FRANK LEONARD -- Leadership requires credibility, trust, skill, experience and particularly a sense of timing
Most of the posts to my blog are about leadership – often they are
lessons I’ve learned and practices I use.
This post will address an issue I struggled with: knowing when to lead
and knowing when to follow.
I’ll admit that in my early years I wanted to lead for the sake of
leading – executing a coup at recess to take over the grade five book club is
hard to be proud of. I wasn’t very good
at sports or music so never had illusions of grandeur with those pursuits but
when I grew up and found my passions – business and politics – I was always
looking to take charge.
Yet wanting to take charge is very different from knowing when to
lead. Taking charge and marching off in
a new direction will likely teach you the difference between leadership and
arrogance – such as when you look over your shoulder to notice that no one is
following you.
Leadership requires credibility, trust, skill, experience and particularly
a sense of timing.
In my first months as Mayor I was still the same debater or ‘scrapper’
that I had been as a Councillor – pushing hard to have my solution or proposal
approved. Yet the city manager took me
aside and said ‘sometimes you’ve got to let them wander into the mud before
you can lead them out the other side.’
I learned that my ideas – my leadership – were most often embraced at
the end of the debate rather than at the start.
So rather than my leadership being resisted, and becoming the issue, my
colleagues appreciated being rescued when I knew when to lead.
This also meant that quite often the board or council found a solution
or reached a conclusion without me needing to speak – that is I agreed with an
outcome and followed that course. Other
times I’d make a suggestion that would fall flat and soon after I support
someone else’s input that would be adopted.
By default, had I learned how to follow?
The answer to this question is ‘no’ because knowing when to
follow also requires knowing how to follow and this is not a passive act.
On a corporate board years ago, the Chair took me aside and said my
colleagues were concerned that I didn’t speak up very often. I replied that I was behaving as I had done
in my political life and sat quiet when I tended to agree with a decision or
direction. He suggested a better approach – and what was expected on a
corporate board – was to still contribute to the discussion and add value
perhaps by pointing out unintended consequences, suggesting next steps or
helping to define what success would look like.
This sound and sage advice taught me that following is not a default
position but requires active participation.
Political motives had created a bad habit since I was picking and
choosing what issues to become invested in.
This has no place in the private sector and indeed, if the community’s
best interest is the goal – it shouldn’t prevail in the political domain
either.
My political life had become guided by ‘when to lead, when to follow’
-- yet it was the private sector that taught me the phrase should be ‘when
to lead, how to follow.’
Frank Leonard … served
roles as a Councillor and Mayor of Saanich -- and Chair of the Police Board
from 1986 to 2014. He chaired the Municipal Finance Authority of BC, was
President of the UBCM, and while in business, served as a Director of the BC
Chamber of Commerce, and President of the Victoria Chamber of Commerce.
Check out Frank Leonard’s website for
information on Local Government and Consulting
Comments
Post a Comment