Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

‘Unless John Horgan can come up with a plan to grow the economy and reduce debt then British Columbians better hold on to their wallets’ ~~ Stephanie Cadieux


Yesterday we had two different accounts of BC’s economy – and of course they did not match up. From the BC NDP’s Finance Minister, Carole James, came these words:

Today’s update from S & P Global Ratings shows that our plan to invest in people while balancing the budget is not only possible, but also fundamental to building a strong and sustainable economy

 
BC Finance Minister Carole James
Image from Facebook
 

We have sustained responsible budget management and invested in our most valuable resource — the people who power our province”, she continued.

The governments media release, regarding S&P’s Global rating, went on to state that ... along with an expectation of operating surpluses, the government has an ambitious capital plan focused on investment in productive assets, such as transportation infrastructure, health facilities, and school replacement programs ...

Andrew Weaver’s BC Liberals however, were not so easily persuaded of good times ahead.  BC Liberal Finance Co-critics, Shirley Bond and Stephanie Cadieux, instead issued qualms ... after ratings agency Standard and Poor’s (S&P) threatened to downgrade BC’s AAA credit rating amid concerns about rising debt to revenue rates.

BC Liberals went on, stating that according to S&P ... British Columbia is not prepared to withstand any economic shocks or downturns should debt levels continue to rise.


Cadieux stated, “Unless John Horgan can come up with a plan to grow the economy and reduce debt then British Columbians better hold on to their wallets.”

So ... according to the BC NDP interpretation of the S & P Report ... “BC’s financial management practices remain very strong.” 

While the BC Liberals understanding is ... “if fiscal slippage or other policy decisions cause this ratio to rise notably above current expected levels, it could begin to erode BC's resiliency to the next economic downturn.”

I for one will tend to side with the BC Liberals on this one.  The governments fiscal house, is one all should be concerned with. Rising debt means that interest on that debt is rising as well.

The updated Fiscal and Debt Summary of the BC government (June 30th, 2019) states that total taxpayer supported provincial debt is $71.32 BILLION dollars.

So, how is this debt being paid for?  Looking at that same BC governments Fiscal and Debt Summary, it indicates that taxpayer supported interest is 3.2 cents for every dollar of government revenue.

WHAT A WASTE!!



Given what the BC government, and the BC Liberals, are stating ... it would appear that our fiscal house is on a knife edge, and a downturn could tip us into a nightmare of cuts to core government services. And according the BC government, in an April Report to investors that the government was looking to provide them with financing, there are indeed risks to our fiscal well-being.

These risks, as outlined by the government, include:
... uncertainty regarding global trade policy

... slower than expected global economic activity, particularly in Asia and other regions

... disruption to economic growth in Europe

...timing of investment and hiring related to the LNG Canada project

... stronger than expected impacts of past and future monetary policy tightening on interest rate sensitive sectors

... exchange rate and commodity price volatility 

These are serious concerns, not to be taken lightly – especially given repeated warnings of a possible upcoming recession.

Government spending has a direct cost to the people of BC, and the business community, therefore the government must be prudent with the financial resources we provide.

And those who continue to cry out for more and more government spending need to realize the approaching consequences if it does not end. 

FOOTNOTE ... all political parties, in the current federal election, also seem hell-bent on what they are willing to offer to Canadians. And far too many are failing to realize the cost of these goodies will be borne by you and I. With ten days remaining until we vote, I can only cringe thinking of what still remains when it comes to upcoming announcements in what has become a spending frenzy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more