Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

JOHN FELDSTED -- Trudeau continues to believe in UN multilateral institutions, but most Canadians do not

Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director General of the WHO


HUFFPOST (May 19th, 2020) -- Canada Will ‘Continue to Support’ WHO Despite Trump Pressure, Trudeau Says. The U.S. president is threatening to permanently cut funding to the U.N. agency.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says Canada will “continue to support” the World Health Organization (WHO) as the agency again finds itself in the crosshairs of U.S. President Donald Trump over its handling of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Speaking to reporters in Ottawa Tuesday, Trudeau was asked to respond to Trump’s threat, issued in an open letter to WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus and posted online Monday, to permanently cut U.S. funding to WHO unless the agency commits to “substantive improvements” in the next 30 days...

 -------------------------------------------------

What U.S. President Trump does is not relevant to our analysis of the World Health Organization (WHO). Our support has to be based on cost balanced against value.

Why would Canada continue to support the UN World Health Organization? The WHO has done nothing to alleviate or mitigate coronavirus spread and suffering. In late January, February and early March, the WHO was advising against banning international travel despite knowing the virus was spread by infected travellers.

In mid March, the WHO advised that coronavirus was a pandemic.

Most of the civilized world was aware of that weeks earlier.

Then we were advised to self-isolate and distance from others.

Now the WHO wants us to test, test, test, test. Why? These fools are going on about a “second wave” of infections when the first wave fizzled. Infections came nowhere close to “best case” predictions.

Trudeau continues to believe in UN multilateral institutions, but most Canadians do not. We need to choose our friends carefully. Only about 12% of the UN members are true democracies. Another 20% are hybrids. The remaining 68% want us to sharply increase our foreign aid.

We should be generous to those who have less, based on two conditions.

First, our economy must be robust and our public debt low. Charity begins at home. We take care of our own first.

Second, our foreign aid must reach the people it is intended for. Nations where foreign aid falls into the hands of government officials or bandits (who may be the same people) are off limits. Our fishes are for the people, not for the sharks who control them.

You may recall that very recently US President Trump tried to block the 3M company (owned by China) from filling Canadian orders for medical masks although the pulp used to make the masks comes from Canada. That, in a nutshell, is the value of multilateral institutions. They are mostly a venue for world leaders to gather and hobnob at public expense but useless in a crisis.

The current virus crisis has shown us that borders will slam shut, our freedoms will be ignored and even within Canada, different jurisdictions isolate and compete.

The spirits of collaboration and cooperation in the face of a common enemy are hanging from a lamp post, twisting in the wind. The veneer of civilization is thin, fragile, and easily shattered in the face of a threat.

John Feldsted ... is a political commentator, consultant, and strategist.  He makes his home in Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more