Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: MPs who analyze the legislation they are dealing with, and propose amendments, are ostracised as not being ‘team players’


Canadian Politics Has Entered Era Of 'Extreme Partisanship': Samara Report
By Zi-Ann Lum  ~~  Huffington Post  ~~  0/31/2018

OTTAWA — Politics is ingrained in an era of "extreme partisanship" and unless parliamentarians tone down "anti-democratic" rivalries, public confidence in federal parties will deteriorate, warns a new report by the Samara Centre for Democracy.

The Toronto-based non-partisan charity published a report Wednesday titled "The Real House Lives," encouraging parties adopt changes to limit the influence party leaders have over caucus members. The Samara Centre interviewed 54 former MPs from the last Parliament who were swept from office after the Liberals won a majority mandate in 2015.

Jane Hilderman, the organization's executive editor, said it was surprising to hear MPs say they saw partisanship intensify in the last Parliament. She said several MPs claimed the relationship between MP and party leader had grown even more unequal in caucus.

For the full story, CLICK HERE

My Opinion?   

The Samara Report is a couple of decades late. Elections were once run on the ground in electoral districts (ridings), but TV and the Internet have changed that dramatically. We are flooded by political party advertising dominated by highlighting the party leader.

In five decades of participating in federal elections, I have never seen nasty partisan politics equal to the 2015 campaign -- it reminded me of the lyrics from a Johnny Cash song, “A Boy Named Sue”:

Well I hit him hard right between the eyes
And he went down but to my surprise
He came up with a knife and cut off a piece of my ear
But I busted a chair right across his teeth
And we crashed through the wall and into the street
Kicking and a’ gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer
I tell ya, I’ve fought tougher men, but I really can’t remember when
He kicked like a mule and bit like a crocodile....

Partisan politics cause us to lose all sense of reality, and it gives us no chance to compare the positions of political parties on key issues that matter to us.

We need to know what each party’s governance plans are – budgets, deficits, public safety, taxation, immigration, health care, support for seniors and low-income people, reductions in bureaucracy and regulations, development of our resources and other things that matter most to Canadians.


Partisan politics allow political parties to avoid the nitty gritty, and then later claim they have ‘a mandate to govern’ when they don’t.

The party that wins the most seats forms a Cabinet to run government.

But, does that Cabinet make governance decisions, in consultation with all elected party MPs?  NO, it does not!  What we get instead is the party leader, now Prime Minister, together with party officials and select unelected advisors dictating to Cabinet what they want.  Then, that Cabinet shames the rest into obedience.

How is that democratically representing the electorate and society?

Partisan bickering continues in sittings of the House of Commons, making the work of committees (where the real work of parliament is done) more difficult. Those Committees are certainly not efficient, or effective.  Instead, politicians and staffers, at the Committee level are too busy gaining an edge on the ‘other guys’.

Rivalry between the MPs for appointments and positions is as old as parliament, and it is intensified by their mistreatment by party bosses.  But ... they did not run for office, and win their seat, to be marginalized when they arrive in Ottawa.

Run the numbers:

There are 338 seats in the House of Commons (HOC). A political party has win at least 170 seats to form a majority government, and needs 180 seats for a comfortable majority. The governing liberals have 182 seats. Only 35 are members of cabinet (including the Prime Minister). Another 37 are named parliamentary secretaries. The secretaries are subservient to the Ministers. The remaining 110 Liberal MPs sit on one or more committees, but their participation is managed by party staffers and Ministers.

Independent opinion and thinking are frowned on … and MPs who analyze the legislation they are dealing with, and propose amendments, are ostracised as not being ‘team players’. 

The numbers for opposition parties are smaller, but follow the same pattern. It is fair to surmise that at least 200 elected MPs have little voice in the parties they represent and none in governance decisions. That is appalling and unacceptable.

After each election a Prime Minister chooses a cabinet. Pundits and the media speculate on who will represent the cabinet from each province, and whether enough women will be included.

Why not pick the best person for the job?

The cabinet exists to serve all Canadians, not regions or provinces. Why have we been sidetracked into appeasing regions rather than seeking effective governance?  After all, the Senate is formed along regional lines, and that is where and how regions are protected.

Our Parliament has deteriorated into an oligarchy, with nearly 60% of elected members having no voice in proceedings. Democracy has been stolen from us, and sadly, many of those who demand a change to elections, to ‘fix’ parliament, have no idea how the institution operates.

The problem is abuse of power by unelected political party officials, not how we elect representatives. Proportional representation will only make matters far worse.

The solution is simple; get rid of the fog, smog, smoke and mirrors -- ban all political party election advertising except at electoral district level, where we vote for our representatives.

Political parties use huge sums of your donations to hire advertising agencies and pollsters, so they can appeal to feelings, and fuel indignation and outrage, rather than setting out their plans for governance. We are voting based on slick advertising and social media gossip rather than vital information on governance plans. Trolls on social media influence our elections because we too readily accept rumours as fact.

Political parties moan about low voter turnouts, but they are the problem. An increasing number of electors are done with electing a representative who winds up marginalized despite sound thinking ability, common sense and substantial abilities. We are stifling hundreds of years of experience, and ability, that can only lead us to better governance.

The few dozen political party officials, who have clawed their way into position of power within political parties, have gained power over governments and our elected representatives.

Shame on us for allowing it.


John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH: Without a strong local presence, there is NO reason for anyone to tune in to local(?) radio

LOCAL HOMETOWN RADIO IS DYING … and without serious measures put in place, it will likely never see the light of day again. For well over four decades, the Canadian Radio and Television Commission (CRTC) has presided over its’ demise, and for that I say, “Shame”. Without out a word to say enough was enough, the CRTC has allowed corporate Canada to buy up one radio station after the other, and then allowed them to slash staff to the point where some so-called local radio stations do nothing more than air programming that originates from communities well outside the region in which they are located. Case in point?   On CHNL* 610 in Kamloops, the morning show hosted by Vinnie and Randi, DOES NOT originate from Kamloops -- it doesn’t even originate here in BC. It’s a program that Stingray airs across multiple radio stations in Western Canada. It doesn’t end there. Not only are Vinnie and Rando doing mornings on CHNL, but they also show up on sister station Country 103 … and of course o...

Conservative Economic Team Responds to Urgent Industry Concerns

 " For far too long, the BC NDP has ignored the economic challenges facing British Columbians. Manufacturing jobs are vanishing, forestry is in decline, and private sector employment growth has stagnated. Meanwhile, affordability has worsened for both families and businesses. British Columbians deserve better, and we’re here to deliver real solutions to rebuild our economy and create jobs that support everyday working people and their families ." – Gavin Dew, MLA and Shadow Minister for Jobs, Economy, Development, and Innovation.   December 3, 2024, Vancouver, BC – The Conservative economic team met today with business leaders and stakeholders to tackle critical issues impacting British Columbia’s economy. Attended by 9 critics from the Conservative Caucus, this meeting was convened by MLA Gavin Dew – Shadow Minister for Jobs, Economic Development, and Innovation - as a direct response to an October 30th open letter from seven of the province’s largest industry associations. ...

WARD STAMER -- We need certainly in our markets, and certainly in our fibre supply, before we no longer have a forest industry in this province

Image Government of BC I think we all realize that the threat of Trump’s 25% tariff is like other provocative statements he’s made in the past. That said, we should have reason to be concerned. Tariffs don’t benefit anyone. A tariff of that magnitude – included on our own softwood lumber exports, will make things more expensive for Americans, and cause friction in the supply chain. If imposed, a twenty-five percent tariff will be equally detrimental to the citizens and economy of the United States, as well as the people of BC. There are two things, however, of equal concern to the threat of punitive tariffs by incoming U.S. President-elect Donald Trump. One is our antiquated stumpage fees. It is a legacy from decades ago, and one incapable of responding to changing market conditions. We need to revamp our stumpage system to better reflect market conditions, and our economic costs. Instead, a value-added tax system will be instantly responsive to current market conditions and will encou...

Labels

Show more