Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED -- The “middle class” concept is worthy of our raspberries, sneers and snorts


The prospect of any government catering to a specific class of Canadians is an affront to our social principles of fairness and equality. Our Charter holds that we are all equal before, and under, the law ... and tax laws are not excluded.

The current Income Tax Act (ITA), last amended June 21st, 2019 runs to 3,281 pages. That is insane. The last major revision to the ITA was in 1985. In the 34 years since, there have been countless amendments resulting in a volume of law far too lengthy -- and complex -- for any person to read and interpret accurately.
 

“Middle Class” is a deliberately vague euphemism intended to deflect criticism of government policy. The government cannot be accused of failing to ensure prosperity for a group that cannot be defined. Since we have a government Minister to oversee an intangible, we can surmise that her real role is to pump out propaganda telling us how well we are treated by her government.

The “middle class” concept is worthy of our raspberries, sneers and snorts. We need to boo and jeer loudly every time the topic is raised. What counts for us is the “net” line on a pay stub; how much is left after taxes and other deductions. That is what we must live on until the next paystub arrives.

Government efforts to manage our incomes are a disaster.

We don’t need bureaucrats to decide that we need a tax rebate because we have children. They grab our money at the pay window, sit on it for a year, reluctantly let us have a little back and expect us to be grateful!

Cut the crap and increase personal deductions for all taxpayers, and increase the tax deduction for children. Don’t confiscate our funds to begin with and allow us to decide how we will spend the funds on our kids.


Government attempts to manage our personal incomes is an outrageous insult. There isn’t a more poorly disciplined fiscal squanderer than governments. If we all spent and borrowed like our governments, we would be bankrupt in short order.

Stop the insanity.

Governments highly tax alcohol and tobacco products as they are not required to sustain life, and are referred to as “sin taxes”. No product should be taxes higher than the federal and provincial sales taxes. Anything more is social engineering and our government has no authority to tax us to change our habits.

Carbon taxes fall into the same category. Government cannot tax petroleum products in an attempt to regulate their use. Governments have no constitutional authority to tax us for anything other than services they deliver and the actual costs of running the government.

We need much less government in our lives and much more of government paying attention to its constitutional responsibilities. Doing their duty is not a lot of fun, but they cannot continue to spend time, energy and public funds on frivolous nonsense ... and things we don’t need and retain our respect.

They won’t catch on until we tell them, and on occasion, they need a hit on the side of the head with a 2 by 4 just to get their attention. Politicians are not listening to the people.

That must change if we value democracy.


John Feldsted
Political Commentator, Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH: Without a strong local presence, there is NO reason for anyone to tune in to local(?) radio

LOCAL HOMETOWN RADIO IS DYING … and without serious measures put in place, it will likely never see the light of day again. For well over four decades, the Canadian Radio and Television Commission (CRTC) has presided over its’ demise, and for that I say, “Shame”. Without out a word to say enough was enough, the CRTC has allowed corporate Canada to buy up one radio station after the other, and then allowed them to slash staff to the point where some so-called local radio stations do nothing more than air programming that originates from communities well outside the region in which they are located. Case in point?   On CHNL* 610 in Kamloops, the morning show hosted by Vinnie and Randi, DOES NOT originate from Kamloops -- it doesn’t even originate here in BC. It’s a program that Stingray airs across multiple radio stations in Western Canada. It doesn’t end there. Not only are Vinnie and Rando doing mornings on CHNL, but they also show up on sister station Country 103 … and of course o...

Conservative Economic Team Responds to Urgent Industry Concerns

 " For far too long, the BC NDP has ignored the economic challenges facing British Columbians. Manufacturing jobs are vanishing, forestry is in decline, and private sector employment growth has stagnated. Meanwhile, affordability has worsened for both families and businesses. British Columbians deserve better, and we’re here to deliver real solutions to rebuild our economy and create jobs that support everyday working people and their families ." – Gavin Dew, MLA and Shadow Minister for Jobs, Economy, Development, and Innovation.   December 3, 2024, Vancouver, BC – The Conservative economic team met today with business leaders and stakeholders to tackle critical issues impacting British Columbia’s economy. Attended by 9 critics from the Conservative Caucus, this meeting was convened by MLA Gavin Dew – Shadow Minister for Jobs, Economic Development, and Innovation - as a direct response to an October 30th open letter from seven of the province’s largest industry associations. ...

WARD STAMER -- We need certainly in our markets, and certainly in our fibre supply, before we no longer have a forest industry in this province

Image Government of BC I think we all realize that the threat of Trump’s 25% tariff is like other provocative statements he’s made in the past. That said, we should have reason to be concerned. Tariffs don’t benefit anyone. A tariff of that magnitude – included on our own softwood lumber exports, will make things more expensive for Americans, and cause friction in the supply chain. If imposed, a twenty-five percent tariff will be equally detrimental to the citizens and economy of the United States, as well as the people of BC. There are two things, however, of equal concern to the threat of punitive tariffs by incoming U.S. President-elect Donald Trump. One is our antiquated stumpage fees. It is a legacy from decades ago, and one incapable of responding to changing market conditions. We need to revamp our stumpage system to better reflect market conditions, and our economic costs. Instead, a value-added tax system will be instantly responsive to current market conditions and will encou...

Labels

Show more