Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Decision to defer stumpage is a good one, however BC Liberal forestry critic John Rustad is asking why government is charging an undefined interest rate, when other jurisdictions are not

BC Liberal Forestry Critic John Rustad

While the provincial government in BC has announced it will be deferring stumpage fees it charges forest companies, in the midst of COVID-19 crisis, the former BC Liberal Minister for Forests, and now Opposition Critic, has expressed several concerns.

John Rustad, MLA for the riding of Nechako Lakes, stated, “Forest companies were, and are, asking for help. Big steps are needed to reduce costs”.

Continuing, he observed, “BC has become the highest cost producer in North America under the NDP and unless the cost structure is addressed, the future of forestry in BC will be very challenging”.

Still, and according to BC Premier John Horgan;

As government, we had already taken a number of steps to help forest communities and the industry because they were facing tough times even before the COVID-19 crisis came along.”

Now, we’re deferring stumpage fees (with interest) so companies can maintain their financial liquidity, which will not only benefit them, but ideally, forest workers and communities as well.”

Elsewhere however?

Although the Opposition Critic says the move to defer stumpage (as have Alberta and Ontario) is a good one, Rustad is asking why BC has insisted on charging interest (not even a defined rate) when the other jurisdictions did not?

And why only 3 months during spring breakup and not the six months that Alberta and Ontario have done?

According to a statement yesterday, from the provincial government, the deferral will leave eligible companies with an estimated $80 million. This is being done so they can pay employees, pay contractors and pay other bills needed to keep their doors open or reopen them faster.

Loaded logging truck headed to the sawmill

We’re building on other measures we’ve taken to help the forest sector navigate this crisis,” said Doug Donaldson, Minister of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations and Rural Development.

What we’re announcing may allow some companies to get back online sooner rather than later when we get through the situation we’re in now – or it may save other companies from having to shut down altogether.”

However, according to Rustad, while this will provide some cash flow help for companies, it does not address the fundamental problem of overall costs.

This led the Forestry Critic to conclude, “A strong forest sector needs to be competitive and deserves a government that actually cares about the workers, families and communities that depend on forestry”.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more