Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ROTHENBURGER – There’s nothing wrong with being disinterested in politics, or not paying attention to an election campaign, but there is in blindly marking an ‘X’ on a ballot


Reprinted with permission of the author, Mel Rothenburger. Mel’s commentaries are also published in CFJC Today

FIRST THING MONDAY MORNING, I’m going to get up and drive to my designated polling station. It’s a small polling station; very few people vote there so it likely won’t be crowded.


It will take only a few minutes to check in, mark my ballot and put it in the box. It will, however, take me more than half an hour to drive from home to the station and back.

How much simpler and easier it would be to vote online, to mail in a ballot, or even to vote in advance at one of the other polling places.

It bugs me when people say we have to find easier ways for people to vote because that’s the only way we can increase the turnout. I don’t believe it.

Democracy shouldn’t be run from the comfort of our own homes; it should require at least a minimum of physical activity. If we no longer have the energy to go out to a polling booth to mark a ballot, we’re definitely in trouble.

Of course, accommodations have to be made for medical-facility shut-ins and so on, but the rest of us should be committed enough to our country, and thankful enough of the opportunity, to go park near a polling station and even stand in line for a while if that’s what it takes.

There’s a feeling of community at the polling station. It feels good to vote there, in a way you could never get voting on your home computer. The experience makes you proud to be a Canadian.

There were quite a few complaints about confusion and lineups at the advance polls. A lot of people got through it quickly but a lot didn’t. Some complained about the grumpy Elections Canada people.


Voting shouldn’t be a frustration but, as others said in rebuttal, we should be happy we live in a country where we have a say in who runs the place. If it involves slow lineups and grouchy polling staff, so be it. It’s all part of the experience.

Those temporary staff must go blind looking at lists and checking ID, and no doubt get impatient after a while. Yet, for the most part I’ve found them cheerful and helpful.

By the way, I’ve never been an advocate for the old “vote as you wish but please vote” approach. If you haven’t paid much attention to the campaign, don’t know any of the party policies, have never heard of some of the candidates and haven’t tried to find out, then stay home. Enjoy that couch.


Ideally, of course, everyone would be well up to speed. If you don’t vote, you’re leaving the decision up to everybody else. We all know people who are actually proud of not voting. They see it as their way of rebelling against a system they see as corrupt.

That’s not a good reason not to vote, nor is it a good reason not to take part by studying parties and platforms. There’s the old saying that we get the kind of government we deserve.

I’ve reserved my decision on who to vote for until the campaign ends but I know now which way I’m leaning. More than any past election, I’ve found myself focusing on which party will run the country rather than local issues or interests.

My vote will be influenced much less by local candidates or by party leaders than it will be by the policies of the parties. Sadly, it means looking at policies that will do the least harm rather than the most good.

This is one of those elections in which turnout could be pivotal to the result. In last weekend’s advance polls, 4.7 million people voted, up 29 per cent from advance polls in 2015. In 2015, the increase in advance poll voting was 70 per cent over 2011.

In all, 27 million Canadians are eligible to vote. With the election looking so tight, the success of parties in getting their supporters to the polls will be crucial.

The overall turnout in 2015 was 68 per cent, the highest since 1993. In fact, it was about the same as several elections in the 1880s, and higher than the 1890s. Throughout our country’s history, with a few exceptions up or down, election turnouts have been remarkably consistent.

In Kamloops – Thompson - Cariboo, by the way, the turnout in 2015 was 73 per cent, up a whopping 10 percent from 2011.

So those who wring their hands over the alleged crisis in federal election turnouts, relax. Be happy.

Think, then go out and vote.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...

Labels

Show more