Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED -- We either have a politically neutral, independent justice system or we have a dictatorship

Is Canada a banana republic, or
a free and open democracy?
The Canadian government can intervene to end Meng's extradition trial. Should it? Extradition Act allows justice minister to intervene at any point during judicial phase

Mark Gollom, Olivia Stefanovich ~~ CBC News ~~ Jun 23, 2020

While seasoned jurists say the Canadian government has every legal right to intervene to free Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou from her extradition trial to the U.S., some experts warn such an action could have significant political ramifications.

“The question isn't whether the [Canadian government] can, the question is whether they should," said Toronto-based lawyer Brian Greenspan.

In 1999, the Extradition Act was amended to include a specific provision that provides the federal minister of justice the power to intervene in an extradition at any point during the judicial phase.  

"The minister has the right to withdraw the authority to proceed and to end the extradition proceeding, and it's totally at the discretion of the minister of justice," Greenspan said.

* * * * * * * * * * * * *


This is proof of how dangerous our federal government has become. Our justice system is styled to be fair, impartial and politically neutral. The Justice Minister is a political appointment -- and not politically neutral. The justice system is under the control of the Attorney General which is, of necessity, a politically neutral position.

Our governments have chosen to make the Attorney General and Justice Minister one position, an obvious conflict of interest.

We watched in horror as the Clerk of the Privy Council, who is also required to hold a politically neutral position reporting to the Governor General, attempt to pressure the Attorney General, another politically neutral position, into not prosecuting SNC-Lavalin for purely political reasons.

That is what we would expect in a banana republic or dictatorship like China, but not in a free and open democracy.

Our justice system must stand alone, separate and apart from the government in all aspects. We can refer laws that infringe on our rights and freedoms to the justice system for review to ensure that our government does not infringe on our constitutional rights through statute. That is how laws, or sections of laws are ‘struck down’ or declared void by a judge.

We must never give up the right to protection from a government that seeks to crush us by overriding our fundamental rights.

The current overabundance of conflicting coronavirus regulations, issued under health care emergency provisions, is an example of the mess we get into when we mix politics and justice.

Provinces have no power over quarantine. That is a federal constitutional jurisdiction and responsibility. It does not matter what provincial health care legislation has been adopted; provincial legislation cannot override the constitution or expand provincial powers.

Similarly the federal government cannot use legislation to provide itself with powers to intervene in the application of justice.

We either have a politically neutral, independent justice system or we have a dictatorship. There are no alternatives. Political interference in our justice system is not acceptable.

Businesses and individuals have a right to fair, independent and impartial treatment by our justice system and courts.

Politicians putting their fingers on the scales of justice is not allowed.


John Feldsted ... is a political commentator, consultant, and strategist. He makes his home in Winnipeg, Manitoba.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more