Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FORSETH: (some) Politicians will do anything to engender reliance on their bountiful spending -- for everything wished for – but not necessarily needed

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and
Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland

Today, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland held their eleventh call with premiers to discuss the evolving COVID-19 situation.

The lead
ers discussed the collaborative efforts by federal, provincial, and territorial partners to combat the pandemic and protect the health, safety, and economic well-being of all Canadians.

I wonder however, when the talk came to the ‘economic well-being of all Canadians’, how much time was devoted to that topic.

Billions and billions of dollars have been made available, to workers, to renters, to health care workers, to small businesses, to students, to seniors, and to large corporations.

BC Hydro has a relief fund ... there’s a freeze on rental rates ... there’s low income wage top-ups ... increased child support benefits ... it’s a jumble of Scrabble tiles spelling a multitude of acronyms, of which the following are just a few.

  • C.E.C.R.A. -- Canada Emergency Commercial Rental Assistance
  • C.E.R.B. -- the Canadian Emergency Response Benefit
  • C.E.S.B. -- the Canada Emergency Student Benefit
  • C.E.B.A -- the Canada Emergency Business Account
  • C.E.W.S. -- the Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy
  • B.C.T.R.S. – the BC Temporary Rental Supplement
  • B.C.E.B.W. – the BC Emergency Benefit for Workers
  • C.S.S.G. -- the Canada Student Service Grant

And as I noted in a commentary the other day – even political parties both federally – and here in BC -- have had a share in government

largesse.

Has much of this money been necessary to prevent an economic collapse?  In large part, I believe so, however I’m beginning to have concerns.

‘Some’ receiving rent subsidies aren’t paying rent – ‘some’ drugs users are receiving a windfall of money never seen before (and sadly overdose deaths are increasing due to a never ending fentanyl laced supply of drugs) – ‘some’ are receiving the emergency wage benefit who have no interest in working – there are over-lapping programs – and the list goes on.

Talking with one of my political friends, this morning, they said to me:

It’s scary to think about who is going to pay for the socialist programs being rolled out by the feds and our great NDP friends here in BC. It’s not good.”

They went on to say, “People do need help -- but there needs to be a transparent and parallel economic strategy -- and neither the feds or the province (of BC) are offering nothing in this regard”.

It's become scary, at least for me, to read and hear about the daily never-ending smorgasbord buffet of goodies being handed out.

People need help, but it seems like there are very few (none?) checks and balances in place regarding actual need. And that makes me fear for the future of my adult children – and for their children – who will be left to pick up the tab.

And perhaps even further down the road.

I fear this burden will extend into great grandkids time”, said my friend.

Governments want the people to love and appreciate them – and ‘some’ politicians will do anything to engender reliance on their bountiful spending for everything wished for – but often times not necessarily needed.

People do need help, but it is incumbent on governments to at least have a recovery plan that is more than just handing out more money.

That’s why it’s time to put the brakes on the spending announcements, and for sane heads to review programs and spending already in place ... because governments, unfortunately, can’t always be relied on to do it themselves.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...

Labels

Show more