Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED -- Just because someone deals cards . . . . . . does not mean we are obliged to play poker

In every general election, political parties deal the cards. They want to control the debate -- and discussions -- that lead to a decision on who we should vote for.

Issues we consider important or vital are not addressed. Our questions are evaded rather than addressed.

Every candidate is armed with a list of “talking points” that he or she sticks to. No candidate talks to their constituents to find out their concerns are so they can best represent the district in Parliament. They do not do so because they must follow the “party line” in all situations no matter what they personally think or what their constituents might think or want.

They represent the political party they are affiliated with, not the people who elected them.

In recent years, we have seen just how arbitrary, corrosive, and mean-minded political party disciple is.

We have seen elected representatives kicked out of the party for failing to follow party dictum's. Elected members accused of harassment of sexual misconduct are turfed out of a caucus without any examination of fact or impartial hearings. Elected members are ostracized for making comments the party feel will reflect badly on it.

We are not represented by the people we elect, as they have been enslaved by the political party they are affiliated with. Our government is run by political party officials who tell elected members what they may and may not say on parliament and public, which issues to support, and which to avoid.

Like it or not, we have a parliament of eunuchs.

Party leaders, including the Prime Minister, are puppets on a string held by party officials who have the ultimate power - control over party funds. The PMO has a huge staff of expensive specialists to ensure the Prime Minister does not go off script and harm re-election chances. Who is paying for them? It is not the party.

During every general election, parties spend large amounts of money ensuring that all candidates and local officials are thoroughly versed in the ‘party line’ -- and warned not go off script, which can lead to unwanted media attention and controversy.

The guaranteed freedoms of candidates and local officers, in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, are stifled.

Once the election is over, party MPs are still required to follow the script drafted by party officials. Failure to do so is the end of a political career. The ultimate prize in a federal election is to have the party leader appointed Prime Minister. Our Prime Minister is appointed ... not elected.

Those of us who support a political party, and will vote for the local candidate without question, are being hoodwinked. The party we vote for is stifling local representation which is unconstitutional and undemocratic.

Even MPs, who are members of the party forming government, are tightly controlled.

They may not put a private member’s Bill before parliament without prior party approval. As Bills are presented, debated, and voted on, party officials decide which MPs will be allowed to participate in debates and how they will vote.

It is depressing when we stand back to consider what is really going on. It is certainly not what we were taught in school or what is portrayed in student parliaments. We need to get back to unfettered democratic representation of the people who pay the bills.

Political party officials are not going to give up the powers they have accumulated willingly. They will fight us tooth and nail with our donations ... and the public subsidies they receive.

We are going to have to fight to get our voices heard in our Parliament. Their arrogant treatment of us during the coronavirus crisis is fair warning that we are going to have to fight to regain the democracy we thought we had.


John Feldsted ... is a political commentator, consultant, and strategist. He makes his home in Winnipeg, Manitoba.

 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more