Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

WorkSafeBC says they are committed to sound financial management, meantime Liberal leader Andrew Wilkinson wants to know what happened to the 2.9-BILLION-dollar surplus


For those who missed the story, released by WorkSafe BC yesterday, it seems they are expecting a substantial financial loss-- just how much however, is the question many are asking.

While WorkSafeBC says they are ... committed to sound financial management in order to ensure the long-term financial sustainability of the system for workers and employers, the BC Liberals are asking BC Labour Minister Harry Bains how the NDP government has ...
lost almost the entire estimated $2.9-billion surplus from WorkSafeBC in just the last few weeks.

So, is there a sound financial footing for WorkSafeBC – or is it facing financial instability?

The statement, released from WorkSafeBC over the weekend, stated that indeed the COVID-19 situation has resulted in a lot of economic uncertainty. However, to increase financial stability (and avoid rate volatility during economic and investment downturns) they retain what they call a ... reasonable level of assets over liabilities.

Further, the release stated, “Currently, WorkSafeBC continues to exceed its target funding level, despite the volatility”.

Liberal leader Andrew Wilkinson however is
calling on John Horgan’s NDP government to tell British Columbians what happened to that $2.9 billion surplus.

"People all across BC have been sacrificing to help stop the spread of COVID-19 and now as they head back to work, they're learning that the agency in charge of ensuring they're safe doesn't even have enough money to help buy gloves or masks”, said Wilkinson, who then continued:

"This is unacceptable at the best of times, but as people return to work and help rebuild our economy, the timing of this failure couldn't be worse."

Currently, for the purposes of contingency planning, WorkSafeBC’s actuaries are considering multiple possible scenarios (financial needs and risks), based on what they are call ... widely varying economic forecasts.

Again, according to WorkSafeBC, their long-term planning, including the setting of assessment rates, is based on a smoothed approach to financial valuation and projection.

That ‘smoothed approach’ apparently means that ... significant investment gains or losses are generally taken into account over a period of years, rather than having the immediate impact that the fair value financial statements might suggest.

Still, a 2.9-billion-dollar loss, impacts the Liberal’s suggestion that
WorkSafe BC's surplus be used help small business owners with the cost of personal protective equipment (PPE), so they can keep their employees and customers safe.

We now know why the NDP rejected this idea - they lost the surplus”, said Wilkinson.

"The people of BC, and especially the people who paid premiums to WorkSafe, are entitled to know who lost $3 billion in a matter of weeks," added Wilkinson. "Where is the accountability? The NDP need to answer for this immediately."

Who’s right ... how much money has been lost ... is it a loss that fits with possible financial scenarios planned for by WorkSafeBC ... and will it impact workers relying on WorkSafeBC?

As Rick Riccardo would say when Lucy would screw something up ... “You got some splainin to do



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

GORDON F. D. WILSON: When The Trick Masquerades as The Treat

Thirty-seven years ago, Halloween 1987, I became the leader of the BC Liberal Party.   British Columbia was badly polarized. Social Credit held one side and the NDP the other. It had been twelve years, 1975, since Liberal MLAs Garde Gardom, Pat McGeer, and Alan Williams had walked away from their party to join Social Credit, one year after the lone Progressive Conservative MLA Hugh Curtis had abandoned his party to sit with Bill Bennett, the son and heir apparent to long-serving BC Premier, WAC Bennett.   An unwritten agreement by the biggest Canadian political shareholders, the federal Liberals and Conservatives, decided that if British Columbia was to remain a lucrative franchise from a revenue perspective, they couldn’t risk splitting the electoral vote and electing the real enemy, the NDP, so no resources would be used to finance either a Liberal or Conservative party provincially.   “There are two sides to every street,” I was told by a very prominent Canadian businessman who cont

FORSETH: As a BC Conservative member, and campaign worker, I will again state that the fact these errors were found -- AND brought to light BY Elections BC -- shows the system IS working

Sadly, two and a half weeks after the BC provincial election campaign, those who want to undermine our political process are still at.  PLUS, we also have one who doesn’t even live in our country, never mind our province. I speak of the buffoon running for President of the United States, who has poisoned the well when it comes to faith in the electoral process. Just today alone, comments such as the following, were being made of posts that I shared online: ... all the votes they keep finding has just favoured NDP on in all critical ridings and soon they will flip another riding in favour of NDP, Come on. ... Elections BC has ridiculed British Columbians, and I no longer have confidence or trust in their process and competence regarding the results Then there are others online, with comments like these – who are claiming fraud in the October 19th election: ... Who is the oversight for Elections BC? They should be investigated for election fraud! ... Fraudulent election ... should be red

Rob Shaw: Eby should be worried why mudslinging missed the mark in B.C. election

  Why did a BC NDP election campaign overwhelmingly focused on attacking the character of the BC Conservatives fail to prevent a blue wave that came within 27 votes of toppling the governing party? Partly because voters didn’t much care for, or about, all the New Democrat mudslinging. They were just hopping mad about some very specific issues ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more