IF media is going to survive as a true Fourth Estate or Fourth Power, then it MUST remain free of political interference
Yesterday
I received two emails, and coincidentally they were both on the same topic.... the News Media.
The first was from Leah who said to me … PLEASE DO A BLOG ON THIS!!!
By the way, that was her HUGE BOLD FONT not mind – I just copied and pasted to show her emphasis. The request was in reference to a story “Justin Trudeau Buying the Media in time for 2019 Election”
Then there was the second email. It came from Conservative Party of Canada
Ontario MP Peter Kent who stated:
I would like to
apologize sincerely for suggesting
yesterday that – based on government messaging – the Liberals were going to
offer legacy media organizations a $50 million bailout package in an election
year. I was wrong – they are actually giving them a $595 million bailout package.
It is
highly unlikely Peter Kent is going to read this piece, but Leah likely will. Likely because my response to her yesterday
was to say,
“So much has been written on this; and I agree that at
the very least there us ab impression of the media being bought off. I
don't know what more I might add?”
I have changed
my mind because there is something I believe can be said, which is different to
what has already been stated.
There
are now very few areas of life that the government has not intruded – that, to the
point where there is so much reliance on government, nothing that might
question the motives of what they do, can safely be questioned.
Years
ago, government carved off many areas in social services that they dealt
with. For example … direct services to
the vulnerable … mental health services … youth services … those dealing with
the homeless … substance abuse problems … life skills programs … new immigrants
… community groups and clubs. On and on
the list goes.
The societies, and agencies, that deal with these and many other important support services in our communities do valuable work … but they are all vulnerable to the whims of government. In fact, their very continued existence is dependent on continuing to receiving funding for the services they provide … each and every year.
The societies, and agencies, that deal with these and many other important support services in our communities do valuable work … but they are all vulnerable to the whims of government. In fact, their very continued existence is dependent on continuing to receiving funding for the services they provide … each and every year.
I know
from personal experience in writing this blog, that questions many times go
unanswered --- they do for one reason, and one reason only. A fear of losing funding should the very
government agencies I, and others, ask questions about, decide they don’t like what
they hear.
Is that
a real fear, or a perceived fear? Honestly,
in my opinion it does not matter. The
fear alone is enough to make many with stories to tell, and issues that need
being uncovered, clam up.
That brings me back around to Leah’s email to … PLEASE DO A BLOG ON THIS!!!
IF government does end up providing funding to the very media outlets that
report on them, the same real – or perceived – fears will surface there as
well. After all, what Editor or Publisher
is going to risk have a reporter or Op / Ed commentator say something that
ruffles the feathers of government. As the
old saying, “Don’t bite the hand that feeds you” certainly comes to mind.
IF,
media is going to survive as a true Fourth Estate (or Fourth Power), then it
MUST remain free of political interference.
The ability to truly advocate for those who need advocacy … to frame
political issues in ways that may not being pleasing to government … or to try
and shape, questions, and influence you and I in a way that is contrary to
where government want us to think and look … will otherwise be forever lost.
Throughout
history time has continued to march on, and the ways in which we do things have
changed. That is certainly happening
right now in the news media industry.
It is
up to the news media industry to figure out how to make themselves relevant again,
in a way they can continue to be viable.
That way however, must not, and cannot, depend on a financial bailout
from government.
I’m
Alan Forseth in Kamloops. If you have any thoughts on this commentary,
please share them below in the Comments Section.
Good post but bigger picture is missing.
ReplyDeleteUnder the Harper era, there was just as much political interference as under Trudeau. It came in the form we have here in BC under BC Libs- personal friendships and government ad buys. I actually quit 24 Hrs in part because
1) Postmedia bought us and immediately started cutting our small but formidable newsroom. Before I left we had been the second most read print publication in Western Canada, behind the Province and ahead of The Vancouver Sun in rankings (which is probably why they bought us...)
2) And 2) because Postmedia editors had pulled a column that mocked Harpers attacks on Trudeaus hair, when he had his own hairdresser. They said it didn't align with their values… but it was clearly political interference imo.
That was the last straw for me. I told my editor and she asked me to reconsider, but I didn't want to be a part of that company and their style of death by a thousand cuts journalism... I said no. Ironically, they laid off my editor right after that, justifying the exact reason I quit.
Even now under the NDP, we have seen reporters and columnists having a beer or playing pool or whatever with Horgan. One might say its building rapport. Someone else might say there is a professional line that must be maintained when it's a given you will be reporting on the person you are sharing a beer with.