Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ADAM OLSEN - Our recycling system has been designed and marketed, to have us believe we don’t need to reduce consumption; you can just recycle the product


Earlier this summer, I invited people to participate in the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change Strategy consultation and engagement on plastic waste and recycling. British Columbians are good re-cyclers, but we need to do better and the Ministry is working to that end.

I’ve discussed recycling, packaging, and plastic waste a few times in the pages of this blog, always with the perspective that the absolute best recycling we can do is none at all. By that I mean: first reduce consumption, then reuse items, and only after all that, recycle.

Unfortunately, our recycling system has been designed and marketed to have us all believing that we do not need to reduce consumption because you can just recycle the product. This is reinforced by the next product you buy proclaiming in bold print that it was made with X% of recycled material.

Congratulations!

Well done!

... we have all contributed to creating a more circular economy rather than the previous generation whose single use plastics are filling our landfills.

Not so quick!


The other day, I watched the episode of CBC Marketplace (Where does your recycling really end up?) where David Common goes undercover to look at the plastic recycling industry. It’s not good! It was a stark reminder of the personal work I need to do reducing my consumption and the work the provincial government needs to do regulating industry, not just the recyclers, but also the producers.

Reducing consumption and plastic pollution
According to Common, British Columbians go to great lengths to recycle only to learn that so much of the work is just land-filled or chipped and burned in a waste-to-energy facility. Clearly regulation is not enough. When Common’s team sent plastic material off with three BC recyclers, only a third was actually recycled. That is not good enough.


I heard from rural communities, at the Union of BC Municipalities, that the recycling program the BC Liberals set up is leaving them behind – that’s because the system can achieve the targeted percentage of diversion just from the urban centres alone.

This is classic BC Liberal politics: talk up support for rural B.C. and then under deliver. This is yet another one of their broken systems that needs reformation, including better oversight and proper enforcement.

The Marketplace episode paints a devastating picture of the recycling industry. Containers of Canadian plastic polluting the land, water and air of cities and towns in Southeast Asia, creating a spike in cancer there, is shameful.

It starts with each one of us. Admittedly, I have a lot of work to reform my own habits and behaviours. I consume way more than I need to! And, we also need to lean in to the process currently underway by the Ministry.

This is the perfect time to reform a system that is letting British Columbians down. I don’t think any of us want to contribute to creating “cancer towns” in other parts of the world ... however, that is exactly what is happening.


Adam Olsen ... is a Green Party Member of the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia for Saanich North and the Islands. Born in Victoria, BC in 1976, Adam has lived, worked and played his entire life on the Saanich Peninsula. He is a member of Tsartlip First Nation (W̱JOȽEȽP), where he and his wife, Emily, are raising their two children, Silas and Ella.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more