Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED -- Just because someone deals cards . . . . . . does not mean we are obliged to play poker

In every general election, political parties deal the cards. They want to control the debate -- and discussions -- that lead to a decision on who we should vote for.

Issues we consider important or vital are not addressed. Our questions are evaded rather than addressed.

Every candidate is armed with a list of “talking points” that he
or she sticks to. No candidate talks to their constituents to find out their concerns are so they can best represent the district in Parliament. They do not do so because they must follow the “party line” in all situations no matter what they personally think or what their constituents might think or want.

They represent the political party they are affiliated with, not the people who elected them.

In recent years, we have seen just how arbitrary, corrosive, and mean-minded political party disciple is.

We have seen elected representatives kicked out of the party for failing to follow party dictum's. Elected members accused of harassment of sexual misconduct are turfed out of a caucus without any examination of fact or impartial hearings. Elected members are ostracized for making comments the party feel will reflect badly on it.

We are not represented by the people we elect, as they have
been enslaved by the political party they are affiliated with. Our government is run by political party officials who tell elected members what they may and may not say on parliament and public, which issues to support, and which to avoid.

Like it or not, we have a parliament of eunuchs.

Party leaders, including the Prime Minister, are puppets on a string held by party officials who have the ultimate power - control over party funds. The PMO has a huge staff of expensive specialists to ensure the Prime Minister does not go off script and harm re-election chances. Who is paying for them? It is not the party.

During every general election, parties spend large amounts of money ensuring that all candidates and local officials are thoroughly versed in the ‘party line’ -- and warned not go off script, which can lead to unwanted media attention and controversy.


The guaranteed freedoms of candidates and local officers, in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, are stifled.

Once the election is over, party MPs are still required to follow the script drafted by party officials. Failure to do so is the end of a political career. The ultimate prize in a federal election is to have the party leader appointed Prime Minister. Our Prime Minister is appointed ... not elected.

Those of us who support a political party, and will vote for the local candidate without question, are being hoodwinked. The party we vote for is stifling local representation which is unconstitutional and undemocratic.


Even MPs, who are members of the party forming government, are tightly controlled.

They may not put a private member’s Bill before parliament without prior party approval. As Bills are presented, debated, and voted on, party officials decide which MPs will be allowed to participate in debates and how they will vote.

It is depressing when we stand back to consider what is really going on. It is certainly not what we were taught in school or what is portrayed in student parliaments. We need to get back to unfettered democratic representation of the people who pay the bills.

Political party officials are not going to give up the powers they have accumulated willingly. They will fight us tooth and nail with our donations ... and the public subsidies they receive.

We are going to have to fight to get our voices heard in our Parliament. Their arrogant treatment of us during the coronavirus crisis is fair warning that we are going to have to fight to regain the democracy we thought we had.



John Feldsted ... is a political commentator, consultant, and strategist. He makes his home in Winnipeg, Manitoba.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Kamloops woman’s cancer test cancelled due to Interior Health mandates for OB/GYNs (iNFO News)

A Kamloops woman’s cancer screening appointment was considered urgent by her doctors and scheduled within weeks, but it was postponed indefinitely when Interior Health ordered her gynecologist take that day’s on-call shift. Troylana Manson now waits with the mystery of whether she might have cancer amid a staffing crisis for women’s health care specialists in Kamloops. “I was happy to have that appointment in December so we could rule this out, but now it’s thrown in the air again. People in Kamloops, certainly people in positions of power, need to realize what Interior Health is doing”  ... CLICK HERE for the full story

One arrested at OneBC event at UVic that draws protesters (Times Colonist)

A would-be speaker was arrested under the Trespass Act after she arrived at the University of Victoria on Tuesday for an event intended to shed light on what the OneBC political party refers to as the “reconciliation industry.”  An officer at the scene initially said two people were arrested, after protesters scuffled with those trying to hold the unsanctioned event. Saanich police issued a statement later Tuesday saying only one person was arrested.  Police did not name the person who was arrested, but OneBC leader Dallas Brodie said it was Frances Widdowson, who was later released ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

Eby misled British Columbians about Cowichan appeal; court records show no stay was ever filed; Conservative leader John Rustad

Conservative Opposition Leader John Rustad says Premier David Eby has been caught misleading the public after court records confirmed the government never filed the stay of the Cowichan ruling the NDP repeatedly promised. “For four months, the Premier said the stay was being sought, the Attorney General claimed the application was underway, and the government told British Columbians that action was coming. The court record shows they did nothing,” said Rustad. “Not one stay, not one application, not one motion. They made promises to homeowners while the registry sat empty.” Premier Eby first promised on August 11, 2025, that a stay would be filed, then again in October, and twice in Question Period when pressured by the opposition. A review of court documents on Friday revealed that no stay has been filed. Rustad said the stay was the single legal measure that could pause the ruling and protect homeowners in Richmond and across the province while appeals move forward. By...

Labels

Show more