FRASER INSTITUTE -- At key moments, when facing big challenges, these governments were willing to reform and reduce spending
On Thursday, the United Conservative Party
led by Premier Jason Kenney delivered its first budget. On the campaign trail,
UCP members regularly stressed the need to tackle Alberta’s deficit, which is
projected to total $8.7 billion in 2019/20. The government’s first budget shows
it’s willing to meet those words with action. Alberta’s era of fiscal
complacency has ended.
First, let’s look at the grim reality of
Alberta’s finances.
The province has run budget deficits every
year except one since 2008/09. Largely as a result, provincial net debt has
soared to nearly $37 billion. And yet, despite the severity of these
challenges, fiscal policy in Alberta has in recent years been characterized by
unrelenting complacency.
For example, instead of confronting the
deficit challenge, the NDP government of Rachel Notley allowed it to fester.
Alberta kept increasing nominal government program spending year after year.
Predictably, large deficits remained and the debt kept growing.
But in this budget, the Kenney government
will finally reduce nominal spending, with a spending decrease of 1.6 per cent
over four years. As a result, Alberta is now forecast to reduce its budget
deficit in coming years before returning to balance in 2022 / 23. And shrinking,
and then eliminating, the deficit will slow the pace of debt accumulation.
Taxpayers always pay the interest on
government debt, which takes away money that could otherwise be used for tax
relief or public services.
Of course, this budget marks the beginning of
the process—not the end. The government must remain committed to its spending
targets, which will require meaningful program reforms in the health and
education sectors.
Further, government-sector workers in Alberta
enjoy
a 9.6% pay premium over similarly-skilled and educated private-sector
employees. To slay the deficit on schedule, the government will likely have to
reduce this gap.
There are bound to be some who criticize the
size of the government’s planned spending reductions. On this point, some
historical context is needed.
During the 1990s, governments across Canada
introduced much larger spending reductions to eliminate their deficits,
including the Romanow NDP government in Saskatchewan, the Chretien federal
Liberals and the Alberta government, which in the ’90s reduced program spending
by approximately 20 per cent.
At key moments, when facing big challenges,
these governments were willing to reform and reduce spending. It’s important to
keep this history in mind and recognize that the spending reductions in
Thursday’s budget are moderate by comparison.
None of this is to say the government’s plan
is perfect. Indeed, there are risks to a four-year path to budgetary balance.
Again, as seen in the 1990s, faster
deficit-reduction efforts (over two or three years) have a much more consistent
record of success. Indeed, a faster path to balance in Alberta would have meant
less debt accumulation in coming years. The slower four-year path also means a
longer period of exposure to various revenue risks (including a recession),
which could derail the plan.
Notwithstanding these points, if the Kenney
government follows through on its plan, its first budget will represent a
turning point in Alberta fiscal history. The previous government refused to
reduce spending at all, instead waiting and hoping for resource revenue gains
to eliminate the deficit.
This budget takes an active approach to the
deficit, planning to reduce government spending over time by reforming programs.
It seems Alberta’s era of fiscal complacency
has finally come to an end.
AUTHORS:
Steve Lafleur is
Senior Policy Analyst at the Fraser Institute. He holds an M.A. in
Political Science from Wilfrid Laurier University and a B.A. from Laurentian
University where he studied Political Science and Economics.
Ben Eisen is a Senior
Fellow in Fiscal and Provincial Prosperity Studies and former Director
of Provincial Prosperity Studies at the Fraser Institute. He holds a BA from
the University of Toronto and an MPP from the University of Toronto’s School of
Public Policy and Governance.
Comments
Post a Comment