Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

With both the Fraser Institute, and the Green Parties Sonia Furstenau, talking a 4-day work week, how soon might it happen?

Canadians could enjoy a four-day work week—and actually work fewer hours—without giving up income or sacrificing their living standards if worker productivity increases by two per cent per year for the next decade, finds a new study by the Fraser Institute, an independent, non-partisan Canadian public policy think-tank.

In light of the COVID lockdown, there’s been a lot of talk about a possible four-day work week in Canada, but to achieve a four-day work week where we actually work fewer hours while at the same time maintaining our current living standards, we need to be more productive,” said Steven Globerman, a Fraser Institute senior fellow and author of Reducing the Workweek Through Improved Productivity.

Yesterday, when I asked BC Green Party interim leader Adam Olsen, about the study, he stated that while he’d only just had a chance to read through it for the first time, and that he’d need time to digest and get advice from their policy team, he felt the conclusion (of the study) landed very positively.

According to the Fraser Institute, the study finds that if worker productivity grew by two per cent per year from 2018 to 2030, Canadians could work four days per week—and not just longer works days—with no loss of living standards.

It went on to say that with two per cent productivity growth per year, workers would even enjoy an inflation-adjusted cumulative 1.5 per cent increase in income.

But is a two per cent annual productivity increase possible?

The study shows that from 2010 to 2016, productivity in Canada increased by 1.05 per cent per year, but looking back through recent history, two per cent annual productivity growth rates were common in earlier decades.

If governments pursue policies that encourage entrepreneurship and innovation, worker productivity will rise and Canadians will be able to enjoy more leisure time,” Globerman said.

Looking at the concluding comments (page 11) of the “Reducing the Workweek Through Improved Productivity, it states (in part) that:

... workers obviously want both higher
real incomes and increased leisure. The goal of working a 4-day work week while continuing to enjoy substantial increases in real standards of living is both reasonable and realistic. The key to achieving it is for the economy to produce a faster rate of productivity growth in the years ahead than has been realized in recent years ... 

And that seems to be a fit, with a caveat, for Olsen who stated:

I prefer this characterization of “reasonable” and “realistic” -- provided we look at policy that addresses labour productivity issues -- that have been flagging in recent years in Canada/BC/North America”.

Green Party leadership
candidate Sonia Furstenau

And for Green Party leadership candidate Sonia Furstenau?  The move to a four-day work week needs to happen sooner, rather than the suggested ten-year time frame put forward by the Fraser Institute.

I disagree”, she stated. “
Companies and organizations, that have already shifted, have found that productivity and employee happiness go up ... sick days go down ... workers spend time more wisely ... stress levels lower”.

She continued, “
There is nothing sacrosanct about a 5-day work week. It was widely established in the early 1900s in the context of factory work. The nature of work and technology has changed. We are now well into the 21st century; it is long past time to modernize our work practices”.

To move this idea forward in BC, development of the 4-day work week concept must be done in consultation with labour, businesses and other experts. It's the kind of innovative idea that should be explored in our COVID-19 recovery”, Furstenau concluded.


With Furstenau raising the idea a few weeks back – and now this latest report from the Fraser Institute, is it possible BC workers might in fact be headed to a four-day work week ... and sooner than later?


All I can say is I’m surprised to see the Fraser Institute, and the Green Party, on a line which might just merge – which means sooner than later is a distinct possibility.



Are you an employee ... are you an employer ... what do you think about the idea?  Post your comments below.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more