Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

GORDON WILSON – Trudeau’s been the main target of his rivals, May, Singh and Scheer, who have been relentless and personal in their efforts to point out this man’s imperfections


There is only one outcome in this federal election that makes any sense to me and that is to restore a majority Liberal government in Ottawa.

Why?

Because Canada will only survive as a nation if we recognize that this country, Canada, is greater than the sum of its parts.


The practice of politics and the electoral process has vastly improved as more progressive social values shape our selection dynamic.

And yet, this election campaign has been centered around issues that cater to limited special interest groups, provincial premiers and, in the largest urban centers, an attitude of “what’s in it for me?”.

This is unfortunate, because we have a broad cross-section of Canadian society represented by many really talented candidates who have stepped forward seeking the honour of elected office.

I am sure that most are sincere in their appeal for your vote.

But in their effort to gain that coveted seat in Parliament, you should push back when they say that they want to represent “your interests” in Ottawa.

A strong Canadian nation governed by its Constitution, and protective of individual rights and freedoms as spelled out in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, advances and protects all our interests.

What exactly are those interests?


The right of a federal government to implement national programs that advance the interests of all Canadians and is not held hostage by pugnacious provincial authorities, foreign-funded interest groups, and a minority populace of hyphenated Canadians who somehow think their special interests should get priority when demanding government attention, and that the state and the tax payers who support it, owes them whatever it is they deem they need.

Elizabeth May and the Greens, suggest that their particular response to the climate crisis represents your interest.

May would have us believe that a fundamental restructuring of our national economy which will, in the short term at least, result in the loss of hundreds of thousands of high paying jobs, is in your interest because new, as yet unspecified, jobs will result from the “single greatest economic opportunity of our time”; the climate crisis.

Jagmeet Singh, performed well in the national debates and comes across as a personable fellow who cares greatly for every Canadian and who is going to “work for you”... that is, provided you don’t mind him spending massive deficits, doubling the national debt and provided you support his planned assault on the earned wealth of high-income Canadians from whom he plans to take money to give to “Canadians who need it”.

When Singh smiles into the television camera and says I am going to be working for you, he isn’t talking to Canadians who earn more that $100,000 per year.

And when he suggests that he will permit the premiers veto power over national projects and give them ability to protect provincial statues that deny minority rights, he isn’t speaking to those Canadians who believe in a strong constitutionally founded national government that has a broader interest than those exhibited by parochial provincial politicians.

Andrew Scheer’s solution to almost every problem is to get rid of Justin Trudeau, leaving us to our imagination as to what exactly he would do for Canada should he be given a mandate to succeed him.

To be sure, Scheer has brought forward a number of policy initiatives that reinstates a fairly substantial part of the economic and tax programs of past Prime Minister Stephen Harper, which is odd considering Canadians so soundly rejected those initiatives four years ago.

And so, we come to, Justin Trudeau.

As the incumbent, Trudeau has been the main target of his rivals, May, Singh and Scheer, who have been relentless and personal in their efforts to point out this man’s imperfections.

What makes Trudeau stand out from the others in this election is his steadfast commitment to Canada as a strong federal state.

In the English Leader’s debate, he was the only person on stage to take on Bloc leader Yves-François Blanchet, by defending Quebecers as Canadians and was the only leader to clearly state his opposition to and potential action against Bill 21 which strips minority rights in that province.

Trudeau is also the only leader who has stepped forward with concrete action to build infrastructure that will allow Canadian product to reach Asian markets and thus remove the strangle hold the Americans currently have on our raw materials.

Ironically, standing up for Canadian interests and defending Canadian values might have made his government vulnerable in this election because his rivals have tapped into regionally organized and funded campaigns that give weight to those parochial provincial political ambitions over the interests of Canada, and Canadians as a whole.

May’s opposition to the Trans Mountain Pipeline has caused friction with Singh in British Columbia as they struggle to demonstrate to a segment of BC urban and Vancouver Island voters just who is more “green”
 
(L to R) Elizabeth May, Andrew Scheer, and Jagmeet Singh
Singh’s discomfort during the federal English leader’s debate was palpable when faced with the obvious contradiction of his passion to protect minority rights in every province except Quebec.

And Andrew Scheer has been unabashed in his stumping with Conservative Premiers to gain provincial electoral favour in a combined effort against a national carbon tax that is critical to the ongoing effort to meet national carbon emission targets.

If we are to believe the public opinion poll projections, this is a very close election. Pundits tweet, post and speak on TV to a variety of possible scenarios that may result from the October 21st vote.

When I look at the mess over a looming Brexit crisis in Britain today, or witness the farce that passes as American Federal politics, my faith in the wisdom of voters is severely tested.

Canada is one of the most stable, well governed countries in the world. So, let’s NOT do a Joni Mitchell… “you don’t know what you’ve got ‘til it’s gone”.


Gordon Wilson is a writer and business consultant who served as an elected MLA from 1991 -2001.  During that time, he held several cabinet posts including Minister of Forests, Aboriginal Affairs and Minister of Finance. He has consulted widely matters pertaining to the Canadian resource economy, and the Canadian Constitution. He currently lives on a small sheep farm in Powell River.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Budget 2027: After a Decade of Decline, NDP Budget Delivers an Assault on Seniors, Working Families, and Small Businesses

Peter Milobar, BC Conservative Finance Critic, condemned the NDP government’s latest budget as the result of a decade of decline that has left British Columbians broke, unsafe, and paying more for less.   “After ten years of NDP mismanagement, this budget is an assault on seniors, working families, and the small businesses that drive our economy,” said Milobar. “The NDP have turned their back on the people working hardest to make ends meet and the seniors who built this province.” Milobar pointed to a new $1.1 billion annual income tax increase and warned that the government is piling new costs onto households already struggling with affordability.   “This government keeps asking British Columbians for more, while delivering less,” Milobar said. “The question people are asking is simple: Where has all the money gone?” Milobar noted that BC has gone from a surplus in the first year of NDP government to a projected deficit of more than $13 billion this year, while prov...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

FORSETH -- Before anyone gets excited about one poll showing a candidate with a 25 percent lead, and 44 percent support overall, let’s give it a few more weeks

Is this based in reality -- how accurate are the numbers? In the past couple of weeks a couple of candidates, for the leadership of the BC Conservative Party, have been presenting polling results that they lead the pack – one even going so far as to say they have a lock on 44% of those who will be voting, and a twenty-five percent lead over the individual ranked second. I am going to say that this one, from Kerry-Lynne Findlay, is highly suspect. First of all the company conducting the poll, ERG National Research, is not a Member of Industry Bodies (the Canadian Research Insights Council), meaning they do not adhere to established industry standards for research, such as transparency, privacy, and methodological rigor. AI Overview states that ... based on alerts from the Canadian Research Insights Council (CRIC) and reports, ERG National Research should be treated with extreme caution regarding its reliability, and legitimacy, in conducting political polling. Before I even read this in...

Labels

Show more