Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

WorkSafeBC says they are committed to sound financial management, meantime Liberal leader Andrew Wilkinson wants to know what happened to the 2.9-BILLION-dollar surplus


For those who missed the story, released by WorkSafe BC yesterday, it seems they are expecting a substantial financial loss-- just how much however, is the question many are asking.

While WorkSafeBC says they are ... committed to sound financial management in order to ensure the long-term financial sustainability of the system for workers and employers, the BC Liberals are asking BC Labour Minister Harry Bains how the NDP government has ... lost almost the entire estimated $2.9-billion surplus from WorkSafeBC in just the last few weeks.

So, is there a sound financial footing for WorkSafeBC – or is it facing financial instability?

The statement, released from WorkSafeBC over the weekend, stated that indeed the COVID-19 situation has resulted in a lot of economic uncertainty. However, to increase financial stability (and avoid rate volatility during economic and investment downturns) they retain what they call a ... reasonable level of assets over liabilities.

Further, the release stated, “Currently, WorkSafeBC continues to exceed its target funding level, despite the volatility”.

Liberal leader Andrew Wilkinson however is calling on John Horgan’s NDP government to tell British Columbians what happened to that $2.9 billion surplus.

"People all across BC have been sacrificing to help stop the spread of COVID-19 and now as they head back to work, they're learning that the agency in charge of ensuring they're safe doesn't even have enough money to help buy gloves or masks”, said Wilkinson, who then continued:

"This is unacceptable at the best of times, but as people return to work and help rebuild our economy, the timing of this failure couldn't be worse."

Currently, for the purposes of contingency planning, WorkSafeBC’s actuaries are considering multiple possible scenarios (financial needs and risks), based on what they are call ... widely varying economic forecasts.

Again, according to WorkSafeBC, their long-term planning, including the setting of assessment rates, is based on a smoothed approach to financial valuation and projection.

That ‘smoothed approach’ apparently means that ... significant investment gains or losses are generally taken into account over a period of years, rather than having the immediate impact that the fair value financial statements might suggest.

Still, a 2.9-billion-dollar loss, impacts the Liberal’s suggestion that WorkSafe BC's surplus be used help small business owners with the cost of personal protective equipment (PPE), so they can keep their employees and customers safe.

“We now know why the NDP rejected this idea - they lost the surplus”, said Wilkinson.

"The people of BC, and especially the people who paid premiums to WorkSafe, are entitled to know who lost $3 billion in a matter of weeks," added Wilkinson. "Where is the accountability? The NDP need to answer for this immediately."

Who’s right ... how much money has been lost ... is it a loss that fits with possible financial scenarios planned for by WorkSafeBC ... and will it impact workers relying on WorkSafeBC?

As Rick Riccardo would say when Lucy would screw something up ... “You got some splainin to do”



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 
Post a Comment
Read more

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more