ADAM OLSEN -- How are we ensuring that forest-dependent communities will be able to have a resource they can rely on in future decades as the impacts of climate change take hold?
Last week in
Question Period I asked the Honourable Doug Donaldson about the impact of the
growing risks of climate change on our forests in British Columbia.
Public
attention is focusing in recent months on the forest industry that is
controlled by multi-national corporations shuttering operations, cutting jobs
and putting into question of the future of rural and remote communities in our
province. People in those communities are concerned about whose interests those
companies are looking out for. There is a growing concern that it is not the
local interests.
The aspect
that I dug into this week is not often discussed. What role do our forests play
in a changing climate? How does a changing climate impact our forests?
What is our
government innovate the forestry sector?
These are
incredibly important questions we will continue ask.
FOREST
MANAGEMENT AND CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION
Adam Olsen: Yesterday
my colleague drew the connection between the climate risks facing our community
and the management of our forests, for the climate risks also could have huge
impacts on the forests across the province. According to the climate risk
assessment quietly released by government, climate change could negatively
affect forest growth rates, increase forest mortality and change forest
composition. Climate-induced drought could increase forest die-off and make
trees more vulnerable to wildfire and pest outbreaks.
These
changes are happening now. My daughter Ella is growing up in a world where
summer means fire. The skies above our house have been blanketed by smoke for
half of the summers of her life. Luckily, we got a break this year, but who
knows what next year will bring? The risks facing our forest sector are going
to be exacerbated as we move forward.
My question
is to the Minister of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource
Operations and Rural Development. How are we ensuring that forest-dependent
communities will be able to have a resource they can rely on in future decades
as the impacts of climate change take hold?
Doug
Donaldson: I thank the member for his well-thought-out and presented question. When it
comes to fighting climate change, our government takes our responsibility very
seriously. Unlike some members on the other side, our government and our
colleagues in the Green caucus know the science is clear, and we need real
action now.
As far as the
Preliminary Strategic Climate Risk Assessment -- which was a report that is
mandated in our CleanBC plan that we worked on with
the Green caucus -- there are a number of factors pointed out around forestry
and around the need for innovation in forestry when it comes to the forests and
the future.
The member
is correct to point out the incredible fires that we've had in 2017 and 2018 as
a result of forests drying out and a change in climate. The innovation in
practice — one example that we've had, and we've had many, is prescribed
burning. We're allotting $10 million a year for the next three years to use
traditional Indigenous knowledge and create prescribed burns to lower the fuel
load and therefore lower the amount of greenhouse gases that are emitted into the
atmosphere from unplanned fires.
We have
innovation in management. The member asked around innovation in management. We
have a seed tree program where we're growing trees that are going to be better
adapted to the climate change characteristics in the future. And we have
innovation in technology. We've been working on an app in the field, a biomass
utilization app that will assess biomass volumes and potential greenhouse gas
emission benefits in real time. That's been supported by Canada under the
transformative technologies’ agreement.
They don't seem to want to know about innovation in forestry, and I can understand that, because they ignored forestry for 16 years.
We'll keep
working hard to support innovation in our forest sector.
Adam Olsen: I thank the
minister for the answer to the question and the answer to the supplemental and
maybe the supplemental for next week as well.
We need to
transform our approach to forestry in this province, especially as we confront
the massive challenge of climate change.
We must be
better stewards, and we must start managing for value instead of volume. This
is the only way to create resilient local communities and dependable jobs. We
could produce everything from wood fibre insulation, mass timber or a range of
products to replace single-use plastics. Instead of leading this change, BC. is
exporting raw logs, we continue to lose forestry jobs, and we are a net
importer of engineered wood products.
Sweden is an
example of how things could be different. Despite having a similarly sized
harvesting land base, Sweden's forestry industry employs almost twice as many
people as BC's. The difference: they manage their forests for value and on the
basis of science.
My question
is to the minister. Forestry-dependent communities are hurting across this
province. Now is the time for transformative change of our forest management in
BC, not just for band-aids or for changes around the outside. What specific
actions has he taken to spur the innovation in this industry so that we add
value, maximize local jobs and responsibly manage our forests?
Doug
Donaldson: I apologize for the length of my answers. It's just that I'm so
passionate about the future of forestry in this province. I couldn't agree with
the member more about maximizing value of the logs that come out of our forests
versus maximizing volume. Part of that is true. The exponential growth of raw
log exports under the previous government is something that we've addressed
directly under the coast forest sector revitalization initiative.
The member
asked how we're addressing getting more value out of the forest? I can give him
a very, very good example.
Earlier this
year, the Premier announced that we, in BC, have become the first province in
Canada, as an early adopter of 12-storey building regulations around building
12-storey buildings out of wood. First in Canada. That will end up … that's
directly in regards to building taller buildings out of engineered wood
products.
That adds
value to the value chain. That creates more jobs in the forest, more jobs in
the factories and makes more stable rural communities.
Comments
Post a Comment