Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED -- Just because someone deals cards . . . . . . does not mean we are obliged to play poker

In every general election, political parties deal the cards. They want to control the debate -- and discussions -- that lead to a decision on who we should vote for.

Issues we consider important or vital are not addressed. Our questions are evaded rather than addressed.

Every candidate is armed with a list of “talking points” that he or she sticks to. No candidate talks to their constituents to find out their concerns are so they can best represent the district in Parliament. They do not do so because they must follow the “party line” in all situations no matter what they personally think or what their constituents might think or want.

They represent the political party they are affiliated with, not the people who elected them.

In recent years, we have seen just how arbitrary, corrosive, and mean-minded political party disciple is.

We have seen elected representatives kicked out of the party for failing to follow party dictum's. Elected members accused of harassment of sexual misconduct are turfed out of a caucus without any examination of fact or impartial hearings. Elected members are ostracized for making comments the party feel will reflect badly on it.

We are not represented by the people we elect, as they have been enslaved by the political party they are affiliated with. Our government is run by political party officials who tell elected members what they may and may not say on parliament and public, which issues to support, and which to avoid.

Like it or not, we have a parliament of eunuchs.

Party leaders, including the Prime Minister, are puppets on a string held by party officials who have the ultimate power - control over party funds. The PMO has a huge staff of expensive specialists to ensure the Prime Minister does not go off script and harm re-election chances. Who is paying for them? It is not the party.

During every general election, parties spend large amounts of money ensuring that all candidates and local officials are thoroughly versed in the ‘party line’ -- and warned not go off script, which can lead to unwanted media attention and controversy.

The guaranteed freedoms of candidates and local officers, in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, are stifled.

Once the election is over, party MPs are still required to follow the script drafted by party officials. Failure to do so is the end of a political career. The ultimate prize in a federal election is to have the party leader appointed Prime Minister. Our Prime Minister is appointed ... not elected.

Those of us who support a political party, and will vote for the local candidate without question, are being hoodwinked. The party we vote for is stifling local representation which is unconstitutional and undemocratic.

Even MPs, who are members of the party forming government, are tightly controlled.

They may not put a private member’s Bill before parliament without prior party approval. As Bills are presented, debated, and voted on, party officials decide which MPs will be allowed to participate in debates and how they will vote.

It is depressing when we stand back to consider what is really going on. It is certainly not what we were taught in school or what is portrayed in student parliaments. We need to get back to unfettered democratic representation of the people who pay the bills.

Political party officials are not going to give up the powers they have accumulated willingly. They will fight us tooth and nail with our donations ... and the public subsidies they receive.

We are going to have to fight to get our voices heard in our Parliament. Their arrogant treatment of us during the coronavirus crisis is fair warning that we are going to have to fight to regain the democracy we thought we had.


John Feldsted ... is a political commentator, consultant, and strategist. He makes his home in Winnipeg, Manitoba.

 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...
Post a Comment
Read more

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...
Post a Comment
Read more

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more