Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Alberta needs help. The world has to turn away from fossil fuel expansion, not from Albertans


USED WITH PERMISSION -- The following letter was recently sent by Peter Ladner to Rick Peterson of Suits and Boots. Peter Ladner is a retired entrepreneur, journalist, politician, author and grandfather.

 
Peter Ladner: Retired entrepreneur, journalist, author & grandfather
Thanks for hosting and organizing the Suits and Boots “Face-to-Face Resource Sector Tour” event (held) in Vancouver. It is so good to get those with opposing views in the same room, instead of fanning the flames in our protected echo chambers.

I wish I had added two things when you gave me the opportunity to talk.

The first is can we just shut up about the foreign-funded radical conspiracy, and shut down the war room that ennobles it? It has been thoroughly debunked by Sandy Garossino and Markham Hislop — not because Vivian Krause’s facts are wrong, but because they are carefully selected to weave a fraudulent narrative that elevates her by demonizing organizations like the David Suzuki Foundation, where I sit on the board.

Imagine your own organization, made up of decent people doing their best to make the world a better place as they see it, being publicly attacked by a taxpayer-funded government initiative aimed at shutting it down based on false information.

The foreign-funded radicals’ narrative deviously leads people to satisfying but unwarranted hatred and anger that diverts them from the hard work of managing the inevitable energy transition. As I’m sure you know by now, the Tar Sands campaign has wound down, it was never the cause of Alberta’s economic woes, it was always overwhelmingly funded and led by Canadians, and its American funders spent far more money opposing US and international fossil fuel expansion than they did in Canada.


The second point is that from the viewpoint of the David Suzuki Foundation (where we got 5% of our funding from US sources last year BTW), ENGOs/Greens are not driven in any way by bad feelings towards Albertans, especially those whose lives have been upended by the current economic downturn in that province. Providing a compassionate transition for workers upended by fossil fuel reductions is job #1.

We are driven by a passion similar to that of your members, only we are more focused on climate change as the looming destroyer of the economy and quality of life of everyone on the planet. As your young member said at the lunch, young people are so distressed by this reality they are committing suicide and suffering unprecedented levels of mass depression. Unfortunately, science tells us that fossil fuel expansion has to stop if we are going to even pretend to meet Paris targets.

I think the elephant in the room is that from the point of view of someone desperate to keep the oil flowing, climate change is denied or pushed aside. I can’t count the number of articles and interviews and posts I have read that purport to get to the bottom of Alberta’s problems without ever mentioning the phrase “climate change”. As though it doesn’t exist.

I think I know why.

I won’t deal with the deniers. But in my sincere efforts to understand Alberta’s point of view (I still haven’t blocked Brett Wilson from my Twitter feed!) the strongest argument I’ve heard for ignoring climate change is that Canada only produces 2% of world GHG emissions so why should we suffer when China, India, the US and other countries aren’t doing their bit? This is a strong argument, even without accounting for the massive GHG-reduction initiatives underway in those countries.

And yet it makes me think of our response to the glut of plastic and microplastics piling up in the world, killing fish, birds, and entering all our bloodstreams and food. We all want it to stop. But why should I reduce my plastic use when it won’t make any difference in the bigger picture? In my mind, I have no choice. I just can’t throw plastic into the ocean and think it’s OK. For the same reason, I don’t litter. For the same reason, I’m dug in on reducing GHG emissions.

If climate change is bringing catastrophic harm to billions of people in the world, I have no choice but to do everything I can to reduce that harm. We cannot ask or expect China, India, the US or any other country to act if Canada doesn’t do its part. We’re high per capita emission producers, we’ve off-loaded many of our emissions to countries like China that produce all our stuff, and we’re more able to adapt compared to less developed countries. We cannot reach our Paris targets without curtailing future oil production.

So, yeah, it’s easy for me to say this because I’m well-off, retired, happily hypocritical about flying on holidays and driving my car, and not going to suffer personally from limits to fossil fuel expansion in Canada. I realize that colours my views, but it doesn’t make me unsympathetic to Alberta’s plight, and it doesn’t mean Alberta can tune out climate change.

Alberta needs help. The world has to turn away from fossil fuel expansion, not from Albertans. 

Many of us are eager to help speed the energy transition in Alberta and across the country in the most prosperous and least harmful way possible. I used to be chair of The Natural Step Canada, which organizes the Energy Futures Lab in Alberta, funded in part by Suncor, to do just that.

Having a more honest and understanding discussion of these new realities is an essential requirement for this transition.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...

Labels

Show more