Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ADAM OLSEN -- There is nothing sacred about the five-day work week. Indeed, before the Great Depression people worked five and a half or six days per week

The COVID-19 global pandemic has disrupted all aspects of our lives.

During the upheaval our strengths and weaknesses, opportunities and threats have been exposed. We can either strive to put the pieces back together exactly as they were before the disruption, or we can thoughtfully and critically make changes that benefit people and the planet.

Last week New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern floated the idea of a four-day work week for her country. My colleague Sonia Furstenau raised the issue in an interview while discussing the economic recovery and potential changes that could be made in our province.

COVID-19 has changed many aspects of our society. My constituency and legislative offices are shuttered and I and my staff have been working from home for weeks now. While aspects of the situation are not ideal there are some benefits as well.

More people are working from home. Tech firms such as the Canadian giant Shopify are adapting their workplace to allow their employees to continue to work from home if they wish.

It’s not just where people are working that has changed. Our start and finishing times are evolving to accommodate the other aspects of life that need our attention. For example, our family is challenged daily with balancing work demands with our children’s education.


400,000 British Columbians lost their jobs in March and April. It is impossible to know how many more will be impacted in May and the upcoming summer months. With such devastation in our society and economy it is important that our recovery creates more resilience and stability for people and families to create a healthy life in our province and country.

That is what I am focused on.

I honour the deeply challenging times many British Columbians are facing. How people are going to pay the bills is certainly top-of-mind, but people are also concerned with how they can work from home, educate their children and balance all the other complications that have become much more prominent in the past few weeks.

Employers are trying to figure out how they best utilize space for their employees while maintaining government orders and restrictions on creating safe workplaces for British Columbians.

None of this is easy and must be addressed with a commitment to be thoughtful and compassionate in the ideas and policy initiatives that we put forward.

With that in mind it is important that we are flexible and agile in our approach.


There is nothing sacred about the five-day work week. Indeed, before the Great Depression people worked five and a half or six days per week.

In the last election I and my BC Green Caucus colleagues ran on a platform of innovation. Innovation is not just how or where we make widgets, it’s about:

  • How we train and deploy a workforce to be flexible, adaptable and resilient
  • Where and when they work
  • How products are designed and manufactured
  • How services and experiences are delivered ... and ...
  • How all of these considerations impact how human resources are deployed

There are many questions about how, where and for how long we work.


The provincial government has an opportunity to facilitate these discussions and not shut them down unnecessarily. We have been hearing from stakeholders in many sectors that they are interested in exploring ideas and looking at ways they could be implemented.

It would be a great tragedy of this time if our response to this difficulty is to shut down conversation and just embrace the status quo.


There is a lot more work to be done on this idea. For it to be successful in British Columbia it must be informed and shaped by all the stakeholders including the business community, organized labour and workers. I’m excited that we opened this conversation in our province and encouraged by the responses we have received so far.


I would like your feedback.


What do you think about a 4-day work week? Would it be an option that you would like? What are some of the benefits you can see and what are some concerns that you have about this policy? Send me an email, and leave a comment.


To learn more, check out the article “Where Did The Five-Day Work Week Come From” in The Atlantic

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more