Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FRANK LEONARD -- Leadership requires credibility, trust, skill, experience and particularly a sense of timing


Most of the posts to my blog are about leadership – often they are lessons I’ve learned and practices I use.  This post will address an issue I struggled with: knowing when to lead and knowing when to follow.


I’ll admit that in my early years I wanted to lead for the sake of leading – executing a coup at recess to take over the grade five book club is hard to be proud of.  I wasn’t very good at sports or music so never had illusions of grandeur with those pursuits but when I grew up and found my passions – business and politics – I was always looking to take charge.

Yet wanting to take charge is very different from knowing when to lead.  Taking charge and marching off in a new direction will likely teach you the difference between leadership and arrogance – such as when you look over your shoulder to notice that no one is following you.

Leadership requires credibility, trust, skill, experience and particularly a sense of timing.

In my first months as Mayor I was still the same debater or ‘scrapper’ that I had been as a Councillor – pushing hard to have my solution or proposal approved.  Yet the city manager took me aside and said ‘sometimes you’ve got to let them wander into the mud before you can lead them out the other side.’ 


I learned that my ideas – my leadership – were most often embraced at the end of the debate rather than at the start.  So rather than my leadership being resisted, and becoming the issue, my colleagues appreciated being rescued when I knew when to lead.

This also meant that quite often the board or council found a solution or reached a conclusion without me needing to speak – that is I agreed with an outcome and followed that course.  Other times I’d make a suggestion that would fall flat and soon after I support someone else’s input that would be adopted.

By default, had I learned how to follow?

The answer to this question is ‘no’ because knowing when to follow also requires knowing how to follow and this is not a passive act. 

On a corporate board years ago, the Chair took me aside and said my colleagues were concerned that I didn’t speak up very often.  I replied that I was behaving as I had done in my political life and sat quiet when I tended to agree with a decision or direction. He suggested a better approach – and what was expected on a corporate board – was to still contribute to the discussion and add value perhaps by pointing out unintended consequences, suggesting next steps or helping to define what success would look like. 

This sound and sage advice taught me that following is not a default position but requires active participation.

Political motives had created a bad habit since I was picking and choosing what issues to become invested in.  This has no place in the private sector and indeed, if the community’s best interest is the goal – it shouldn’t prevail in the political domain either. 

My political life had become guided by ‘when to lead, when to follow’ -- yet it was the private sector that taught me the phrase should be ‘when to lead, how to follow.’

Frank Leonard served roles as a Councillor and Mayor of Saanich -- and Chair of the Police Board from 1986 to 2014. He chaired the Municipal Finance Authority of BC, was President of the UBCM, and while in business, served as a Director of the BC Chamber of Commerce, and President of the Victoria Chamber of Commerce.

Check out Frank Leonard’s website for information on Local Government and Consulting

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...

Labels

Show more