Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

JOHN FELDSTED -- Trudeau continues to believe in UN multilateral institutions, but most Canadians do not

Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director General of the WHO


HUFFPOST (May 19th, 2020) -- Canada Will ‘Continue to Support’ WHO Despite Trump Pressure, Trudeau Says. The U.S. president is threatening to permanently cut funding to the U.N. agency.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says Canada will “continue to support” the World Health Organization (WHO) as the agency again finds itself in the crosshairs of U.S. President Donald Trump over its handling of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Speaking to reporters in Ottawa Tuesday, Trudeau was asked to respond to Trump’s threat, issued in an open letter to WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus and posted online Monday, to permanently cut U.S. funding to WHO unless the agency commits to “substantive improvements” in the next 30 days...


-------------------------------------------------

What U.S. President Trump does is not relevant to our analysis of the World Health Organization (WHO). Our support has to be based on cost balanced against value.

Why would Canada continue to support the UN World Health Organization? The WHO has done nothing to alleviate or mitigate coronavirus spread and suffering. In late January, February and early March, the WHO was advising against banning international travel despite knowing the virus was spread by infected travellers.

In mid March, the WHO advised that coronavirus was a pandemic.

Most of the civilized world was aware of that weeks earlier.

Then we were advised to self-isolate and distance from others.

Now the WHO wants us to test, test, test, test. Why? These fools are going on about a “second wave” of infections when the first wave fizzled. Infections came nowhere close to “best case” predictions.

Trudeau continues to believe in UN multilateral institutions, but most Canadians do not. We need to choose our friends carefully. Only about 12% of the UN members are true democracies. Another 20% are hybrids. The remaining 68% want us to sharply increase our foreign aid.

We should be generous to those who have less, based on two conditions.

First, our economy must be robust and our public debt low. Charity begins at home. We take care of our own first.

Second, our foreign aid must reach the people it is intended for. Nations where foreign aid falls into the hands of government officials or bandits (who may be the same people) are off limits. Our fishes are for the people, not for the sharks who control them.

You may recall that very recently US President Trump tried to block the 3M company (owned by China) from filling Canadian orders for medical masks although the pulp used to make the masks comes from Canada. That, in a nutshell, is the value of multilateral institutions. They are mostly a venue for world leaders to gather and hobnob at public expense but useless in a crisis.

The current virus crisis has shown us that borders will slam shut, our freedoms will be ignored and even within Canada, different jurisdictions isolate and compete.

The spirits of collaboration and cooperation in the face of a common enemy are hanging from a lamp post, twisting in the wind. The veneer of civilization is thin, fragile, and easily shattered in the face of a threat.


John Feldsted ... is a political commentator, consultant, and strategist.  He makes his home in Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more