Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FORSETH: I’m an old curmudgeon of 63, complaining about the good ol’ days. Guess what? In terms of radio at least, I think they were!


Earlier this morning on the blog, I posted an op / ed piece from John Feldsted entitled, We have lost the diversity of media opinion through consolidation, and the concentration of media reporters, to a few multiple media outlets

It got me thinking …

Me in the studios of CKWL in Williams Lake (early 70s)
As someone who began a 25+ year career in radio, beginning at the age of 15 working part-time while still in High School, I can personally attest to what a dismal failure the buying up of media has been – at least in the case of radio.

In EVERY instance of a larger company, buying up a smaller local community station, staff were let go, automation increased, and news became more and more a centralized creation – eliminating or reducing differences of opinion and thought.

I know from personal experience that you can tell when a station is automated --- all you have to do is listen for time checks (you don’t hear them when automated) ... the weather (no local temps during automation) ... immediate current events (they're non-existent).

Up until a couple decades ago, local stations welcomed young people off the street, and they could learn and get hands-on experience in radio.  Most stations ran 24 hours a day … seven days a week, although some did automate, or get an overnight feed to run between 12 midnight and 6am.  Even in a small community, it took at least a dozen people to run a radio station.

Now-a-days however?   

That smaller community station is part of a multi-station network, and with any kind of luck, it will still have one person in the newsroom covering a bare minimum of local news (because that’s all they have time for), a couple of on-air announcers, and maybe one or two other staff members.

Writing and production of advertising will be done in a larger centre, mid-day and early afternoon … evening … and overnight shifts will all come from a larger centre with no idea what is going on at the local level.

Local opinion … ideas … community information??  They pretty much cease to exist, or are wound down to a bare minimum to meet the requirements of the CRTC (Canadian Radio and Television Commission).

I have seen it happen in the Cariboo with the three communities of Williams Lake, Quesnel, and 100 Mile House (with the Cariboo Radio Network) – I also saw it in the Cariboo when an independent station (CFFM) started up and then also was bought up by the same network that owned Cariboo Radio.  They were bought up over and over again – each time by a larger company – and each time with more stiff reductions.

I now live in Kamloops, and I can assure you the same thing has happened here … the latest being CHNL and its sister stations.  From local ownership – to ownership by a 100+ station conglomerate called New Cap Radio out of Newfoundland … and now to Stingray Radio; another conglomerate with 100+ station, online digital radio, TV stations including music video, and more … all across 7 provinces.

Those changes have created more automation, and more newscast aired from The Canadian Press.  That sucks!  It takes away from community involvement … and it reduces local content and information.

It’s the curse of today's world where things get bigger and bigger, in terms of company size and penetration of the marketplace.  At the local level however?  Things get smaller and smaller … and they certainly ARE NOT better.

Oh, and by the way … you’re right.  I’m an old curmudgeon of 63, complaining about the good ol’ days.  Guess what?  In terms of radio at least, I think they were!

Comments

  1. I totally agree, Alan. At one time, radio was an integral part of everyone's life. A part of the daily routine. An access to the world, but more importantly, an access to, and a refection of, our own communities. From the time we woke up on the morning to the drive home from work radio was with us. And the more people could hear their friends and neighbors on air, the more they listened. That's largely been lost as the large networks that bought up these stations has left so few employees that news coverage and community involvement has suffered dramatically. This is no apparent than on election nights. The coverage back in the day was extensive and professional. Sadly, the cutting of staff after network take overs was the only negative effect. In order to maintain their pablum-like, homogenized, sanitized, unified network sound they forbid announcers from showing any individual creativity or personality, two cornerstones in broadcasting. Radio stopped being fun and atopped being relevant. After 25 years in broadcasting I leftban industry that had been gutted of character and stripped of it's reason for being. I am glad however that I got to sprnd a lot of my career as your partner in crime. We had fun, my friend. We had fun.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And fun it certainly was ...or maybe enjoyable would be a better descriptive. We were plugged in to our community, and we were accountable to it. So sad that has been lost. :(

      Delete
    2. Good comments well expressed guys. It’s really sad to see what’s happened to an industry that was so vital, exciting and close to the audiences. I really feel for so many of the talented broadcasters, many of them here in Kamloops who are not able to use their gifts and still be doing what they love. There was a wealth of great talent in this market for a long time. Of the many things I’m thankful for, being able to still be in the business, on the air, writing hosting producing and marketing my own show is near the top.
      I was entertaining folks at the 100 Mile Historical society’s anniversary celebration last summer, and a lot of folks were asking why The SPIRIT OF THE WEST was no longer carried on the Cariboo Radio network, and that was news to me. It started there in 1994. I guess it was another decision made at the corporate headquarters, thinking they knew more about the local market than the folks who live and work there.
      I’ve got storehouse of memories that I love to re visit. One of them was being in a real head to head ratings war with CJCI in Prince George. Dave’s brother Don and I battled it out from 6:00 to 9:00 every morning and he was a formidable competitor. The great thing about that was how we would work together on various community events, projects and fund raisers. We had respect for each other and were good friends.
      B.C.’s present minister of public safety was my morning news guy back then. We did all our show prep long before social media, or Wi-Fi. The first 3 stations I worked at didn’t even have cart machines.
      There are still a handful of places where it’s about air personalities and community involvement. I just hope they can hang on and maybe reverse the trend.

      Delete
  2. Hey my lil’ radio buddy,

    at least we got to be part of the “golden age” When this jockeys actually spun records.

    These conglomerates that I bought up local radio stations and turn them into repeaters don’t see that they’re contributing to their own demise.

    If you sound the same as every other source of music but Have nothing else to offer why? If all you’re gonna be as a jukebox, Consumerscan get far better quality, listening to a CD, MP3’s, or online sources like Spotify. I tried to explain all this to our beloved station managers, but they were more interested in cutting costs. Short term thinking Has destroyed local radio. I don’t even bother listening to local radio anymore which is a bit sad

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more