Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FORSETH -- It was all the stuff you’d expect to hear from the candidates – and which honestly didn’t really move me much emotionally. Maybe that’s good!

Yesterday afternoon I finally had a chance to watch the Conservative Party English debate. No change in Derek Sloan not being a choice for me.

The big change however is that Peter MacKay has dropped to #3 on my ballot, while Leslyn Lewis has moved to #2, and even making me re-thing my #1 choice. I appreciated her frank answers to questions, and while not as polished as O'Toole and MacKay, I appreciated what she had to say.

What was the worst part of the debate?? When the young boy (Max? Matt?) asked the leadership contenders to answer why the wanted to be the next Prime Minister?

All four went straight to an adult answer, that I'm sure he had no clue about.  Blah blah blah about taxes ... foreign policy ... jobs. They pandered to him, while giving an election campaign style response.

This was a kid that probably plays baseball (at least until the COVID-19 pandemic) ... rode his bike ... maybe played hockey ... and likely played video games).

Was he at all interested in the answer he received?  Not likely.

What might have been a better response?

Given the Liberal government of Justin Trudeau canceled the Children’s Fitness Tax Credit, perhaps asking if he is still about to enjoy recreational activities and play organized sports. Relating their own childhood experiences, and that they want him and his friends to be able to continue to enjoy that.

Asking if young Max gets an allowance ... and is he learning the importance of saving for that new Play Station or Xbox system, or game?  Relating that to the importance of being able to have a piggy bank for the important things’ government is responsible for.

 

Relating a story perhaps, from their youth, about someone who made a huge positive impression on them -- what that meant to them -- and how it made them want to be like that as an adult – and how that impacted their decision for public service.

At least on candidate (can’t recall which one) said something about creating an environment (or something like that) so that he might have the opportunity to become Prime Minister some day.

Why?  What reason did they give Max to think about doing that? Anyway, enough about that – for now ... maybe another day I’ll come back to it.

As for O’Toole taking shots at MacKay? O’Toole took a few well-placed ones --- not unexpected – however they were for the most part pretty tame.

The expected foreign affairs issue with our trading partners and allies ... free trade ... the UN, and in particular the World Health Organization (WHO) ... Canadian security around the necessities of life, and health protection items ... who was more patriotic around or armed forces (I loved MacKay’s comment about flying in a Sea King helicopter, and an unspoken reference to their safety) ... health ... jobs ... racism and do we have some racism, or do we have systemic racism, in Canadian organizations.

Sloan, as expected, hit more strongly on social issues – and Lewis was softer on that, saying that there is room in the tent for all. MacKay and O’Toole also echoed that, however to me the genuineness didn’t feel as sincere.

It was all the stuff you’d expect to hear from the candidates – and which honestly didn’t really move me much emotionally.

Maybe that’s good, because I thinks that to much decision making around governance is based on who has made us feel good, rather than perhaps what might hurt a bit because that’s what’s needed for our future well-being, that of our children, as well as friends, family, and neighbours.

The order of my ballot choices aren’t firmly locked in yet, so I still have a big decision ahead of me ... and I wonder how many others are in the same position?


I’ll wish you success as you make your own determination.  It’s an important one as ultimately your choice is who may become our next Prime Minister.

What answer(s) have they given you as to why they should be your #1 choice.

Ask them, like Max did ... "Why do you want to be Prime Minister?"

Comments

  1. Thanks Alan, as someone who did not make time to watch the Tory leadership debate I appreciate your take on it, though I won't be voting because I don't think I'm a member, being a probably-now-lapsed PPCer. Right now I'm a sort of none-of-the-above supporter, meaning I may end up voting for the least damaging choice in the next election.
    I really wish the federal Conservatives could re-discover their populist roots but it seems since the advent of Stephen Harper the party has become a top-down oligarchy of wealthy and powerful backroomers who put like-minded blue conservatives into key party positions, which led to decisions like hiring an on-line hitman to try to undermine their rival, PPC leader Maxime Bernier, which they did, but meanwhile look who won!
    Until the CPC turfs the elitists it will have a hard time winning a federal election. The elitists can remain as members and lobby for some policy planks but they should not be allowed to have unilateral dominance.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more