Policies matter, and when the oil and gas sector is very clearly indicating that American jurisdictions are more attractive for investment, policymakers should take note
Texas is more than two times as attractive than
Alberta for oil and gas investment,
according to a new survey of
petroleum-sector executives
released today by the Fraser
Institute, an independent, non-partisan,
Canadian public policy think-tank.
“Canada’s onerous and
uncertain regulations, along with our
dearth of pipeline capacity has created a competitiveness
chasm between Canada and the United States—particularly between Alberta and Texas,” said Ashley
Stedman, senior policy analyst
at the Fraser Institute and co-author
of the Canada-US Energy Sector Competitiveness Survey.
The survey, conducted
between May and August of this
year, ranks 20 North American
jurisdictions (15 states and five provinces) based
on policies affecting oil and gas investment.
This year, Texas ranked 1st while Alberta ranked 16th
out of 20. Specifically, 80
per cent of survey respondents cited uncertain environmental regulations as a deterrent to investing in
Alberta, compared to only nine per cent
for Texas.
Likewise, 65 per cent of
respondents identified regulatory duplication and inconsistencies as a deterrent to investing
in Alberta compared to eight
per cent for Texas.
Rounding out the top
five most attractive jurisdictions for oil and gas investment are Oklahoma
(2nd), Kansas (3rd),
Wyoming (4th)
and the US-Gulf of Mexico
region (5th).
Among the survey’s 20
jurisdictions, Saskatchewan (13th) was the most attractive Canadian province followed by Newfoundland and Labrador (15), Manitoba (17th)
and British Columbia (19th).
Colorado (20th) was the least-attractive jurisdiction.
“Policies matter, and
when the oil and gas sector is very clearly indicating that American
jurisdictions are more attractive for investment,
policymakers should take note,” said Kenneth
Green, resident scholar and chair of energy and natural resource studies at
the Fraser Institute.
CLICK
HERE to read the Executive Summary
CLICK
HERE to read the full report
Comments
Post a Comment