Decision to defer stumpage is a good one, however BC Liberal forestry critic John Rustad is asking why government is charging an undefined interest rate, when other jurisdictions are not
BC Liberal Forestry Critic John Rustad |
While the provincial government in BC has
announced it will be deferring stumpage fees it charges forest companies, in
the midst of COVID-19 crisis, the former BC Liberal Minister for Forests, and
now Opposition Critic, has expressed several concerns.
John Rustad, MLA for the
riding of Nechako Lakes, stated, “Forest companies were,
and are, asking for help. Big steps are needed to reduce costs”.
Continuing, he observed,
“BC has become the highest cost producer in North America
under the NDP and unless the cost structure is addressed, the future of
forestry in BC will be very challenging”.
Still, and according to BC Premier John
Horgan;
“As government, we had already taken a
number of steps to help forest communities and the industry because they were
facing tough times even before the COVID-19 crisis came along.”
“Now, we’re deferring stumpage fees (with
interest) so companies can maintain their financial liquidity, which will
not only benefit them, but ideally, forest workers and communities as well.”
Elsewhere
however?
Although
the Opposition Critic says the move to defer stumpage (as have Alberta and
Ontario) is a good one, Rustad is asking why BC has insisted on charging
interest (not even a defined rate) when the other jurisdictions did not?
“And
why only 3 months during spring breakup and not the six months that Alberta and
Ontario have done?”
According to a statement
yesterday, from the provincial government, the deferral will leave eligible
companies with an estimated $80 million. This is being done so they can pay
employees, pay contractors and pay other bills needed to keep their doors open
or reopen them faster.
Loaded logging truck headed to the sawmill |
“We’re building on
other measures we’ve taken to help the forest sector navigate this crisis,”
said Doug Donaldson, Minister of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations
and Rural Development.
“What we’re
announcing may allow some companies to get back online sooner rather than later
when we get through the situation we’re in now – or it may save other companies
from having to shut down altogether.”
However,
according to Rustad, while this will provide some cash flow help for companies,
it does not address the fundamental problem of overall costs.
This
led the Forestry Critic to conclude, “A strong forest sector needs to be
competitive and deserves a government that actually cares about the workers,
families and communities that depend on forestry”.
Comments
Post a Comment