Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED -- Keeping us in the dark does not indicate we have a responsive government attuned to our needs


Why do the goblins hired by political parties assume we are so tied to ideology, that we will send them money under any, and every, circumstance?

No party fared well in the 2019 federal election campaign. The Conservatives, Liberals, NDP and Greens under-performed, didn’t meet their own expectations, and left a discouraged and disgusted post election population.

In the 30 days since the election, no party has tried to connect with the electorate -- that is disgusting.

Our parliament will convene December 5th & 6th to elect a Speaker ... stand down for the weekend, and reconvene from the 9th through the 13th to deliver a speech from the throne.  They will get some preliminary response from the opposition, and then skulk off the stage until January 27th.

The House does not usually sit until the last week in January, presumably to give the government time to work on the budget, usually presented in mid-March.

However, the House usually sits for an average of just under 20 and a half days during November and December -- this includes 7 days each in 2015 and 2019. Keeping us in the dark does not indicate we have a responsive government attuned to our needs.


The normal parliamentary cycle allows for about 135 sitting days in a calendar year.

We are told that parliament must introduce omnibus bills due to lack of time and that a budget review must be curtailed due to lack of time. The cycle needs to be adjusted to provide for 200 sitting days per year. Surely MPs can sit in Parliament for the same duration as grade school children.

There has been little to write about since the election. Pompous posturing by political party leaders is not worthy of commentary. The government has not laid out plans for its priorities. Opposition parties have been silent on what their priorities are. The Prime Minister has been meeting with the leaders of opposition parties, but news of the outcomes is scarce.

It appears that the parties and their leaders are gearing up to continue the 2019 election campaign with accusations, haranguing and insults hurled across the isles instead of reasoned debate of issues and policies. It will not do. We did not elect gladiators to combat in parliament. That is repulsive.

Sooner or later, these loons are going to discover that they are required to dialogue, with the great unwashed, if they want our donations and votes. They are in Ottawa to represent us, not to bicker and brawl among themselves.

Until our needs are addressed and met, they are useless to us and not worthy of our support ... the days of a government deciding what our priorities are must end.


John Feldsted
Political Commentator, Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more