GORDON WILSON -- Canadians tend to sigh, yawn or roll their eyes when the discussion turns to the Constitution, but it’s is the very foundation that makes our country work
To say there's an
elephant in the room doesn't sound Canadian, so let me say instead, there's a
large bull moose stomping all over the federal election trail. Ignored for the
most part until recently, it raised its horny head when one of the federal
leaders slipped on a patty it left on the trail.
The moose is of course
the division of powers between the federal government and the provinces, and
while it has frequented election campaigns throughout our history, rarely has
it been so belligerent or poised to do so much damage.
When I hear a federal
leader, regardless of his or her electoral prospects, glibly say he will give
provincial premiers veto over national projects, I am concerned.
NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh
said that his government would give veto powers to the provinces over major
federal infrastructure projects such as pipelines. What he didn’t tell the
voters is how he intended to do that. In order for Singh to grant such power to
the provinces, he would have to either amend the Canadian Constitution, or
ignore it.
Section 91 gives the
federal government jurisdiction over resource projects that cross provincial
lines, but the Premiers of British Columbia and Quebec have both taken steps to
try to block national projects; Trans Mountain Pipeline (TMX) in the case of BC
and the Energy East pipeline designed to carry Alberta oil across Quebec to
export facilities in New Brunswick.
Singh’s statement didn’t
get much play, I suspect because the NDP is currently still low in the polls and
unlikely to be the next government. Still, it is worth noting that Premiers
Legault and Horgan are in government -- and are challenging federal
Constitutional authority.
François Legault has
said that no pipeline would pass through “Quebec territory”. Horgan, despite a
unanimous Appellant Court ruling reaffirming federal constitutional
jurisdiction in this matter, plans to appeal the decision. This, he maintains,
is required to protect “British Columbia’s interest” and protect “British Columbia’s
coast”.
While Legault and Horgan
have their fingers on the pulse of their respective political base, and likely
to win favour in those quarters, the resulting implications arising from their
actions are profound for Canada’s energy future. The action of the BC
government cost the Canadian taxpayers $4.5 billion after private interests
decided that they would not risk capital.
This was because having
followed the rules for project approval, regardless of what you may think of
those rules, they changed mid-stream sending a chill over any comparable
prospective investments.
Justin Trudeau’s Liberal
government was left with little choice if the national interest was to be
served. His government purchased the line because it was vital to Canada to
assist the producing province, Alberta, in accessing Canadian tidewater thus
providing market diversity rather than being forced to sell product at a
discount to the US only to buy it back at a premium.
Conservative leader
Scheer talks about a national energy corridor, flanked by Conservative premiers
who support such a proposition, but Legault is steadfast in his opposition. Scheer,
who like every other leader has his eye on vital Quebec seats, stopped short of
suggesting that the federal government has the constitutional authority to move
ahead with such a project.
So, the question is, who
in this federal election is campaigning for Canada?
Trudeau certainly stood
firm as Prime Minister and took the necessary steps to ensure the Trans
Mountain Pipeline would become a reality, but given the rising number of people
suffering from regional myopia, he may pay a political price for that in BC.
The Quebec Conference of
1864 contemplated two orders of government, federal and provincial, and in the
Constitution Act of 1867 at Confederation the distribution of powers between
those two jurisdictions were defined. After 1949 these powers were judged by
the Supreme Court of Canada, granting residuary power to the federal
government.
The Constitution Act of
1982 clarified amending powers and matters relating to taxation, and
equalization payments to provinces to provide comparable access to public
services at comparable tax levels. It still contemplated only two levels of
government.
But fast forward to
today and we see that our moose has just doubled in size.
The Federation of
Canadian Municipalities is increasing its demand to be recognized as a level of
government. We have already witnessed some mayors flexing their political
muscle by trying to use the courts to permit them a veto over the building of
national infrastructure running though their cities.
Indigenous authorities,
either through elected councils or through hereditary chiefs, are increasingly
being given greater recognition by Canadian courts with respect to Indigenous
rights over “their lands”, and add to that the pressure on all levels of
government to adopt and adhere to the United Nations Declaration on the Rights
of Indigenous People (UNDRIP) and the issue of governance and jurisdictional
authority becomes very much more complicated.
We have already heard
the Premier of British Columbia suggest that he may support BC First Nations in
their court action against the Trans Mountain Pipeline, and BC is currently working on amending
provincial statutes to comply with UNDRIP -- despite a lack of public discourse
to enlighten the general population as to what that means, or how this
provincial action is consistent with federal constitutional authority.
Canadians tend to sigh,
yawn or roll their eyes when the discussion turns to the Constitution. But our
Constitution is the very foundation that makes our country work.
It is time that we pay
attention to and take issue with rising demands for local autonomy, authority
and autocracy.
Canada is too important
for us to ignore this moose on the trail.
Gordon Wilson is a writer and business consultant who served as an elected MLA
from 1991 -2001. During that time, he held several cabinet posts
including Minister of Forests, Aboriginal Affairs and Minister of Finance. He
has consulted widely matters pertaining to the Canadian resource economy, and
the Canadian Constitution. He currently lives on a small sheep farm in Powell
River.
Comments
Post a Comment