more