Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

If you were buying a new car, would you want a KIA Soul ... a Honda Accord ... or a Lincoln? Would something else meet your needs, and what would that be? Those are questions to know first


Yesterday, the BC government announced that residents, ‘... who feel they are being gouged on their cellphone bills will have help with the appointment of a federal lead on telecommunications ...

They were doing this because, “... according to thousands of responses to a recent government survey, there is frustration, confusion and unhappiness with cellphone contracts and billing ...


As someone who worked in the industry for 5 years, and in retail sales for a very long time, I feel competent to make a few observations.

First ... there are good and bad sales people.  Not matter what the product or service, there will be exceptional people that are knowledgeable, and work very hard to qualify their customers to ensure they get the right product at the right price.  There are also those whose first concern is themselves and getting as much money as they can in commissions.  Then there are those in the middle who are simply order takers.  You lead the sales process and they simply do as you ask. 

A good sales person will take the time to understand your lifestyle, how (and what) you are going to be using your phone and the features it provides.  Will you only need calling that’s local ... Canada-wide ... International ... and the same thing for texting? That’s just the bare minimum.

Second ... no matter what the product being offered, there is a minimum price required to be profitable. 

Canada is a big country, and compared to many in the world, our population is thinly spread.  We also have areas with high mountain peaks.  Providing service means that Canada requires a much larger number of cellular towers than nearly every country in the world.  And you can well imagine, putting one up in the city, or flat terrain, would be relatively a reasonable cost – picture however trying to get people and equipment to some of the terrain in the Rockies?  It’s a big expense, and it needs to be paid for, and it is NOT cheap.

Third ... the quality of product will dictate, to a large extent, the cost of what you purchase.  Let’s use the Behr paint example of Good, Better, Best. 

If you want the newest and latest electronics, with all the bells and whistlers, it has to be paid for some way or other.  That is through the cost of service being provided by your carrier.  One the other hand, if you only need and require a basic phone – or one that’s new in the box but that was on the market a year or two ago – you’ll be paying much less.

I’ve seen a basic good quality phone for a couple hundred dollars ... the latest and greatest however from Google, Samsung, or Apple for example, are going to be well over a thousand dollars. The bottom line ... you’re paying for that.


Fourth ... THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A FREE PHONE ... if you need to, refresh above on #3

While you may pay zero dollars, up front, the cost of your device, will be added to, and included in the cell phone service you pay for.

Fifth ... we as consumers also have a responsibility for what we buy, purchase, and consume as customers.

Are you going to be attracted to, and want, the latest shiny bauble?  Do you need the newest phone with all of the latest technology?  Will a new basic model with the features you actually need be good for you? Do you just need a simple basic phone?  And importantly – how long will you be keeping and using your phone for?

If you are looking at service from a second-tier provider, with a lower price, how good will the service be?  Are there any restrictions?  After sales service?  Will it meet your requirements and needs? If the answer is yes, then it will be good value ... but if not, then you will not be satisfied. 


If you were buying a new vehicle right now, would you want a KIA Soul ... a Honda Accord ... or a Lincoln?  Would something else meet your needs, and what would that be?  Those are questions you would want to know BEFORE you went out to make the purchase.  

In other words, there is a responsibility we have in the transactions we make.

Don’t get suckered in by the shiniest brightest item on the shelf – don’t be taken in by the hard sell, walk away – and only buy what you need!  And make sure, especially in the case of a written contract / agreement with a cellular phone service provider, that they go over with you the costs associated with that service you will be receiving, and what any and all added costs will be.

Finally, I must say that this list of things to be aware of is by no means complete, and I am sure there is more you could add.  Feel free, in the Comments Section below.

As for the government, next steps for them will include engaging stakeholders in more focused discussions and undertaking a legislative review of BC’s consumer protection laws. As well, the Province will engage with Canada’s new government to advocate for better affordability and transparency in the federally regulated telecom sector.


NOW ... HERE’S HOW YOU CAN LEARN MORE:

Premier John Horgan’s letter to MLA Bob D’Eith, who will be advocating for the concerns of British Columbians, to the federal government: https://news.gov.bc.ca/files/20191119_Letter_Telecommunications.pdf

Read the Cellphone Billing Transparency: What We Heard report: https://engage.gov.bc.ca/govtogetherbc/impact/cell-phone-billing-results/

Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission Wireless Code: https://crtc.gc.ca/eng/phone/mobile/codesimpl.htm

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...

Labels

Show more