Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

With both the Fraser Institute, and the Green Parties Sonia Furstenau, talking a 4-day work week, how soon might it happen?

Canadians could enjoy a four-day work week—and actually work fewer hours—without giving up income or sacrificing their living standards if worker productivity increases by two per cent per year for the next decade, finds a new study by the Fraser Institute, an independent, non-partisan Canadian public policy think-tank.

In light of the COVID lockdown, there’s been a lot of talk about a possible four-day work week in Canada, but to achieve a four-day work week where we actually work fewer hours while at the same time maintaining our current living standards, we need to be more productive,” said Steven Globerman, a Fraser Institute senior fellow and author of Reducing the Workweek Through Improved Productivity.

Yesterday, when I asked BC Green Party interim leader Adam Olsen, about the study, he stated that while he’d only just had a chance to read through it for the first time, and that he’d need time to digest and get advice from their policy team, he felt the conclusion (of the study) landed very positively.

According to the Fraser Institute, the study finds that if worker productivity grew by two per cent per year from 2018 to 2030, Canadians could work four days per week—and not just longer works days—with no loss of living standards.

It went on to say that with two per cent productivity growth per year, workers would even enjoy an inflation-adjusted cumulative 1.5 per cent increase in income.

But is a two per cent annual productivity increase possible?

The study shows that from 2010 to 2016, productivity in Canada increased by 1.05 per cent per year, but looking back through recent history, two per cent annual productivity growth rates were common in earlier decades.

If governments pursue policies that encourage entrepreneurship and innovation, worker productivity will rise and Canadians will be able to enjoy more leisure time,” Globerman said.

Looking at the concluding comments (page 11) of the “Reducing the Workweek Through Improved Productivity, it states (in part) that:

... workers obviously want both higher
real incomes and increased leisure. The goal of working a 4-day work week while continuing to enjoy substantial increases in real standards of living is both reasonable and realistic. The key to achieving it is for the economy to produce a faster rate of productivity growth in the years ahead than has been realized in recent years ... 

And that seems to be a fit, with a caveat, for Olsen who stated:

I prefer this characterization of “reasonable” and “realistic” -- provided we look at policy that addresses labour productivity issues -- that have been flagging in recent years in Canada/BC/North America”.

Green Party leadership
candidate Sonia Furstenau

And for Green Party leadership candidate Sonia Furstenau?  The move to a four-day work week needs to happen sooner, rather than the suggested ten-year time frame put forward by the Fraser Institute.

I disagree”, she stated. “
Companies and organizations, that have already shifted, have found that productivity and employee happiness go up ... sick days go down ... workers spend time more wisely ... stress levels lower”.

She continued, “
There is nothing sacrosanct about a 5-day work week. It was widely established in the early 1900s in the context of factory work. The nature of work and technology has changed. We are now well into the 21st century; it is long past time to modernize our work practices”.

To move this idea forward in BC, development of the 4-day work week concept must be done in consultation with labour, businesses and other experts. It's the kind of innovative idea that should be explored in our COVID-19 recovery”, Furstenau concluded.


With Furstenau raising the idea a few weeks back – and now this latest report from the Fraser Institute, is it possible BC workers might in fact be headed to a four-day work week ... and sooner than later?


All I can say is I’m surprised to see the Fraser Institute, and the Green Party, on a line which might just merge – which means sooner than later is a distinct possibility.



Are you an employee ... are you an employer ... what do you think about the idea?  Post your comments below.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more