USED WITH PERMISSION -- The following letter was
recently sent by Peter Ladner to Rick Peterson of Suits and Boots. Peter Ladner is a retired
entrepreneur, journalist, politician, author and grandfather.
Thanks for hosting and organizing the Suits and Boots “Face-to-Face
Resource Sector Tour” event (held) in Vancouver. It is so good to get those
with opposing views in the same room, instead of fanning the flames in our
protected echo chambers.
I wish I had added two things when you gave
me the opportunity to talk.
The first is can we just shut up about the
foreign-funded radical conspiracy, and shut down the war room that ennobles it?
It has been thoroughly debunked by Sandy Garossino and Markham Hislop — not
because Vivian Krause’s facts are wrong, but because they are carefully
selected to weave a fraudulent narrative that elevates her by demonizing
organizations like the David Suzuki Foundation, where I sit on the board.
Imagine your own organization, made up of
decent people doing their best to make the world a better place as they see it,
being publicly attacked by a taxpayer-funded government initiative aimed at
shutting it down based on false information.
The foreign-funded radicals’ narrative
deviously leads people to satisfying but unwarranted hatred and anger that
diverts them from the hard work of managing the inevitable energy transition.
As I’m sure you know by now, the Tar Sands campaign has wound down, it was
never the cause of Alberta’s economic woes, it was always overwhelmingly funded
and led by Canadians, and its American funders spent far more money opposing US
and international fossil fuel expansion than they did in Canada.
The second point is that from the viewpoint
of the David Suzuki Foundation (where we got 5% of our funding from US sources
last year BTW), ENGOs/Greens are not driven in any way by bad feelings towards
Albertans, especially those whose lives have been upended by the current
economic downturn in that province. Providing a compassionate transition for
workers upended by fossil fuel reductions is job #1.
We are driven by a passion similar to that of
your members, only we are more focused on climate change as the looming destroyer
of the economy and quality of life of everyone on the planet. As your young
member said at the lunch, young people are so distressed by this reality they are
committing suicide and suffering unprecedented levels of mass depression.
Unfortunately, science tells us that fossil fuel expansion has to stop if we
are going to even pretend to meet Paris targets.
I think the elephant in the room is that from
the point of view of someone desperate to keep the oil flowing, climate change
is denied or pushed aside. I can’t count the number of articles and interviews
and posts I have read that purport to get to the bottom of Alberta’s problems
without ever mentioning the phrase “climate change”. As though it doesn’t
exist.
I think I know why.
I won’t deal with the deniers. But in my
sincere efforts to understand Alberta’s point of view (I still haven’t blocked
Brett Wilson from my Twitter feed!) the strongest argument I’ve heard for
ignoring climate change is that Canada only produces 2% of world GHG emissions
so why should we suffer when China, India, the US and other countries aren’t
doing their bit? This is a strong argument, even without accounting for the
massive GHG-reduction initiatives underway in those countries.
And yet it makes me think of our response to
the glut of plastic and microplastics piling up in the world, killing fish,
birds, and entering all our bloodstreams and food. We all want it to stop. But
why should I reduce my plastic use when it won’t make any difference in the
bigger picture? In my mind, I have no choice. I just can’t throw plastic into
the ocean and think it’s OK. For the same reason, I don’t litter. For the same
reason, I’m dug in on reducing GHG emissions.
If climate change is bringing catastrophic
harm to billions of people in the world, I have no choice but to do everything
I can to reduce that harm. We cannot ask or expect China, India, the US or any
other country to act if Canada doesn’t do its part. We’re high per capita
emission producers, we’ve off-loaded many of our emissions to countries like
China that produce all our stuff, and we’re more able to adapt compared to less
developed countries. We cannot reach our Paris targets without curtailing
future oil production.
So, yeah, it’s easy for me to say this
because I’m well-off, retired, happily hypocritical about flying on holidays
and driving my car, and not going to suffer personally from limits to fossil
fuel expansion in Canada. I realize that colours my views, but it doesn’t make
me unsympathetic to Alberta’s plight, and it doesn’t mean Alberta can tune out
climate change.
Alberta needs help. The world has to turn
away from fossil fuel expansion, not from Albertans.
Many of us are eager to help speed the energy
transition in Alberta and across the country in the most prosperous and least
harmful way possible. I used to be chair of The Natural Step Canada, which
organizes the Energy Futures Lab in Alberta, funded in part by Suncor, to do
just that.
Having a more honest and understanding
discussion of these new realities is an essential requirement for this
transition.
Comments
Post a Comment