Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

‘I have heard it rumoured that some parties are wanting the per vote subsidy back -- I have nothing concrete nor proof’



Two days ago, I received an email from the Canadian Taxpayers Federation (CTF), which read in part ...

...you’ll never guess who politicians are thinking about bailing out next. Themselves
 
The email went on to state:

... The same political parties that already get a big taxpayer subsidy in the form of tax credit of up to 75 per cent! It’s outrageous – and it’s an idea that needs to be stopped dead in its tracks ...

... let them know that political parties shouldn’t get a special bailout while millions of Canadians are taking pay cuts and losing their jobs ... when MPs get an earful from thousands of Canadians, they’re likely to think twice about this terrible idea ...

For those not aware it was the Conservative government, of Stephen Harper, that ended the per vote subsidy, and rightly so.  And which parties were opposed?  The Liberals, the New Democrats, the Bloc, and the Green Party.

The CTF’s email was very much non-specific as to which parties were pushing to have this happen, leaving one to believe that perhaps all of them were in on it.

Was that indeed true, I wondered, because I had not seen anything in the media to indicate this was being considered?  If the information in the CTF email is indeed accurate, I (along with many other Canadians) will be infuriated.

I provided a copy of the email, from the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, to Kamloops Thompson Cariboo Conservative MP Cathy McLeod; her response?

I have heard it rumoured that some parties are wanting the per vote subsidy back”.  She went on to clarify that however by continuing, “I have nothing concrete nor proof”.

McLeod went on to state, “Conservatives never supported the subsidy, and as you know ended it a number of years ago”.

IF ... the Liberals, NDP, Bloc, and Green Party are indeed trying to have the taxpayer funded ‘per-vote-subsidy’ reinstated ... then indeed they should get an earful from us.

Because, as Ms. McLeod reiterated in her response to me, “As you note, Canadians would be outraged”.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...

Labels

Show more