Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FORSETH -- It was all the stuff you’d expect to hear from the candidates – and which honestly didn’t really move me much emotionally. Maybe that’s good!

Yesterday afternoon I finally had a chance to watch the Conservative Party English debate. No change in Derek Sloan not being a choice for me.

The big change however is that Peter MacKay has dropped to #3 on my ballot, while Leslyn Lewis has moved to #2, and even making me re-thing my #1 choice. I appreciated her frank answers to questions, and while not as polished as O'Toole and MacKay, I appreciated what she had to say.

What was the worst part of the debate?? When the young boy (Max? Matt?) asked the leadership contenders to answer why the wanted to be the next Prime Minister?

All four went straight to an adult answer, that I'm sure he had no clue about.  Blah blah blah about taxes ... foreign policy ... jobs. They pandered to him, while giving an election campaign style response.

This was a kid that probably plays baseball (at least until the COVID-19 pandemic) ... rode his bike ... maybe played hockey ... and likely played video games).

Was he at all interested in the answer he received?  Not likely.

What might have been a better response?

Given the Liberal government of Justin Trudeau canceled the Children’s Fitness Tax Credit, perhaps asking if he is still about to enjoy recreational activities and play organized sports. Relating their own childhood experiences, and that they want him and his friends to be able to continue to enjoy that.

Asking if young Max gets an allowance ... and is he learning the importance of saving for that new Play Station or Xbox system, or game?  Relating that to the importance of being able to have a piggy bank for the important things’ government is responsible for.

 

Relating a story perhaps, from their youth, about someone who made a huge positive impression on them -- what that meant to them -- and how it made them want to be like that as an adult – and how that impacted their decision for public service.

At least on candidate (can’t recall which one) said something about creating an environment (or something like that) so that he might have the opportunity to become Prime Minister some day.

Why?  What reason did they give Max to think about doing that? Anyway, enough about that – for now ... maybe another day I’ll come back to it.

As for O’Toole taking shots at MacKay? O’Toole took a few well-placed ones --- not unexpected – however they were for the most part pretty tame.

The expected foreign affairs issue with our trading partners and allies ... free trade ... the UN, and in particular the World Health Organization (WHO) ... Canadian security around the necessities of life, and health protection items ... who was more patriotic around or armed forces (I loved MacKay’s comment about flying in a Sea King helicopter, and an unspoken reference to their safety) ... health ... jobs ... racism and do we have some racism, or do we have systemic racism, in Canadian organizations.

Sloan, as expected, hit more strongly on social issues – and Lewis was softer on that, saying that there is room in the tent for all. MacKay and O’Toole also echoed that, however to me the genuineness didn’t feel as sincere.

It was all the stuff you’d expect to hear from the candidates – and which honestly didn’t really move me much emotionally.

Maybe that’s good, because I thinks that to much decision making around governance is based on who has made us feel good, rather than perhaps what might hurt a bit because that’s what’s needed for our future well-being, that of our children, as well as friends, family, and neighbours.

The order of my ballot choices aren’t firmly locked in yet, so I still have a big decision ahead of me ... and I wonder how many others are in the same position?


I’ll wish you success as you make your own determination.  It’s an important one as ultimately your choice is who may become our next Prime Minister.

What answer(s) have they given you as to why they should be your #1 choice.

Ask them, like Max did ... "Why do you want to be Prime Minister?"

Comments

  1. Thanks Alan, as someone who did not make time to watch the Tory leadership debate I appreciate your take on it, though I won't be voting because I don't think I'm a member, being a probably-now-lapsed PPCer. Right now I'm a sort of none-of-the-above supporter, meaning I may end up voting for the least damaging choice in the next election.
    I really wish the federal Conservatives could re-discover their populist roots but it seems since the advent of Stephen Harper the party has become a top-down oligarchy of wealthy and powerful backroomers who put like-minded blue conservatives into key party positions, which led to decisions like hiring an on-line hitman to try to undermine their rival, PPC leader Maxime Bernier, which they did, but meanwhile look who won!
    Until the CPC turfs the elitists it will have a hard time winning a federal election. The elitists can remain as members and lobby for some policy planks but they should not be allowed to have unilateral dominance.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH: Without a strong local presence, there is NO reason for anyone to tune in to local(?) radio

LOCAL HOMETOWN RADIO IS DYING … and without serious measures put in place, it will likely never see the light of day again. For well over four decades, the Canadian Radio and Television Commission (CRTC) has presided over its’ demise, and for that I say, “Shame”. Without out a word to say enough was enough, the CRTC has allowed corporate Canada to buy up one radio station after the other, and then allowed them to slash staff to the point where some so-called local radio stations do nothing more than air programming that originates from communities well outside the region in which they are located. Case in point?   On CHNL* 610 in Kamloops, the morning show hosted by Vinnie and Randi, DOES NOT originate from Kamloops -- it doesn’t even originate here in BC. It’s a program that Stingray airs across multiple radio stations in Western Canada. It doesn’t end there. Not only are Vinnie and Rando doing mornings on CHNL, but they also show up on sister station Country 103 … and of course o...

Conservative Economic Team Responds to Urgent Industry Concerns

 " For far too long, the BC NDP has ignored the economic challenges facing British Columbians. Manufacturing jobs are vanishing, forestry is in decline, and private sector employment growth has stagnated. Meanwhile, affordability has worsened for both families and businesses. British Columbians deserve better, and we’re here to deliver real solutions to rebuild our economy and create jobs that support everyday working people and their families ." – Gavin Dew, MLA and Shadow Minister for Jobs, Economy, Development, and Innovation.   December 3, 2024, Vancouver, BC – The Conservative economic team met today with business leaders and stakeholders to tackle critical issues impacting British Columbia’s economy. Attended by 9 critics from the Conservative Caucus, this meeting was convened by MLA Gavin Dew – Shadow Minister for Jobs, Economic Development, and Innovation - as a direct response to an October 30th open letter from seven of the province’s largest industry associations. ...

WARD STAMER -- We need certainly in our markets, and certainly in our fibre supply, before we no longer have a forest industry in this province

Image Government of BC I think we all realize that the threat of Trump’s 25% tariff is like other provocative statements he’s made in the past. That said, we should have reason to be concerned. Tariffs don’t benefit anyone. A tariff of that magnitude – included on our own softwood lumber exports, will make things more expensive for Americans, and cause friction in the supply chain. If imposed, a twenty-five percent tariff will be equally detrimental to the citizens and economy of the United States, as well as the people of BC. There are two things, however, of equal concern to the threat of punitive tariffs by incoming U.S. President-elect Donald Trump. One is our antiquated stumpage fees. It is a legacy from decades ago, and one incapable of responding to changing market conditions. We need to revamp our stumpage system to better reflect market conditions, and our economic costs. Instead, a value-added tax system will be instantly responsive to current market conditions and will encou...

Labels

Show more