Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

BESLER: You didn’t say how Harper defends globalism, you hint that he brings it together with populism. How does he accomplish this?


I just finished reading Stephen Harper’s, new book, “Right Here, Right Now”.  I was interested to see how Harper would bring together his populist views, with his advocacy of globalism.

On that topic, he stated that, “The right conservative path is not to bemoan today’s populism, it is to listen to it and learn from it.” He suggests that not doing so will lead to a destructive left-wing populism of which society may never recover.

I am paraphrasing here however, I believe former Prime Minister Stephen Harper is essentially saying:

  1. Andrew Scheer messed up, should have kept Maxime Bernier in the party 
  2. People are rejecting Trudeau’s “post nationalism” 
  3. They won’t return to the Scheer style Conservative elitism they also recently rejected 
  4. They will support Maxime Bernier, and values-based populist conservative ideas 
  5. If the conservative base won’t unite around values-based populist conservatism, then perhaps someone like Alberta’s Rachael Notley or BC’s Andrew Weaver could be next in line for high office. God help us then.
In talking about the book, with political friends, I was asked, “You didn't say how Harper defends globalism, you hint that he brings it together with populism.  How?”.




That is a good question, which I too was curious about.  How does he justify what, at this time, seems to be two contradictory positions?

Personally, I don’t think he was actually able to defend globalism very well, although it seems as he hopes for it to galvanize. He seems to lay responsibility at the feet of the “anywhere’s*”, to better understand what he believes is their responsibility to the “somewhere’s**”.  As to who these anywhere’s, and somewhere’s? … see below for my thoughts on that.  

Meantime, I wasn’t getting off easy, as this observation pointed out to me:

“Harper is an elitist. His screed is about how the globalists - the Anywheres - can manipulate the yokels using the existing political structures. It is a failing approach from a failed politician.”

My thought?  I’ll just say, ‘Quite possibly’, as it is in part an admittance of those failures. 

Regardless of all that, Stephen Harper’s, new book, “Right Here, Right Now” is a thoughtful read. Although I don’t agree with every position. I do recommend the book. 


BEN BESLER ... has been active in provincial politics for many years. Former Vice President of the BC Conservative Party and Regional Organizer for the successful Fight HST citizens initiative. He offers a often colourful perspective to conservative thought. 


*“Anywhere’s” are people that live anywhere, and therefore don’t see themselves attached to a nation state. “They are globally oriented in their careers and personal lives”.  

**“Somewhere’s” on the other hand are those whose “social life is connected to a church, service club, restaurant-bar, sports team, or community group. You only leave your region for brief vacations. Your values can broadly be described as localist”.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...
Post a Comment
Read more

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more