Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

IF media is going to survive as a true Fourth Estate or Fourth Power, then it MUST remain free of political interference


Yesterday I received two emails, and coincidentally they were both on the same topic.... the News Media.

The first was from Leah who said to me … PLEASE DO A BLOG ON THIS!!!


By the way, that was her HUGE BOLD FONT not mind – I just copied and pasted to show her emphasis.  The request was in reference to a story “Justin Trudeau Buying the Media in time for 2019 Election”

Then there was the second email.  It came from Conservative Party of Canada Ontario MP Peter Kent who stated:

I would like to apologize sincerely for suggesting yesterday that – based on government messaging – the Liberals were going to offer legacy media organizations a $50 million bailout package in an election year.  I was wrong – they are actually giving them a $595 million bailout package.

It is highly unlikely Peter Kent is going to read this piece, but Leah likely will.  Likely because my response to her yesterday was to say,

“So much has been written on this; and I agree that at the very least there us ab impression of the media being bought off.  I don't know what more I might add?”

I have changed my mind because there is something I believe can be said, which is different to what has already been stated.

There are now very few areas of life that the government has not intruded – that, to the point where there is so much reliance on government, nothing that might question the motives of what they do, can safely be questioned.


Years ago, government carved off many areas in social services that they dealt with.  For example … direct services to the vulnerable … mental health services … youth services … those dealing with the homeless … substance abuse problems … life skills programs … new immigrants … community groups and clubs.  On and on the list goes.

The societies, and agencies, that deal with these and many other important support services in our communities do valuable work … but they are all vulnerable to the whims of government.  In fact, their very continued existence is dependent on continuing to receiving funding for the services they provide … each and every year.

I know from personal experience in writing this blog, that questions many times go unanswered --- they do for one reason, and one reason only.  A fear of losing funding should the very government agencies I, and others, ask questions about, decide they don’t like what they hear.

Is that a real fear, or a perceived fear?  Honestly, in my opinion it does not matter.  The fear alone is enough to make many with stories to tell, and issues that need being uncovered, clam up.

That brings me back around to Leah’s email to … PLEASE DO A BLOG ON THIS!!!

IF government does end up providing funding to the very media outlets that report on them, the same real – or perceived – fears will surface there as well.  After all, what Editor or Publisher is going to risk have a reporter or Op / Ed commentator say something that ruffles the feathers of government.  As the old saying, “Don’t bite the hand that feeds you” certainly comes to mind.

IF, media is going to survive as a true Fourth Estate (or Fourth Power), then it MUST remain free of political interference.  The ability to truly advocate for those who need advocacy … to frame political issues in ways that may not being pleasing to government … or to try and shape, questions, and influence you and I in a way that is contrary to where government want us to think and look … will otherwise be forever lost.

Throughout history time has continued to march on, and the ways in which we do things have changed.  That is certainly happening right now in the news media industry.

It is up to the news media industry to figure out how to make themselves relevant again, in a way they can continue to be viable.  That way however, must not, and cannot, depend on a financial bailout from government.

I’m Alan Forseth in Kamloops.  If you have any thoughts on this commentary, please share them below in the Comments Section. 
Labels:

Comments

  1. Laila YuileNovember 23, 2018 at 12:03 PM

    Good post but bigger picture is missing.

    Under the Harper era, there was just as much political interference as under Trudeau. It came in the form we have here in BC under BC Libs- personal friendships and government ad buys. I actually quit 24 Hrs in part because

    1) Postmedia bought us and immediately started cutting our small but formidable newsroom. Before I left we had been the second most read print publication in Western Canada, behind the Province and ahead of The Vancouver Sun in rankings (which is probably why they bought us...)
    2) And 2) because Postmedia editors had pulled a column that mocked Harpers attacks on Trudeaus hair, when he had his own hairdresser. They said it didn't align with their values… but it was clearly political interference imo.

    That was the last straw for me. I told my editor and she asked me to reconsider, but I didn't want to be a part of that company and their style of death by a thousand cuts journalism... I said no. Ironically, they laid off my editor right after that, justifying the exact reason I quit.

    Even now under the NDP, we have seen reporters and columnists having a beer or playing pool or whatever with Horgan. One might say its building rapport. Someone else might say there is a professional line that must be maintained when it's a given you will be reporting on the person you are sharing a beer with.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more