Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

PECKFORD -- And now another $850 million to international organizations — for research. What Organizations? Oh, we do not know

 

Another $850 million out the Door — and out of Canada!

 

Do you get the idea that we have some mysterious pit of unlimited supply of money?

 

Do you get the idea that we like funding outside of Canada, as much as we do inside of Canada?

 

Do you get the idea that our Federal Government forgets that 5 million Canadians do not have a family doctor ... that our wait times for surgery are among the most in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) ... and that the time of getting an appointment with a specialist is one the highest in the OECD?

 

Do you remember the Paris Environmental Conference? That’s the one where we fell all over ourselves committing your money -- in the hundreds of millions of dollars -- to an agreement that is scientifically questionable and voluntary, and excludes India and China ... the two most populous nations on earth?

 

And now another $850 million to international organizations — for research.

 

What Organizations? Oh! We do not know.

 

The CTV report says: ‘The funding will be provided to several global health organizations.’

 

Thanks —-$850 million, and all we get from one of our leading news organizations is that the money is going to ‘several global health organizations’.

 

Holy smoke!!

 

And this news report also says:

This (recent past funding) has included funding to Canadian life sciences companies and to the World Health Organization’s (WHO) treatment trials, as well as creating “strategies to tackle misinformation, stigma, and fear,” according to a government statement.’

 

What does that mean?

 

We are still sending money to the WHO even though their legitimacy is in question? And we may be funding disinformation campaigns against who exactly?

 

Whose side are we on anyway?

 

Our largest trading partner, without whom we would be in economic / financial trouble big time, and who we would have to depend on in an armed conflict ... or an undemocratic Communist state, that makes people disappear and who are trying to hide the origin of the Wuhan virus?

 

What is going on in this country? And we still are trying to decide if we will adopt 5G from China?

 

This just does not add up!

 

Is someone going to sound the alarm?

 

In 1972 Brian Peckford was first elected, as a Progressive Conservative, to the Newfoundland Labrador House of Assembly. He became Premier at the age of 36, and held the leadership of his party and government from 1979 to 1989.

Since leaving politics, early in 1989, Peckford has conducted public inquires for the governments of British Columbia and Canada, has served on numerous Boards including the CBC, and has been active in public affairs.  

He and his wife Carol have made British Columbia their home, since 1993. They now live in Parksville, on Vancouver Island. He blogs at
Peckford 42.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...

Labels

Show more