Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

GORDON WILSON – Trudeau’s been the main target of his rivals, May, Singh and Scheer, who have been relentless and personal in their efforts to point out this man’s imperfections


There is only one outcome in this federal election that makes any sense to me and that is to restore a majority Liberal government in Ottawa.

Why?

Because Canada will only survive as a nation if we recognize that this country, Canada, is greater than the sum of its parts.


The practice of politics and the electoral process has vastly improved as more progressive social values shape our selection dynamic.

And yet, this election campaign has been centered around issues that cater to limited special interest groups, provincial premiers and, in the largest urban centers, an attitude of “what’s in it for me?”.

This is unfortunate, because we have a broad cross-section of Canadian society represented by many really talented candidates who have stepped forward seeking the honour of elected office.

I am sure that most are sincere in their appeal for your vote.

But in their effort to gain that coveted seat in Parliament, you should push back when they say that they want to represent “your interests” in Ottawa.

A strong Canadian nation governed by its Constitution, and protective of individual rights and freedoms as spelled out in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, advances and protects all our interests.

What exactly are those interests?


The right of a federal government to implement national programs that advance the interests of all Canadians and is not held hostage by pugnacious provincial authorities, foreign-funded interest groups, and a minority populace of hyphenated Canadians who somehow think their special interests should get priority when demanding government attention, and that the state and the tax payers who support it, owes them whatever it is they deem they need.

Elizabeth May and the Greens, suggest that their particular response to the climate crisis represents your interest.

May would have us believe that a fundamental restructuring of our national economy which will, in the short term at least, result in the loss of hundreds of thousands of high paying jobs, is in your interest because new, as yet unspecified, jobs will result from the “single greatest economic opportunity of our time”; the climate crisis.

Jagmeet Singh, performed well in the national debates and comes across as a personable fellow who cares greatly for every Canadian and who is going to “work for you”... that is, provided you don’t mind him spending massive deficits, doubling the national debt and provided you support his planned assault on the earned wealth of high-income Canadians from whom he plans to take money to give to “Canadians who need it”.

When Singh smiles into the television camera and says I am going to be working for you, he isn’t talking to Canadians who earn more that $100,000 per year.

And when he suggests that he will permit the premiers veto power over national projects and give them ability to protect provincial statues that deny minority rights, he isn’t speaking to those Canadians who believe in a strong constitutionally founded national government that has a broader interest than those exhibited by parochial provincial politicians.

Andrew Scheer’s solution to almost every problem is to get rid of Justin Trudeau, leaving us to our imagination as to what exactly he would do for Canada should he be given a mandate to succeed him.

To be sure, Scheer has brought forward a number of policy initiatives that reinstates a fairly substantial part of the economic and tax programs of past Prime Minister Stephen Harper, which is odd considering Canadians so soundly rejected those initiatives four years ago.

And so, we come to, Justin Trudeau.

As the incumbent, Trudeau has been the main target of his rivals, May, Singh and Scheer, who have been relentless and personal in their efforts to point out this man’s imperfections.

What makes Trudeau stand out from the others in this election is his steadfast commitment to Canada as a strong federal state.

In the English Leader’s debate, he was the only person on stage to take on Bloc leader Yves-François Blanchet, by defending Quebecers as Canadians and was the only leader to clearly state his opposition to and potential action against Bill 21 which strips minority rights in that province.

Trudeau is also the only leader who has stepped forward with concrete action to build infrastructure that will allow Canadian product to reach Asian markets and thus remove the strangle hold the Americans currently have on our raw materials.

Ironically, standing up for Canadian interests and defending Canadian values might have made his government vulnerable in this election because his rivals have tapped into regionally organized and funded campaigns that give weight to those parochial provincial political ambitions over the interests of Canada, and Canadians as a whole.

May’s opposition to the Trans Mountain Pipeline has caused friction with Singh in British Columbia as they struggle to demonstrate to a segment of BC urban and Vancouver Island voters just who is more “green”
 
(L to R) Elizabeth May, Andrew Scheer, and Jagmeet Singh
Singh’s discomfort during the federal English leader’s debate was palpable when faced with the obvious contradiction of his passion to protect minority rights in every province except Quebec.

And Andrew Scheer has been unabashed in his stumping with Conservative Premiers to gain provincial electoral favour in a combined effort against a national carbon tax that is critical to the ongoing effort to meet national carbon emission targets.

If we are to believe the public opinion poll projections, this is a very close election. Pundits tweet, post and speak on TV to a variety of possible scenarios that may result from the October 21st vote.

When I look at the mess over a looming Brexit crisis in Britain today, or witness the farce that passes as American Federal politics, my faith in the wisdom of voters is severely tested.

Canada is one of the most stable, well governed countries in the world. So, let’s NOT do a Joni Mitchell… “you don’t know what you’ve got ‘til it’s gone”.


Gordon Wilson is a writer and business consultant who served as an elected MLA from 1991 -2001.  During that time, he held several cabinet posts including Minister of Forests, Aboriginal Affairs and Minister of Finance. He has consulted widely matters pertaining to the Canadian resource economy, and the Canadian Constitution. He currently lives on a small sheep farm in Powell River.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...

Labels

Show more