Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ADAM OLSEN -- How are we ensuring that forest-dependent communities will be able to have a resource they can rely on in future decades as the impacts of climate change take hold?


Last week in Question Period I asked the Honourable Doug Donaldson about the impact of the growing risks of climate change on our forests in British Columbia.

Public attention is focusing in recent months on the forest industry that is controlled by multi-national corporations shuttering operations, cutting jobs and putting into question of the future of rural and remote communities in our province. People in those communities are concerned about whose interests those companies are looking out for. There is a growing concern that it is not the local interests.


The aspect that I dug into this week is not often discussed. What role do our forests play in a changing climate? How does a changing climate impact our forests?

What is our government innovate the forestry sector?

These are incredibly important questions we will continue ask.


FOREST MANAGEMENT AND CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION

Adam Olsen: Yesterday my colleague drew the connection between the climate risks facing our community and the management of our forests, for the climate risks also could have huge impacts on the forests across the province. According to the climate risk assessment quietly released by government, climate change could negatively affect forest growth rates, increase forest mortality and change forest composition. Climate-induced drought could increase forest die-off and make trees more vulnerable to wildfire and pest outbreaks.

These changes are happening now. My daughter Ella is growing up in a world where summer means fire. The skies above our house have been blanketed by smoke for half of the summers of her life. Luckily, we got a break this year, but who knows what next year will bring? The risks facing our forest sector are going to be exacerbated as we move forward.


My question is to the Minister of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations and Rural Development. How are we ensuring that forest-dependent communities will be able to have a resource they can rely on in future decades as the impacts of climate change take hold?

Doug Donaldson: I thank the member for his well-thought-out and presented question. When it comes to fighting climate change, our government takes our responsibility very seriously. Unlike some members on the other side, our government and our colleagues in the Green caucus know the science is clear, and we need real action now.

As far as the Preliminary Strategic Climate Risk Assessment -- which was a report that is mandated in our CleanBC plan that we worked on with the Green caucus -- there are a number of factors pointed out around forestry and around the need for innovation in forestry when it comes to the forests and the future.
 
Forest Minister Doug Donaldson
The member is correct to point out the incredible fires that we've had in 2017 and 2018 as a result of forests drying out and a change in climate. The innovation in practice — one example that we've had, and we've had many, is prescribed burning. We're allotting $10 million a year for the next three years to use traditional Indigenous knowledge and create prescribed burns to lower the fuel load and therefore lower the amount of greenhouse gases that are emitted into the atmosphere from unplanned fires.

We have innovation in management. The member asked around innovation in management. We have a seed tree program where we're growing trees that are going to be better adapted to the climate change characteristics in the future. And we have innovation in technology. We've been working on an app in the field, a biomass utilization app that will assess biomass volumes and potential greenhouse gas emission benefits in real time. That's been supported by Canada under the transformative technologies’ agreement.

They don't seem to want to know about innovation in forestry, and I can understand that, because they ignored forestry for 16 years.

We'll keep working hard to support innovation in our forest sector.

Adam Olsen: I thank the minister for the answer to the question and the answer to the supplemental and maybe the supplemental for next week as well.
We need to transform our approach to forestry in this province, especially as we confront the massive challenge of climate change.

We must be better stewards, and we must start managing for value instead of volume. This is the only way to create resilient local communities and dependable jobs. We could produce everything from wood fibre insulation, mass timber or a range of products to replace single-use plastics. Instead of leading this change, BC. is exporting raw logs, we continue to lose forestry jobs, and we are a net importer of engineered wood products.

Sweden is an example of how things could be different. Despite having a similarly sized harvesting land base, Sweden's forestry industry employs almost twice as many people as BC's. The difference: they manage their forests for value and on the basis of science.

My question is to the minister. Forestry-dependent communities are hurting across this province. Now is the time for transformative change of our forest management in BC, not just for band-aids or for changes around the outside. What specific actions has he taken to spur the innovation in this industry so that we add value, maximize local jobs and responsibly manage our forests?

Doug Donaldson: I apologize for the length of my answers. It's just that I'm so passionate about the future of forestry in this province. I couldn't agree with the member more about maximizing value of the logs that come out of our forests versus maximizing volume. Part of that is true. The exponential growth of raw log exports under the previous government is something that we've addressed directly under the coast forest sector revitalization initiative.

The member asked how we're addressing getting more value out of the forest? I can give him a very, very good example.

Earlier this year, the Premier announced that we, in BC, have become the first province in Canada, as an early adopter of 12-storey building regulations around building 12-storey buildings out of wood. First in Canada. That will end up … that's directly in regards to building taller buildings out of engineered wood products.

That adds value to the value chain. That creates more jobs in the forest, more jobs in the factories and makes more stable rural communities.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more