Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ROTHENBURGER – There’s nothing wrong with being disinterested in politics, or not paying attention to an election campaign, but there is in blindly marking an ‘X’ on a ballot


Reprinted with permission of the author, Mel Rothenburger. Mel’s commentaries are also published in CFJC Today

FIRST THING MONDAY MORNING, I’m going to get up and drive to my designated polling station. It’s a small polling station; very few people vote there so it likely won’t be crowded.


It will take only a few minutes to check in, mark my ballot and put it in the box. It will, however, take me more than half an hour to drive from home to the station and back.

How much simpler and easier it would be to vote online, to mail in a ballot, or even to vote in advance at one of the other polling places.

It bugs me when people say we have to find easier ways for people to vote because that’s the only way we can increase the turnout. I don’t believe it.

Democracy shouldn’t be run from the comfort of our own homes; it should require at least a minimum of physical activity. If we no longer have the energy to go out to a polling booth to mark a ballot, we’re definitely in trouble.

Of course, accommodations have to be made for medical-facility shut-ins and so on, but the rest of us should be committed enough to our country, and thankful enough of the opportunity, to go park near a polling station and even stand in line for a while if that’s what it takes.

There’s a feeling of community at the polling station. It feels good to vote there, in a way you could never get voting on your home computer. The experience makes you proud to be a Canadian.

There were quite a few complaints about confusion and lineups at the advance polls. A lot of people got through it quickly but a lot didn’t. Some complained about the grumpy Elections Canada people.


Voting shouldn’t be a frustration but, as others said in rebuttal, we should be happy we live in a country where we have a say in who runs the place. If it involves slow lineups and grouchy polling staff, so be it. It’s all part of the experience.

Those temporary staff must go blind looking at lists and checking ID, and no doubt get impatient after a while. Yet, for the most part I’ve found them cheerful and helpful.

By the way, I’ve never been an advocate for the old “vote as you wish but please vote” approach. If you haven’t paid much attention to the campaign, don’t know any of the party policies, have never heard of some of the candidates and haven’t tried to find out, then stay home. Enjoy that couch.


Ideally, of course, everyone would be well up to speed. If you don’t vote, you’re leaving the decision up to everybody else. We all know people who are actually proud of not voting. They see it as their way of rebelling against a system they see as corrupt.

That’s not a good reason not to vote, nor is it a good reason not to take part by studying parties and platforms. There’s the old saying that we get the kind of government we deserve.

I’ve reserved my decision on who to vote for until the campaign ends but I know now which way I’m leaning. More than any past election, I’ve found myself focusing on which party will run the country rather than local issues or interests.

My vote will be influenced much less by local candidates or by party leaders than it will be by the policies of the parties. Sadly, it means looking at policies that will do the least harm rather than the most good.

This is one of those elections in which turnout could be pivotal to the result. In last weekend’s advance polls, 4.7 million people voted, up 29 per cent from advance polls in 2015. In 2015, the increase in advance poll voting was 70 per cent over 2011.

In all, 27 million Canadians are eligible to vote. With the election looking so tight, the success of parties in getting their supporters to the polls will be crucial.

The overall turnout in 2015 was 68 per cent, the highest since 1993. In fact, it was about the same as several elections in the 1880s, and higher than the 1890s. Throughout our country’s history, with a few exceptions up or down, election turnouts have been remarkably consistent.

In Kamloops – Thompson - Cariboo, by the way, the turnout in 2015 was 73 per cent, up a whopping 10 percent from 2011.

So those who wring their hands over the alleged crisis in federal election turnouts, relax. Be happy.

Think, then go out and vote.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more